You don't even understand the meaning of making threats on one's life and do whine about censorship in a place where censorship is impossible, under the implication that people aren't allowing others to read certain things, which is laughable itself as there's no way someone can stop anyone from reading what's published on steem or steemit.
RE: Steemit has spoken
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Steemit has spoken
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You cannot see the things that are curated as hidden, but anyone can reveal them.
To Idiots there's no nuance between censorship and curation or a threat on one's life and a threat of curating someone's account as shit: Try reading something that is ACTUALLY censored you idiot, tell me then that hiding content by default on a completely transparent and decentralized platform as a function of dealing with abuse as well as curating/rating content is the same as censoring content.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Look at me, I'm responding to idiots that think they are invisible or something, try responding to something that actually has been censored and learn not to be a total dickhead and claim people threatened your life when they were speaking figuratively about a meaningless metric on a platform that is literally built to withstand censorship First and Foremost.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'll take that as a full sentence, or a complete thought that begins with a pulled out of your ass statistic that still doesn't address the fact that Censorship is the complete removal and or editing of information itself, and will never be confused with rating things, because everyone knows that thumbdowning a comment in youtube comment section isn't the same as youtube removing the video the comments are under and will never be the same.
That still doesn't make curation censorship and I doubt you can back up what you said with actual history:
https://steemit.com/steem/@baah/there-is-no-censoring-on-steemit
In the same thread that user linked an article by dan, the one and ONLY creator of this platform, about his views on censorship.
Isn't it interesting that I can call you an idiot because you obtusely confuse a threat on one's life to a meaningless "threat" on the internet regarding the rating our community has bestowed onto someone and coincidentally you construe a system for curation on a censorship-proof and imbued with freedom of expression social media platform for a centralized and systemic mechanism of obfuscating and outright removing and or altering information by the state or it's sisters the corporations while you think casting shade on my characther at this point with your lackluster judgements of my mental capacity does anything for your argument that I am reading something that I shouldn't be able to see, as per your imbecilic and obtuse insinuation?
That was also a complete thought.
Clearly you ascribe to the obtuse realm where threats on one's life are the same thing as someone commenting about your reputation and censorship to you is the same as rating something 1 star on Amazon, because it's simply the act of making it harder to obtain information. Censorship, therefore, is making it harder by making things that are conceived as abusive by default hidden. Tell me, what would you do to people like me, and bernie and all others, would you ban me? would you limit what I can say? what about people that spam porn in users comments, should those be visible and at the top as they were first to comment?
I hope you don't dwelve into full blown idiot and take my hand of reason to pull yourself out of this quagmire you so mistakenly see yourself as righteous in.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What is the problem here? How would I like that? I expect you can phrase what the problem is clearly and concisely without implicating that we are the same in our Likes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Bullying other users in by telling them what they can and can't upvote
I really didn't think it needed further explanations
Buy seems you'll find an eloquent way of explaining how its ok
So whats the point
Waste of my time
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Has the internet bullied you by telling you something? Did they force themselves on you?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What is the point, what would you want to happen now? After I acknowledge how much the internet has harmed you, what then, what would you want to do now?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yet you focused on the part of a quote that was a speculative bit and not on the vivid experience that user shared on what he thinks about people calling curation censorship, which I guess you agree with?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am defending rationale and reason itself, not any one person. You wouldn't ban me but you didn't answer what you would do either.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I never said either or or alluded to it, I asked what you would do.
You're reaching, but are making example of what an idiot it by avoiding the unavoidable, or your equating censorship to curation and threats on one's life with petty meaningless threats.
The difference is that one is censorship? Or you want to draw our own conclusion, so you can rely on implication instead on clear and common sense reasoning that isn't repugnant to the decency of sensibility.
There is no difference between curating content one way and another that changes from curation. People have a freedom to express how things are rated here, they get to decide, their rating it is the act of curation for them.
Idiots are as idiots do, are you calling me an idiot?
Yeah, you're calling me an idiot, how classic, the idiot is calling me an idiot, the freedom questioner is questioning me on freedom. You can do whatever you want except demonstrate how and why I'm playing an idiot without you being the idiot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Eloquence doesnt make for moral rightness!
And its sad to see someone fall so low as to defending such actions as the example of I sent you
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you can demonstrate why and how that is so maybe it means something, untill then take your insinuations and shove them in the same place that resolves to say curation is censorship and petty, meaningless "threats" are threats on one's life.
Such actions as such actions that will remain forever veiled in the mystique of draw your own conclusion.
I never said either or or alluded to it, I asked what you would do.
Still no contention to that.
You're reaching, but are making example of what an idiot it by avoiding the unavoidable, or your equating censorship to curation and threats on one's life with petty meaningless threats.
No contention to that either.
The difference is that one is censorship? Or you want to draw our own conclusion, so you can rely on implication instead on clear and common sense reasoning that isn't repugnant to the decency of sensibility.
There is no difference between curating content one way and another that changes from curation. People have a freedom to express how things are rated here, they get to decide, their rating it is the act of curation for them.
Did your comment have anything to do with what I said?Do you have anything to say about what I said specifically and with clear reasoning?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit