This is a complicated matter. Yes, we can use more decentralization, but at times we also need coordinated efforts. That's where Steem Alliance should have their place, but I don't really know what is their situation now.
RE: HF21 talk
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
HF21 talk
Well... I feel like a buzzkiller, but they dont seem to care much about nothing more than money...
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Money always have a strange effect on people.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, but that short minded view can destroy the entire ecosystem.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, "money" were always part of Steem, and people think of it, so unless we plan on removing the rewards, we have to deal with the amplified reactions based on effects to people's wallets.
That's a "problem" regular social media sites (still) don't have.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Totally agree.
On the other hands, we need to start participating on the decission making somehow, i mean, we have an entire voting system, its curious how we are not able to choose.
I was thinking on authenticate users. Have a parlament and get closest to a democracy, for monarchys we have facebook and twitter
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
In theory, our governance is assured by witnesses, which we can vote in or out of their positions.
In practice, it's pretty hard for community voted witnesses to accede to Top 20. Not impossible though. But still there are 20 places in Top 20, and a super majority means 17.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I know of course. But individual votes doesnt count. Votes count by stakes.
And that is how the system can be easily manipulated by a tiny elite (correct me if im wrong)
And sorry about my bad english
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are not wrong. That problem has been discussed before, because many felt or knew some witnesses were artificially kept in Top 20, because they followed a certain line.
It's a delicate matter. And it cannot be changed immediately, but in time, with a stronger middle class grown. Of course the EIP changes don't facilitate the growth of a strong middle class, and that's not a good thing either about it.
Other blockchains (bitcoin, EOS and probably Etherium) have an even smaller number of true decision-makers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit