It doesn't put potential abusers at a disadvantage.
RE: Why I Advise Against Linear Reward
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Why I Advise Against Linear Reward
Why I Advise Against Linear Reward
It doesn't put potential abusers at a disadvantage.
yes it does
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Of course it does. They are more likely to be downvoted. Even if it isn't 100% guaranteed it pushes their incentives toward better (less likely to be downvoted) behavior
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Under crowdsourced flags, this isn't so.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Crowd-sourced? Compared to what?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'M really not sure I understood their crowdsource concept correctly but if so, flags would have a separate pool and would be non-linear.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I came up with the idea of independent flagging pool, Here's something I posted about it.
https://steemit.com/steem/@transisto/separate-downvoting-power-pool-concept-visualized
There is only one user involved when down-voting so there is no "crowd" per se.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No, you did not.
!shitpost
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit