RE: How should Steemit Inc decentralize their stake?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

How should Steemit Inc decentralize their stake?

in steem •  7 years ago 

So, you have to be continuously glued to the screen to curate and reap a curation reward. Or use bot farms.

No, at any given moment, there will be some new good posts that have just been published. You don't have to curate all to curate some.

A bigger issue in my mind is the fact that curation rewards, intended to reward manual and intelligent curation showing "proof of brain", can be reliably beaten by just automatically front-running vote selling bots.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  7 years ago (edited)

No, at any given moment, there will be some new good posts that have just been published. You don't have to curate all to curate some.

Agreed partly, because for some timezones that are not very active, the good posts are usually only visible the next day.

A bigger issue in my mind is the fact that curation rewards, intended to reward manual and intelligent curation showing "proof of brain", can be reliably beaten by just automatically front-running vote selling bots.

Totally agreed. This and a lot of other problems are the typical "tragedy of the commons". They could be solved by removing the concept of a common reward pool and tying votes to actual transfer of currency.