So what this implies is that he took the picture but yet did not look in that Direction again after taking the picture. did it move? did it walk away? Did it Fly Away ? did it merely disappear? is it a tree trunk? a lot of easily answered questions. all he would have had to do is walk over to where it was and prove one way or another what it was. If he was walking towards it and it took off running and he took more than one picture I would be a believer but because simple things are not done I do not ever believe in things like this. I do believe they are merely done for attention. I hope he got all the attention he wanted. And I feel for the people that believe in things like this without questioning it themselves where has Common Sense gone. You are telling me that you come across something like this and only take one picture or you do not move forward to explore. you do not have any more details except one picture.
RE: Appearance in Scotland, Original Loch Ness Monster?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Appearance in Scotland, Original Loch Ness Monster?
Thanks for your information @mchalem. First time please your resteem and upvote my article post.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit