I don't think we should allow exchanges to stake. With that much steem, enough exchanges staking could still control the chain.
RE: Steem - Perhaps STEEM could benefit from catching up with the times...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Steem - Perhaps STEEM could benefit from catching up with the times...
With them only having 3 votes, it would greatly reduce the likelihood of a single entity controlling the chain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
But not colluding exchanges.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not if they have declined voting rights.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Or if they only have 3 votes like was mentioned in the post...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I honestly think exchanges should not be voting at all. It's just safer that way.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well there is that. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit