- Limiting rewards per account won't help as one can crate the whole lot of accounts and distribute SP among them.
- You'll get what you pay for. If you pay half a dollar for low-effort monnow post you will get tons and tons of low posts.
- I believe flagging is an essential part of the platform.
RE: Hey Steemit Whales, How'd You Like To Fix All Of Steemit's Problems And Make Bank By Doing Absolutely Nothing?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hey Steemit Whales, How'd You Like To Fix All Of Steemit's Problems And Make Bank By Doing Absolutely Nothing?
Limiting vest per post would lower rewards per post and would make creating multiple account moot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Answers:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sounds good to me... But problem is these need to get discussed in steemfests and meetups, then partying or ass kissing.. Steemfests seems like "Bilderberg" to me..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's probably true.
Bildelberg. LoL
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Flagging needs to be encouraged not removed. There has to be a way of dusting the spammers
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What about whales removing personal grudges on good content if someone tells them that they have posted shit, i have seen that happening. They go to their page, and start flagging their posts, which are not bad content at all.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Present rules give them such power so they use it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That needs to be changed..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If there was a limit on how much vest a whale can use to uvpote/downvote then the karma could get rebalanced by upvoters.
https://steemit.com/steem/@snowflake/history-is-a-great-teacher
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What about limiting how many times per week/month 1 users votes count towards another?
For example, if I upvote your comment or post today then upvote your comment or post tomorrow, the vote tomorrow doesn't count. This could help prevent bots from voting for the same user over and over again.
Of course it does have the problem of "just make more accounts." Perhaps it could be IP based as well? It wouldn't completely solve the problem but it could help mitigate it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
IP based voting maybe could work on a Steemit.com or a busy.org level. But not on the blockchain.
Anyone could fork the steemit sourcecode from github, and run his or hers own server.
That wouldn't be overly difficult for the people who are currently gaming the system.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That makes sense. Thank you for the expansion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit