Yes writing for money does get you discouraged. But at the same time it is disheartening to see someone copy and paste a news article with 5 sentences do better than a piece you spent a day on. It's not that you are writing just for money, but there should be an easier way to find users content that really try https://steemit.com/steemit/@steemrollin/a-great-reputation-system-that-s-what-we-need makes a wonderful suggestion. A minnow with 5 stars or whatever system based on comments and posts should be able to be more visible than someone posting random nonsense
RE: Posts That Never Made It! - Let's discuss things and make it viral! -A second chance of exposure!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Posts That Never Made It! - Let's discuss things and make it viral! -A second chance of exposure!
That sort of system would probably work perfect on steemit. Hopefully they'll implement something like this in the nearest future. That, along with some changes in the filters would be perfect!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah at least some of the changes that need to be addressed are receiving some notice. Some sort of weekly video from the devs to let us know what is coming would be awesome or for them to tell us a topic they are thinking about changing and let people come up with some ideas to change it in a way that may not have been thought of before
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That would be awesome. I made a post 5 days ago about some features I would love.
You can find it here:
Steemit : Feature Suggestions, Alert Notifications & Popular Posts.
It's nothing major but I would have loved to get some sort of response from the devs, from @ned or @dantheman, that would have been great!
I do understand that these people can't watch every single thread being made, and definitely not upvote and comment everything they read. That just wouldn't work. But something like features should be monitored and commented. Well, that's my opinion at least. That way, the creator of the post (me in this scenario) and the readers would have got some sort of update about it at least.
And from what I've heard, people are trying to monitor everything at all times, but that seems a bit too much actually. I can understand how that might have worked with a couple of hundred members but with more than 40,000, which we have right now.. It's just impossible..
Just imagine when we reach 1 million users..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit