commit to burning their stake in the original STEEM chain, and have a zero balance of SP, STEEM and SBD by a certain deadline.
Why should I do that? That is a stupid authoritarian demand. No Bitcoin or Etherium fork demanded something that stupid.
I stopped reading at that point because your envision blockchain is just as authoritarian as @justinsunsteemit blockchains.
It's a straight out token swap to acticate you new chain funds. Extreme? Yes. Possible? Yes. Likely to work? Probably not. But it has openned up a fair amount of debate.
Calling the entire new chain authoritarian and stupid based on that single requirement is stupid in itself.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You want to force your will onto other people instead of giving people the right and liberty to chose for themselves — as every other blockchain spilt I know of did.
And thinking of it a little more: It's not even necessary. If @justinsunsteemit gets control over the chain he most likely make a token swap for TRON. The old STEEM token is likely to be gone anyway.
And speaking gone: What stops me from selling my STEEM or transferring it into newly created account before the deadline? You said it yourself:
BTW: If you look at my other comments I made in recent time: I'm in favour of a blockchain split. It's probably the only way forwards. It's just your “burn your steem” demand I oppose.
To too much a libertarian to accept such demands.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit