So in your opinion porn is a no no but rsacist comments like those sanders constantly posts those are fine by you
I never said either or or alluded to it, I asked what you would do.
Shows a lot
You're reaching, but are making example of what an idiot it by avoiding the unavoidable, or your equating censorship to curation and threats on one's life with petty meaningless threats.
There is a difference between curating content and downvoting everything somebody posts purely for the reason who says it
The difference is that one is censorship? Or you want to draw our own conclusion, so you can rely on implication instead on clear and common sense reasoning that isn't repugnant to the decency of sensibility.
There is no difference between curating content one way and another that changes from curation. People have a freedom to express how things are rated here, they get to decide, their rating it is the act of curation for them.
So don't play an idiot like you dont understand the issue
Idiots are as idiots do, are you calling me an idiot?
Ive kept the points short maybe will be easier to grasp for you
Yeah, you're calling me an idiot, how classic, the idiot is calling me an idiot, the freedom questioner is questioning me on freedom. You can do whatever you want except demonstrate how and why I'm playing an idiot without you being the idiot.
Eloquence doesnt make for moral rightness!
And its sad to see someone fall so low as to defending such actions as the example of I sent you
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you can demonstrate why and how that is so maybe it means something, untill then take your insinuations and shove them in the same place that resolves to say curation is censorship and petty, meaningless "threats" are threats on one's life.
Such actions as such actions that will remain forever veiled in the mystique of draw your own conclusion.
I never said either or or alluded to it, I asked what you would do.
Still no contention to that.
You're reaching, but are making example of what an idiot it by avoiding the unavoidable, or your equating censorship to curation and threats on one's life with petty meaningless threats.
No contention to that either.
The difference is that one is censorship? Or you want to draw our own conclusion, so you can rely on implication instead on clear and common sense reasoning that isn't repugnant to the decency of sensibility.
There is no difference between curating content one way and another that changes from curation. People have a freedom to express how things are rated here, they get to decide, their rating it is the act of curation for them.
Did your comment have anything to do with what I said?Do you have anything to say about what I said specifically and with clear reasoning?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit