No midlife crisis so far. No convertible, no mistress and, I don't need a wig as I am not going bald. Of course, I pretty much need money for those things which excludes them from my list of needs.
With the price of Steem increasing, I have noticed a bit more activity from some people and if it continues, many will return.
People often "worry" about the numbers that leave Steem stating one reason or another but as I see it, most will be back. It has actually been a common place move for years by the dissatisfied but, when push comes to shove, most either stay or return once there are benefits to do so.
What is going to be interesting to see is how those who left cope with returning to a platform where they may have lost some of their relevancy or perhaps worse for them, they are no longer earning what they once did.
On a platform such as Steem where earnings are public knowledge and largely transparent, seeing people earn more can be quite an issue of contention. It is something that most in the real world haven't faced before and for me at least, having an open wallet was strange. In fact, talking about personal wealth (or lack their of) of any kind was incredibly uncomfortable.
I remember many times where I made excuses as to why I couldn't join friends for a coffee or drink instead of telling the truth, I just could afford it. It is strange how much stigma there is around financial hardship and how protected most keep information.
I am not talking about tasteless bragging but over the last two years on Steem I have been trying to overcome my discomfort of talking about financial matters. I am still very uncomfortable with it but I force myself to do it for various reasons now.
Firstly, sharing has helped me better understand my own personal economy as I have been forced to address it in numerous ways. On top of that, I have received feedback based upon it with people's own experiences across the financial landscape. While I don't take advice blindly, I do like to consider a wide range of alternatives.
The next major point is that Steem is an economy and one that is quite unusual in the world for several factors. For those coming into the platform, it is either, too good to be true or, expectations run wild and overestimate the potential results and especially, the timeframe to get them.
I am hoping that through my own experiences I can rein in both sides and bring some type of balance by showing it is possible but, it is going to take a lot of work over an extended period of time.
What is great about Steem is that we are really free to make it what we choose however, the pathways we choose are going to suffer the judgement of the crowds to a great degree also. What I mean by this of course is there is a free market system to a great extent and how we each approach the platform is going to influence our potential future upon it. Do what you want is tempered by the consequences of doing what you want.
When it comes to the value one holds on Steem however, there is a fair bit of entitlement felt by those who don't hold Steem. Many feel that they are deserving of what others have, that they should be upvoted, should be supported. Now, don't get me wrong here because if everyone just upvotes themselves, it isn't going to work so a balance has to be found however, no one is entitled to anything on Steem at all a d thankfully, there is no government that is forcing wealth reallocation - it is opt-in.
As said, Steem is an asset class with a great deal of versatility in the way it can be used but, expectation by those who don't have it on how those that do have it should be thought through by both groups. If those without leave unless they get supported "enough" they probably and worthy of the support, if those with are unwilling to support anyone else but themselves, the value of their holdings will diminish even as they grow larger.
Someone recently asked about curation and whether it will earn them more than voting on their own comments 10 times a day. No, it won't. But, voting on your own comments ten times a day isn't likely to build social capital and goodwill in the community which means, always being limited to ones own stake to earn or forced to buy votes.
At some point, buying votes is not going to be profitable for anyone and will instead become processes of marketing and promotion.
What is valuable is that social capital, the value created through relationships and importantly, the interactions between. Those interactions are the transactions and use cases that will power Steem, not the votes themselves.
I do think that in time, most people won't come here to earn at all or at least, it will be a secondary and untargeted bonus to earn on Steem. Most people don't watch and use YouTube to monetize it, most Instagram users aren't looking to brand themselves as a paid product. Most users of Steem are going to be consumers.
What they will benefit from though besides the earning potential which will still be a draw card, is they can directly influence their chosen applications, they can use one account in multiple ways, they can transfer funds globally fast and for free, they will be uncensored and empowered to create and build on an open source platform run and owned by the platform users themselves.
People are finally waking up to the dangers of centralised platforms and the control and power they not only hold, but wield. They are getting tired of a handful of people possessing everything. Once they come into Steem and can see that there is wide distribution and all types of people supported, they will be more willing to take part in the economy.
While there will be differences in outcomes, the people involved are not multinational conglomerates engineered for mass appeal, it will be ground-up real people who are doing the best they can to manage through. Some will be successfully some won't but the decisions will be made by the many. At least in time.
This is why I am hoping that people buy-in and power up for the future as the more that do, the more distributed the decision making becomes, the wider the range of content will get supported and, the more attractive it becomes for users who could benefit in multiple ways but, just don't know about it yet or, still think it is too risky or a scam.
I think that in the coming months and couple of years, the platform needs to start finding some stars of Steem, users who can demonstrate what is possible and where it is heading without losing themselves along the way, able to keep their ego in check.
It is not easy I'd say of someone goes from near nothing to near everything but, there will definitely be a lot of Steem Cinderella stories to come and, I might even be considered one of them one day.
What I think people should consider is that while we might not be doing it pretty, we are changing the world and the way value is established. The economies of the world are shifting and what is known today will eventually break catastrophically beyond any kind of savior. Each of us is ground floor in and have front row seats for the show that is to arrive. We all have a ticket.
Yes, people have left Steem and whether they come back or not, it doesn't matter because, who is left here now is the foundation that is going to set the course for the future of Steem, the people who made it through the lows and still kept working toward the highs. This consolidation of the community will happen at every trough but the growth of the foundation will increase at each also.
Never has there been so much Steem distributed as widely as there is now and, tomorrow it will spread a little further again. While some earn highly today, another could take the position tomorrow but hopefully everyone holds a little for the future because, owning an asset is vital and as I have said, Steem is versatile. Owning Steem is access to all forms of interaction that the infrastructure can and ever will hold.
Owning Steem is more than your voice, it is your breath on the platform - and it powers the next steps.
Taraz
[ a Steem original ]
(posted from phone)
Yes team is helping to set the stage for exciting things to come. But it's one of many players out there together they work for change. Thanks for sharing your article @ tarazkp
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Many players are needed, this is larger than any single blockchain in my opinion (and others) as there are just far too many applications and numbers that will be leveraging them. The decentralization of resources has to go over the borders of any one name.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I would like @steemit to extend the max Savings period from 3 days up to 3 months, with the ability to extend the 3 month Savings period every day with the use of a Bot.
If @aggroed @ned @elipowell @thecryptodrive or any of the Power Players on Steem can make that happen, the SBD could eventually be more safe to hold than $USD in a Bank due to Bank's fractional reserve policy.
The only thing stopping me from storing some of my savings in SBD is the fact that the Savings period is only 3 days and could theoretically be hacked and withdrawn before I'd time to recover my account.
I think this is especially true for people with a lot of money that needs storing @tarazkip. If you agree, please blog about this. It would be great to convert my Steem sales (in the future) to SBD and keep it on the blockchain as opposed to having to store it in a bank.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @chrisrice, personally i prefer to keep my funds powered up in Steem Power because it is locked safely for 13 weeks, I also suggest splitting funds to multiple accounts if you have alot of funds and you want to lower your risk profile.
Also there is a hidden interest you get on your Steem Power, not many people know about it, I think it is around 1.8% per annum.
The other reason I like Steem power as a savings tool is because you can use it for vote selling or delegate for a decent APR on markets such as https://minnowbooster.net and our brand new https://dlease.io app.
Holding Steem power also gives me the upside exposure to better Steem prices in future, SBD is safer from volatility but less likely than Steem to be pumped.
The idea of a user selectable SBD savings period is interesting but dev time can likely be used for more impactful things like SMT’s. I’ll run it past the internal slack anyway.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the feedback @thecryptodrive.
My interest in SBD having a longer savings period is based on my target price of $20 to $35 USD and I plan on selling 10% - 20% of my family's holdings in that price range so that I can lock in profits.
I would much rather hold USD in SBD than in a bank if that were to happen but I'd need there to be much longer savings period since 3 days it not enough.
I might be busy in those three days and if someone managed to hack my account and I was busy, all of my funds would likely be cleared from my SBD savings and there would be nothing I could do about it = not good.
But if Steemit Inc. or someone else like @therealwolf or even @buildteam could create the code before the next All-time-high.. SBD could likely compete with major banks (assuming the fundamentals for Steemit Inc. and @steem improved by a lot too.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I understand what you mean regarding a user selected safety period for SBD, I proposed it and no one was against it just that getting the dev resources to get it done is another story. It is risky for anyone other than Steemit inc to code it because there are no guarantees the pull request will be merged. Once we have the worker proposal in place then it is easier to push such agendas from a funding pool.
I am totally in agreement that holding SBD is a great hedge to fiat, even when SBD was lower than 1 USD I could still convert it for $1 USD worth of STEEM so it always holds its value irrespective of the peg.
I do however caution at your target price of SBD being $25, it was meant to maintain parity with the USD and the pump last year was a freak occurance which I don’t expect to be repeated, if it does likely a patch will be pushed to enable reverse conversions to help bring down the price. When SBD was even at 8 USD there was alot of heated discussion on how to bring it back down again. Negative interest rates could also be a tool but I’m not sure offhand if negative interest can be set on chain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The target price I mentioned is for Steem, not SBD.. and I agree with your assessment @thecryptodrive.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@chrisrice u don’t need to extend the savings period with a bot, the countdown only starts when you initiate the withdrawl.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Unrealistic expectations is one of the problems of why Steem has a retention problem. However for those that stick around long enough, Steem eventually becomes a community they come to accept, and maybe even a daily visit. As long as the roots are strong, a tree can recover from yearly pruning. I liken Steem to that tree.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep, the tree analogy you use is a good way to look at Steem I think. People who do stick around tend to have a lot of fun here in many different ways once they start moving focus from pure economics.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I remember what I found most annoying the last time a huge surge of users came back after being so busy with life is that within no time at all they were back up to earning what they always did and a lot of them were by no means decent content creators.
It actually caused quite a lot of resentment among people that they could just fade away when it was shit and waltz back in when things were good with impugnity.
I have resolved to be less welcoming to those types this time around, petty seeming I know but I do value those who value Steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think that this time around it might be a bit different as so many lease their steem out to bots (which is part of the reason those left in the first place) and the new dolphins have no idea who they are. I am going to be more critical of them at least too but then, I always have been :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hehe, I like that idea. Fingers crossed!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I wonder how many will come back and be pleasantly surprised on how the inflation alone has allowed then to increase their stake and earnings! I imagine there are also a couple that left their Steem Power delegated to a bot and may find some funds laying around!
Posted using Partiko iOS
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have a friend who disappeared for a long time and then came back near the ATH and was pretty excited by the difference :D
Not a bad way to go I guess for a passive income.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If they leave because the dollar value of their posts went down then that just means they do not get it
Posted using Partiko iOS
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, many don't really understand it or at least, don't look long enough on what is going on here to care. If the 7 day payout is their focus, prices will never be enough. What is interesting though is that those who were here when it was 6 cents understand that 1 dollar is still woth it while those who were here when it dropped from 2 to 1 dollar don't.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @tarazkp! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click here to view your Board
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
To support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness and get one more award and increased upvotes!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You got a 74.13% upvote from @ocdb courtesy of @tarazkp! :)
@ocdb is a non-profit bidbot for whitelisted Steemians, current max bid is 60 SBD and the equivalent amount in STEEM.
Check our website https://thegoodwhales.io/ for the whitelist, queue and delegation info. Join our Discord channel for more information.
If you like what @ocd does, consider voting for ocd-witness through SteemConnect or on the Steemit Witnesses page. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @tarazkp!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.286 which ranks you at #224 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 354 contributions, your post is ranked at #1. Congratulations!
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit