I agree with you that burning the downvotes reward would have been good incentive to downvote if it had been like that from a while ago. But today that would be too little too late.
Your Alice and Bob example assume both content are equally mediocre, in reality one has to be less mediocre and therefore of higher quality. It's a step in the right direction.
Since the financial incentives are the reasons for whales to vote and bidbot use, quality of content is irrelevant. Profiteers don't care.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash. You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is EXACTLY an example of how downvoting should not be used @Steemitblog @vandeberg. Real user commenting something true, retaliatory downvote by what seems to be a bot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What the fuck is @iflagtrash?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I flag trash (and morons). You have received a flag.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit