It's always going to be difficult - you probably experience the same in your workplace. Fairness (or perceived fairness) is quite an interesting subject. Give too little, users feel they're unfairly treated. Give too much, users feel they're unfairly treated. There's been a time when I received votes that I didn't feel I deserved and vice-versa. Not just from sc01.
Similarly, I'm struggling to understand some of the "commenting" dynamics - especially with the DAO proposal I've been working on...
People would ignore my posts. Then when it's live, I'll get some feedback via one of the Wtnesses when I KNOW that the people providing the feedback know I'm working on it and sharing updates on the platform. Why don't they comment on my post? Preferably before something's gone live.
I guess we'll always be frustrated by things that we don't understand.
I feel you!
You’re absolutely right...there will always be one thing or another. But I’d like to conclude our discussion on a positive note: this chain has given us so much. If nothing else, it has given us valuable friendships, and I believe that is the most precious asset of all.
All my questions, rhetorical or otherwise, stem from the fact that deep down, I care for this blockchain. I don’t want it to turn into a graveyard of junk. I want to see quality thrive here by any means necessary. I don’t care about the vessel through which it happens, as long as it flourishes rather than diminishes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
True dat!
When I came close to leaving, there was a small group of people that kept checking in on me and they managed to suck me back in!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit