Most of us would agree that the current approach to allocating rewards is a bit shit, where the bid bots and whale whisperers take home almost all of the reward pool, while most actual content creators fight for scraps.
So, what would you suggest is a better way to calculate rewards? You can be vague, or suggest precise formulae.
Snax is going to start rewarding Steem users from 19th May. Their team has been very receptive to feedback thus far, and made several changes as per popular requests. If there are good ideas here, I'm sure they'll tweak their reward algorithm accordingly. But moreover, it's a thought experiment that'll also let Steem developers know what users really want.
Assume that you have access to the Steem blockchain, and you can use any data within it to calculate rewards. It can be something simple like some combination of # of comments on the post, follower count, # of votes, pending rewards; or something radical.
My idea is to look at relationships between accounts, and reward those that generate engagement (comments) from a diverse set of users. Each user gets an engagement score. A user that's known to be engaging with a diverse set of other users will be able to influence the rewards more for whichever post they leave their comments on. If they start abusing the system by collusion or Sybil attacks, their engagement score will drop automatically. I don't have any details about how this can be implemented, but hey, I did say we can be vague!
Thanks for this important discussion. I believe there is no mechanism that cannot be abused. But, we can do much better than we are doing now.
I would in part keep the current formula, but include a soft cap of max rewards. If your post hits let's say 100 SBD just as an example, adding another whale vote worth 30 SBD should be worth significantly less. Also, although voting strength should still be based on SP, it should also include different parameters like user interaction, the diversity of voting (a certain % of votes for always the same accounts or yourself should trigger a reduction), reputation score (which should be calculated differently to correlate better with the actual reputation within a community), and expertise in a field (e.g. if you earned a lot of SP withing the "art" tag, your vote on posts using that tag should get a bonus).
Anyhow, this is all super-heavy to implement and would need some serious balancing work.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like this idea - a flattening of the reward pool. This is similar to a publication I used to work for as a video game journalist. Everyone got paid the same for their reviews, whether it was a romping, open world, 80+ hour RPG, or a whimsical puzzle game.
If something was longer form, or was to bring in huge amounts of traffic, or warranted a follow up article or response to an editorial, that meant more money (by virtue of more ads being served) - but could sometimes be a short extension of the original.
We can always reward comments more handsomely than posts in some instances, especially when the author goes out of their way to add real depth in their comments section.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks @mayb for the tag! To be honest there will never be a truly ideal system that everyone feels is fair! Whales and bid botters will do what they will with their stake be it emotional or ROI motivation based! Getting that out of the way I would like to see a 2 fouls reward approach that could help distribute income better and encourage things we want like engagement
Then like steem UA based on your comments, engagement and upvotes form human accounts you get rewards based on that
System Still has room for abuse but what I really just want to encourage is regular contribution and engagement!
Posted using Partiko iOS
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There's one fault with Steem-Ua - I don't think it filters out its own posts when ranking your engagement, or those from well known curation communities such as curie, c-cubed, or ocd.
It's a good problem to have when you get a jumble of those interspersed in your own comment section! I used to use busy for a little while, but haven't touched it in ages, in favor of steempeak.
That voting technique that you have described that they use sounds like an enticing model for genuine content creators.
It's a competitive place for front-ends right now!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I definitely agree with your statements. Reputation depends so much on your personal level of trust with an individual on the chain. For instance, some people in the Steem Monster community have previously asked for me to act as escrow, as they held the view that I could be trusted to not take the money and run.
However, if that same trust needed to transfer into the steem silver gold community, I probably wouldn't have that same level of engagement and "trust-worthiness" to them,
I'm a big fan of the 1 person = 1 vote, and for you to be able to "review" people's profiles based on your feeling for their reputation. Reputation is a funny thing in that regard, however; and could be gamed. If people pay for votes, there's surely someone out there that will pay for reputation.
That's what a lot of political activists end up doing. There's no perfect system. I like to use my gut. The reputation number is nothing than a number.
Actions speak louder than numbers. :)
Thanks for your well considered response!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Can you elaborate or link something about this '2 fouls reward'? I don't know what that means.
UA is nice but I never really understand the way it works and those standard comments could provide a bit more help on how to follow their suggestions, like: "The followers like your work Try reaching more follower!"
Yeah, but how so, ua? :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'd love to see a page-impressions model. Which pages, which posts (regardless of age) generate the most traffic to the platform? There would be a good market for Steemit Inc to then use their stake to provide votes to that content that captures an external audience, especially now that they've got ads on their front end.
Engagement, however, is a huge thing - but there has to be a way to determine real engagement versus the typical "nice post, deer" that we all remember from the early days. With the change to RCs, that isn't as common, but there's a lot of really hollow comments that don't provoke discussion on a lot of posts.
The sad thing is that they aren't comments like "This post made me so speechless, all I can give you is a vote." They're the sorts of engagement that don't provide any evidence that the post has even been read.
An interesting way, like you said, would be the relationships between accounts. I had an incredible interaction with @mayb on a recent post of mine, and ever since then, by following them, I've uncovered a few other Steemians who engage in a deep, meaningful, and intellectual manner.
I guess that's the sort of people that I'm chasing, and the sort of content that I enjoy.
The fact that this place is somewhere genuine engagement and intellectual satisfaction can sometimes be found makes it feel like a much more mature environment, and I try to reward that wherever I see that happening.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I was so happy to read your comment that I upvoted before even checking the context! :D So, mayb read it first …
Now I've read it all and I love the idea. One of my latest posts was about the commenting behavior which is definitely improvable. I agree with both of you, @holoz0r, @liberosist. I want to find those people who truly engage and amaze me with their different opinions. A lot of the steem experience, for me personally, is the part of leaving my comfort zone, learning new things and I like all those challenges. We all can profit from communicating more. Monetary and in our personal growth.
Below my above-mentioned post @frankbacon left this hilarious comment:
… still looking for that one interface that has it all! Show me interaction, show me where the party is right now, notify about what my steem friends are discussing when I come online.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Perhaps a trending page that detects genuine discource in the comments section of a post might do.
Do you use Steempeak? It's an excellent front-end. You can save drafts, schedule posts, and save your favourite topics. For responses, I use a combination of Ginabot via discord, partiko (when I'm not at the computer) and most importantly, the stuff that lives between my ears - the original plan for Steem.
Proof of brain. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am using … look for yourself …
And I love it. Btw, @chekohler was going to write a post this week to make some suggestions for steempeak. So, he should also be part of our communication, I feel.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
But yet you're not using the night mode! :) @jarvie and @asgarth are really approachable as some of the driving forces behind steempeak. They're done a phenomenal job that has gone very unrewarded to date.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am also a Steempeak user, and use the beneficiary mechanism to pass 5% of my author rewards for each post I make to Steempeak. It's easy, and hope lot's of folks do the same.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
SEE?!? That was what I forget to mention in my last comment! I was going to say "but there's still a lot I haven't fully explored in the dapp. It's simply not that neat&clean as assbook or twatter. Nightmode??? FTW! CHECK!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Unfortunately, I've recently reactivated by assbook, asstagram, and I never left twatter. It's all part of a ploy to try and get some more people across to this platform where they may actually be rewarded in a minuscule way for their content, words, and opinions.
It'll be a slow burn, and I've tried before. I'll try some more. It's much easier to turn a creative, thinking, breathing thing into a crypto person than it is to turn a normie into a crypto person.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
most definitely. It takes the will to learn and the creativity to overcome frustrations that might appear in a phase like that where everyone is still figuring out how we want to 'manage' this whole community. I believe in us. First, improve the blockchain, then the world! 🚀
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm yet to see a comment earn more than the post it is linked to for providing additional context or opinion; that isn't charged by a self-vote army, or some unscrupulous vote trading. That would be neat to see. Perhaps the "value" of all comments on a post relative to the actual post itself would be an interesting metric to show true engagement.
i.e post is $1.00, value of votes for comments is 0.20c, votes are from other parties that are not the post author or comment-leaver. That could have an engagement score of 20%, or something. Just thinking out aloud. :)
Regarding the "parrot": It's a chicken! The pet of my soon to be mother in law. It is named "Special". It once tried to wander into a pre-heating oven on its own accord. She's a silly chicken.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have seen comments that organically were upvoted higher than the OP, but it's not common at all.
Chickens are the most vicious predators I have ever met the gaze of. I am damn glad to be larger than them. Prolly make good pets.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Irony is a great mistress. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't have any details about how this can be implemented, but hey, I did say we can be vague!
That's the whole problem, pretty much any algorithmic system that humans can / have devised can be abused on some level through bidbot-esque behavior. Some would argue that algorithmic curation with token rewards is a broken model in itself, and an even more radical alternative (not based on votes and steem power) would be the only way -- but at that point, it would be a different blockchain entirely.
At this point I feel like the Steem experiment is already in orbit, and we're just going to see how this concept plays out.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, we're still in beta, and changes will come. Major changes are constantly incoming, and I don't see any real limits on the potential of changes to radically alter the platform, in both beneficial and detrimental ways.
We're in orbit, but development is ongoing and is having enormous impact on the evolution of the platform and community.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Seems engagement is largely a function of VP and willingness to upvote comments, as many opportunistic commenters seem to flock to these accounts. Any type of algoritmic rewarding/voting is bound to fail unless true manual curration is factored in as the primary variable. A secondary variable that I think is usefull is the non-usage of bidbots. Aggressive bid bot users are usually easy to identify. They have high reputations that truly don't match their VP status. I would suggest some sort of reward correction based on the VP to raw-reputation ratio.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You're spot on that there's no substitute for manual curation. That said, our goal here is to do the best we can with an algorithm, and I'm sure we can do a lot better than what currently exists.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Excellent post and ideas. I also think that page view metrics should be used. The simple fact is, people should read and reward if they enjoy or if it's considered thought and effort has gone into the post. Engagement creates more users and is the only thing that will drive growth and set us apart from all the other 'content providers' on the net.
System will never change though because there are too many greedy people with too much influence and too much to lose if they can't shit post their way to as much cash as they can.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Unfortunately, there's no way to determine page views metric on the blockchain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Honestly, if reward allocation was based on metrics like views/blog (only counting with recorded interaction like page scrolling and time spent), length of post (word count), pictures, structure comments (and length of comments), and an author reputation system that was actually based on real engagement like time spent on others blogs as well as how many posts they put out, then we'd at least have a steem that would more often reward based on quality.
I absolutely agree that this is the case with steem currently. I've had to reduce my time spent in community activities simply to be able to focus on keeping a blog presence on steem while earning from freelance writing elsewhere. Posts and comments are all I can afford to do here and that's directly proportional to the reward system. I'm still hopeful, although less so than I was, that steem might take off again with another bull run. So I keep doing what I can on here, while earning what I need to live elsewhere.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit