However, one single user receiving such a large percentage of the reward pool IS DEFINITELY WRONG concerning Steem and its future. I don't think I need to mention what would happen if they decided to cash out one day. I don't think I need to mention how much uncertainty and doubt this news could spread. I don't think it's good for the platform's future to provide a single user with this possibility. There have to be some limits.
I strongly believe that this issue has to be resolved promptly. One of the primary reasons is the noise this news has already been making.
Everything mentioned above is my humble point of view. The blockchain is about liberty and there can be no liberty without freedom of speech.
DISCLAIMER: I have great respect and admiration for the specific user and his knowledge, skills and will to help by sharing his secrets with others. This post is not accusing @haejin for anything at all. This post was made taking into consideration the best interests of our favourite platform and only.
@originalworks
@steem-untalented
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @lordneroo to be original material and upvoted it!
To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit