First we see futures markets opening, now we have the first ever ratings agency releasing a special report dedicated to cryptocurrencies. This is what happens when a market sector is worth hundreds of billions of dollars.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://i.imgur.com/dhxZJxV.jpg)
The new Weiss Cryptocurrency Ratings website launched on Wednesday 24 January 2018 with its first ever report.
The first response was a cyberattack from Korea. The buzz on social media was that some coins were given a poor rating and could tank.
Steem was given a rating of B-; this is the same as NEO and Cardano. Only EOS and Ethereum scored higher with a B. Every other coin was below this, with the flagship Bitcoin limping in at C+. The (unverified) data appears to be available on twitter.
This now explains the 60% spike yesterday, seeing STEEM go from about $4.30 to $6.80; as of writing it remains at $6.60.
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://i.imgur.com/dUA2XRt.jpg)
With so much money now involved, cryptocurrencies will continue to come under the same kinds of scrutiny as other financials.
But this has been great news for STEEM!
What do you think about having rating agencies for cryptos?
With some 1500 coins, will it shine some much-needed light on the market, or will it introduce unwelcomed external bias?
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://i.imgur.com/9Mvn9fs.jpg)
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://i.imgur.com/MtKq9KV.jpg)
Please Comment, Resteem and Upvote. Thanks!
@rycharde manages the AAKOM project and the MAP forum.
Seems a bit unfair to give etherium a B when it has such issues with network performance much like Bitcoin, and Eos a B when it doesn't actually work yet meanwhile steem which is a battle tested and proven technology a B-... But then I am biased
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The Weiss FAQ explains that the overall grade is composed of 4 sub-grades, so a coin could be, for example, AACC and end up with a B. For an individual, it then depends whether the As are more important than the Cs.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
wham bam ty weiss !
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Fascinating! I have been a reader of Martin Weiss for over a decade, but was annoyed pretty hardcore when I saw that they were going to rate cryptos. These are doom and gloomer publishers. I couldn't imagine how they could possibly view any crypto other than centralized crap coins like ripple or stellar as having any fundamentals. I'm glad to see they did their homework and found projects with real potential. Yay Steemit!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You thought Weiss would barge in as a party-pooper?!
I'm slightly annoyed as their top 5 coins are precisely those I was looking at over the next month. damn! I'm in the wrong job!
The full report is paywalled at almost $500 pa, but no doubt will slither out. I appreciate the doom and gloomers, so long as it doesn't turn into a marketing posture; one has to pay for real research!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the post. I have been following this and am curious to see how this will play out in the future.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think it is a good development that this has come from an agency such as Weiss that prides itself in being independent and taking no money from the companies it rates. We all know what happens when ratings agencies are in bed with the companies they rate. The same as when government agencies are staffed by corporate insiders.
Again we see the finance industry trying to bring some order to the wild west!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
8.22% @pushup from @rycharde
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
thanks for sharing. By read this post I have know something new.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by rycharde from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great post Neo to the moon!!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Long overdue. That is an awesome resource. Glad to see someone is taking point on this. I am heading to check it out now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 14.7 % upvote from @boomerang thanks to: @rycharde
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You got a 4.42% upvote from @postpromoter courtesy of @rycharde! Want to promote your posts too? Check out the Steem Bot Tracker website for more info. If you would like to support development of @postpromoter and the bot tracker please vote for @yabapmatt for witness!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit