So, I recently retracted my statement I was convinced you had flagged for personal reasons connected to @drugwars. I note you have flagged this post, and provided no stated reason for it.
Given the nature of the post and that it mentioned you by name, it very strongly suggests you are flagging this post in retaliation for being disrespectful, insulting, or otherwise encouraging your personal ire.
I have been utterly forthright and so much so that I have issued a public apology for statements I made I based on recollections I now consider vague. Please step up and honestly concede this is a flag you flew for personal reasons, an opinion flag, or state reasonable cause to fly the flag.
Thank you.
Smidge has been harassing. libeling. and spamming. It's nothing personal.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I appreciate your substantive response. I am not aware of spamming from that account, but that is certainly a valid reason for flagging. I note Bernie does a lot of that. You're not flagging that group of accounts, however. Certainly no one, not even Bernie, would claim he doesn't harass and libel.
Consistency is the mark of integrity. Please apply your flags without prejudice and demonstrate that they don't fly, or not fly, because of personal reasons. I request you do so, and make no demands, but would note that Bernie has done a lot of harm to the Steem community, and discouraging flags from that vector would encourage capital gains.
Capital gains FTW.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit