RE: Can we have downvotes and at the same time prevent 'flag wars'?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Can we have downvotes and at the same time prevent 'flag wars'?

in steem •  5 years ago  (edited)

... what options will I as a user have to defend myself against a decision by this committee?

Don't plagiarise, don't spam with ten minimal posts per day, don't put child pornography online ... :)
If you read my article you know that I am against to flag dog posts just because I like cats. :)

Is the committee almighty as the King of England used to be or will there be a legal process?

I suggest the committee to be elected and reconfirmed regularly by the community. It would have quite an amount of STEEM power, but of course if many users upvoted a post they still could outvote the committee.

Anyway, I don't think it to be useful to discuss too many details as long as nobody is in favour of my idea ...

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

"Don't plagiarise, don't spam with ten minimal posts per day, don't put child pornography online ... :)"

Not completely agree.

To post something in the own blog is for me not spaming cause everybody is free to read my blog or let it be. Spaming is for me to put spam-contest in blog of other users.

Second I think that not only child pornography should not be put at steemit - I think that also "normal" pornography should have no place at this plattform.

To post something in the own blog is for me not spaming cause ...

You love to complicate things, right? Now you start a discussion about what spam is, even if I actually didn't define it. :)

I think that also "normal" pornography should have no place at this plattform.

Why not? If it disturbs you, in your profile you can activate the setting not to show NSFW content (but I notice pornographic content very rarely here, so it's not in the focus of the discussion anyway).

" You love to complicate things, right? Now you start a discussion about what spam is, even if I actually didn't define it. :)"

So the comitee should decide about something what isn't defined ?

So the comitee should decide about something what isn't defined ?

Anyway, I don't think it to be useful to discuss too many details as long as nobody is in favour of my idea ...

In case enough people would like the idea of implementing committees there still would be plenty of time to discusss many minor things.

OK let's hope that your idea will gain more interest.
Thank you for this long discussion - they was very interesting for me.