I agree that a lower STEEM price is healthy to improve distribution and author rewards should be linear and not dependent on total payout. The official post doesn't explain very well, but basically any content below a few dollars is punished and everything above that threshold is increasingly rewarded.This encourages users to vote only the highest paying content for the rewards. Anything below a few pennies is known as "dust" and completely negated. Thus, the vast majority of financial rewards are claimed by large wallets and robot voters.
RE: [Discussion Post] Where do we take STEEM from here? A post for STEEM community discussion
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
[Discussion Post] Where do we take STEEM from here? A post for STEEM community discussion
Yes, you understand correct. The old steemians (Big stake holder SP) don't wants to earn other steemians. They make the system to their earning only, not for all steemians points. So, now they moved from here and let distribute the reward pool to every steemias in equal parts proportionate to their SP. We have to encourage every steemians not discourage them. Each steemians has their value in this platform to bring it to moon. Thanks for understanding the point.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit