This a bad idea. I know you guys want to reward steemians for staying and keep posting good content but this will promote the abuse. This same thing was implemented in weku and it was a disaster. This will bring circle jerking, voting the same people over and over, just the "pals" will be voted and posts with ridiculous amount that wasn't even checked for plagiarism, stolen content or proper sourcing will get juicy rewards. This is not the way to make things better. If you're doing this to please people, just stop. If you're out of ideas ask the community how to improve the place and then explore those possibilities with your team. What you're doing lately is a recipe for destruction. Think before you act and hey, this is coming from me, a person that has been neutral the whole time. We all want both places to be successful. Start doing things properly so steemit finally becomes the place it was supposed to be!
RE: 100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 3 – The Community Curators Project
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 3 – The Community Curators Project
Actually you are wrong @blacklux.
I don't know how was it done on weku. Perhaps there was no centralized power, no "big brother" watching.
STINC will be monitoring those few curating projects and weekly reports will be necessary. I'm managing @project.hope (which was selected to receive STINC support) and all I can think of is: how can I bring more value into STEEM, to ensure that my invested money and time (hundreds of hours so far) will not go to waste.
This is the only way to make things better. To empower strong community leaders and to control their actions.
Yours, Piotr
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit