I guess what's hard to imagine is the users who are already millionaires would, if they held become ... billionaires many times over... would they be trillionaires? anyways, it seems hard to imagine that.
RE: We Are Still Very Early In This Game - $6/Steem Is Cheap
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
We Are Still Very Early In This Game - $6/Steem Is Cheap
Hehe, that's a crazy thought! It would be so cool if we got a Steem billionaire here at one point.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
They'd be throwing around thousand dollar upvotes 😁
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Even higher! With a billion dollar worth of Steem Power, a single upvote would be worth $4912.22 ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If Steem's value multiplied by 1000, someone who has a $2.5 million stake today would have $2.5 billion. It's a lot, but still a fraction of Jeff Bezos or Bill Gates's net worth. They're worth around 100 billion each!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, if we're talking founders, @ned has 4+million steem itself, at 2200 that'd be, yeah I guess merely 10billion dollars or so.
Still. :O
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
lol that's not so bad I suppose 😂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And, seeing as it's 10 times less than those other bozos, the implication would be that the wealth is at least a little more spread around amongst the people who are making this platform what it is. I sure haven't gotten any monero from Facebook.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit