I end up with about 10-16 votes a day and make them count as best I can - all the rest is commenting with no voting. I feel like people appreciate that and will continue this way for the time being. Once my vote is over $1 at 100% - I might think again.
I know people who vote many, many times a day - stay at 505 power maybe - and neither side gets a reward. I think the voter is wasting time and the author just shrugs when seeing the vote. No interaction at all.
Thanks for the boost. Loved your comment @por500bolos
"and neither side gets a reward."
The reward is mathematically proportional to your VP. Continuing to claim this is false and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the mathematical reality involved.
It is also 100% contradictory to the whole basis of your argument above of "monetary relativity":
"so you have a different concept of relevant money than I do."
Your argument is internally inconsistent.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If someone votes 30 times in a day and gets only 5 rewards for that day - what happened to the other 25 votes? This is what I see repeatedly with little minnows.
I'm in the third world - a small amount of money means more here than it would in the first world. This is the relevance factor I am describing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are very welcome my dear @fitinfun.
Yes! I guess that unless your full 100% vote gives at least $100.00 you won't need to think anything again. You are just using you VP as humanly & cleverly as it should be.
Smart comments, wise engagement and conscious interaction is the king here!! :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
" full 100% vote gives at least $100.00 you won't need to think anything again"
Explain how your completely arbitrary line of $100 above, provided with no evidence, is not completely inconsistent with the argument you are trying to agree with of "monetary relativity":
"Well, you do not live in the 3rd world, so you have a different concept of relevant money than I do. I was raised by a scottish lady and learned to pinch the pennies to make the dollars count."
Your entire position is internally inconsistent, and leads either to no relevant conclusion, or the conclusion of trying to control other's activity. I care for neither.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit