That exclusion list was never to be interpreted as a 'final decision' and those on the list can appeal. Many would have been approved. It just doesn't make sense to fork a chain and include the hostile takeover elements from the previous chain, because that would make the new chain pointless, since the new chain only exists to get away from the hostile takeover. It's common sense. Those excluded just needed to be patient and professional while things get sorted out.
RE: Relax ~ Nothing is under control
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Relax ~ Nothing is under control
But if we use that argument does it not also justify this recent fork and fucking with people accounts?
There has been a great outpouring of hostility on the steem blockchain by the initiators of Hive.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
no not really because the accounts frozen had already (for weeks) disabled their witnesses. There was no threat to Steem here, this softfork is clearly just petty retribution by idiots who cannot see the consequences that will come for their actions.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Are they not allowed to use Bitcoin because they have accounts on Hive?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The point you were making was justifying forking out hostile accounts and depriving them of funds.
I dont think that can be justified ether here or anywhere. My point was that if you justify it in one place for whatever reason you justify it everywhere, even here and I dont want that to be justifiable.
And I am sure you dont want that ether
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Those accounts were not forked out. Stick to the facts please and apply logic. Anyone who did not receive the airdrop still has full control of their account on Hive and they're free to use it as they see fit. If they were excluded from the airdrop, they can appeal. Only the accounts actively participating in strengthening a Sybil attack on Steem were excluded. You cannot include that attack on a new chain if your intent is to create a new chain to get away from said Sybil attack. Pretty basic common sense here and with the appeal process, it was handled professionally. It wasn't just a handful of accounts selected out of spite.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Stop making so much sense.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Okay so there's an elephant smoking a cigarette and I feel like dancing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
INR lol
He's making total sense.... Almost a scary amount of sense =)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the reply, it is greatly appreciated.
You said that really well btw
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good points!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No. The difference is that the people now milking Steem do not threaten the security of the chain. Those people that voted for Sun actively supported centralization and non-functionality of the chain and the other things that Sun promised, like moving Steem dApps to Tron or moving the coin itself to Tron.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If that is all they were doing nobody would care.
I have spent a lot of time looking at the actions of the accounts concerned and others not mentioned.
I would guess the main objection would be the voting of witnesses then removing the votes a few days later, taking people in and out of the top twenty at will. It is amusing but it also creates instability. I am not sure if their efforts were coordinated but it is possible I guess.
I notice that not all accounts behaving in that manner were targeted. Lucky them.
And I think some who were NOT doing that were targeted. Not good
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm not sure if we are talking about the same people. With the people milking Steem I mean people who just post to earn as many rewards as possible and then sell them. I am myself doing this in the MILK communtiy.
This is what Sun is doing. Only he has the power to remove or add top witnesses at will.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great, I don't see why he hasn't appealed... guess a bad taste in mouth from being on it int he first place.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Those feelings are common I see, but unnecessary. Nobody was singled out. The code simply looked at where votes where placed, then excluded those accounts based on the simple fact those accounts at the time were contributing to strengthening a Sybil attack. It had nothing to do with politics or beliefs or any of that nonsense.
I was initially excluded from the Palnet airdrop. My account didn't qualify due to the criteria placed in the code(I was inactive for a time, but had returned), but that code didn't mean someone could look and see that I was in fact active, so I remained calm and waited patiently. Eventually got added. I saw others freaking out, taking it personally, insulting people, writing slanderous posts. Of course some of those folks were not added to the list. That's how the world works I guess.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit