What Deserves To Be On Trending? What Is Trash and What Is Not?

dineroconopcion (64) in steemit • 7 years ago (edited)

This post is a reply to @berniesanders Post:
Time to start flagging the "trending" trash...

I've to admit, like most people in Steemit I'm here to make some income. If you say that you are here because you love this platform you are full of shit my friend. Everyone's here to make some money be it small amounts or big. Don't believe me ask @yallapapi
Introducing #SharkSchool - How To Take Over The Trending Page By Being A Bloodthirsty Savage

This was my reply to @berniesanders

@ausbitbank Downvote one of my post and yes it deserved to be downvote because it was a promo post. The other post that he says isn't better is thist one:
The ABYSS | Next Generation Digital Distribution Platform

I use to think that Steemit was a platform in which we were able to share and talk about the things that we like and have interest on with the possibility to earn some income in the form of Steem/SBD/SP, but it seems that in reality we are only able to get to Trending things approved by whales like berniesanders and @ausbitbank ?

I responded to @ausbitbank with some facts to which he didn't reply because he knows that I'm right. @rightscomet suggest me to make a post about it and get it to Trending so I will do just that.

I delete my comment on Bernies's post and will share it here to see if we can get berniesanders and @ausbitbank to answer, I doubt it thought because Whales don't like to be confront, they don't like to be attack in public because then their image of nice guys go to shit.

"Dear @ausbitbank, steem is another shitcoin (As everything besides Bitcoin is a shitcoin, right?), and yet here we are. You are just a hypocrite. Calling something a shitcoin just because you are an ignorant fuck doesnt make it a shitcoin. It seems that whales just want all the benefit for themselves. You see whales accounts like @berniesanders and @grumpycat downvoting the small guys using bidbots and yet whales accounts and their whales friends get a fucking free pass?

This is a list of trash on the trending page and explanation of why it is fucking trash:
1 Hots or Shots Episode 4 with guest @richardcrill

Trash because I couldnt care anyless about two guys doing shots.

2 How to create a bounty

Trash because that is an app that nobody ask for.

3 @smartsteem - the smartest bid-bot available

Trash because they just want to promote their service, that is clear, isn't it?, If I make a bid bot and get on trending to promote it will it be fine for you oh great steemit police?, What is the different of a bid bot promoting their service and someone promoting an ICO that they like?, What is the fucking different you stupid hypocrite?

4 Pretty girls and fast cars in Melbourne's Formula 1

Trash because I don't like formula 1 and not enough "pretty girls" on the post, so misleading title.

5 Steem Witness Forum: @andrarchy, @roelandp, @clayop, @aggroed, @klye, @lukestokes, @drakos

Trash because why the fuck does that deserve to be on trending?, Do you see? Are you going to tell me that those 5 posts deserve to be on Trending? Why haven't you downvote them? Because they are your little friends that give you benefits? because you are a hypocrite asshole playing a nice guy when in fact you are just another greedy fuck that don't want others to benefit from this stupid platform?

Don't play almighty when in fact you are just another greedy piece of shit"

What is trash for a person, might be trash for another and that is why 1 person shouldn't be to decide what is trash and what is not trash.

That should be enough to get either of them to answer. berniesanders and @ausbitbank might/will downvote this post, their whales friend will downvote this post, but that is OK. My income don't depend on Steemit. For Steemit to get better things need to change, and @compleatgamester has some good ideas on how it should be

Comment's Link

Don't say that everything is fine with Steemit when in fact only big accounts/Whales are able to benefit from the platform and able to do whatever the fuck they want to do. The last thing I want is going to war against people that I know I wont be able to fight. @berniesanders is able to threat and destroy people easily because he has many accounts full of Steem Power. All these are some of his accounts:

I know this because everything downvote by @berniesanders get downvote by those accounts
https://i.gyazo.com/73148325d3b2d35969a33bda94cd42e5.mp4

So, berniesanders and @ausbitbank is this Post Trash too? Is this a Shitpost?, If yes, why?, Because you don't like it? We will be waiting for your almighty answers 😘

Update March 31, 2018 12:38AM EST Time
Our friend @ausbitbank didnt want to join our discussion, so sad

That is one of the many funny things about Steemit Whales, when you confront them in public they say that you are doing a tantrum or ranting but the reality is that they won't answer when they are on the wrong. Because I call our dear friend @ausbitbank on his almighty police bullshit he is not brave enough to answer. He said that he doesn't benefit from downvoting but as soon as I get this post on Trending, and believe me I will, he will come and flag so that he gets rewards from it.

And to be honest this might be the last post that I will use bidbots for, it just isn't worth it. Hopefully in the future Steemit developers @ned @dan or whoever is in charge of this shit show will do an update that benefit the whole community and now only the Top Dogs accounts. If you believe that you will be able to earn money in Steemit without investing money you are wrong. Whales run this place since day one and that is how it will be unless they make major updates that change how things work on this place.

Update March 31, 2018 3:18AM EST Time

Market is a bit boring now days and I can't sleep. Naturally I came to read comments on this post, upvote people, and them when to look good stuff to read on Trending, hehe. Jokes aside I found this post by my future friend @berniesanders (we are not friend yet, but we will be, he doesn't know it yet.)
DO ANY OF THESE WITNESSES DO ANYTHING?

I was not surprised, but happy to see the confirmation that @ausbitbank is just a useless greedy fuck!

I knew the guy was full of bullshit the moment he called me a son of bitch!, just kidding I knew way before that. When I confront him on discord and he told me that he can only down vote so many people, fucking liar cunt! Hope he lost his witness status and get lost from this place poor fuck.

In other words,

There is not enough SP for flagging all my whales friends posting shit and getting it on trending, so I only flag people that I dont know like you Francis. I don't flags my friends, only small fishes like you, understand?

Wow this post is getting better and better by the hour! This is pure quality content 100% original and full of truth! This post will make me Steemit famous! I bet the @walden will love this post, right bro?, Come and join the party and leave your honest opinion on this matter

After reading @berniesanders posts I'm liking him more and more, so I will keep on stalking him and hopefully get to talk to him man to man.

Update March 31, 2018 1:07PM EST Time

I waited 21 hours before using bidbots on this post; Share on Youtube, Twitter, Facebook. Over 1,000 organic views, and yet only $7+ worth of votes and that is including mine. Only a hand full of people is willing to vote your content, even if they agreed with you. Only a hand full of people is willing to re steem something, and that is why without bid bots and Whales friends, earning decent money in Steemit current state is impossible.

Getting on Trending without using Bidbots and without Whales friends is impossible. If it isn't prove me wrong and I will give you 100 SBD, I just don't care about money. It's just a tool to have a better life and be able to help others, hence me upvoting everyone in this post 100% until my Steem Power runs out. Have a wonderful Saturday, this might be last update, maybe.

Update March 31, 2018 9:13PM EST Time
Ok guys I empty my Voting Power upvoting people replies on this Post. Thanks to everyone that participate and left their honest opinion on this matters. I won't be upvoting any more comments. If you comment don't expect Upvotes. With that say, you are free to say what ever you want if you want to call me a dickhead, idiot, savior, etc go ahead as I do not get affect by people's opinions of me

Sorry if anyone got offended by this post, not my fault that you are a weak minded fuck that get offended so easily. Grow up and don't be such a cry baby for fuck's sake! To people downvoting just because

Image Source

Image Source

That is how much I care about you and your downvotes

This was the last Post of mine in which I use bid bots, so no need to cry about seeing me on Trending ever again, blah blah

Image Source

Ps: I will be upvoting every comment on this post with 100% vote until I run out of voting power because I just dont care. Im not a greedy fuck like @ausbitbank and the rest of his whale friends, I like to give back, that is me. But there is a catch, I will only upvote honest comments, stating your honest opinion on this matter. You do not have to agreed with me, just your honest comment well explained. Saying Thank you, nice post, etc Don't count!

steemit blog life freedom speech

7 years ago by dineroconopcion (64)

$720.89

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!

Sort Order:

Trending

[-]

yallapapi (70) · 7 years ago

My name is @yallapapi and I approve this message

$12.19

[-]

rajibhalder (37) · 7 years ago (edited)

upvote and resteem done

$4.41

7 votes

[-]

karinavb (42) · 7 years ago

Definitely, this post is full of reason, a single person can not decide what is trash and no, I agree with your position, and whoever thinks different is what you said, a true hypocrite!

$4.32

6 votes

[-]

nonameslefttouse (74) · 7 years ago

Can a single person decide what is good? That's what individuals are doing when they purchase votes like this to reach the trending page.

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

karinavb (42) · 7 years ago (edited)

So being on the trending page for you is synonymous with, a "good" post?
That is precisely what he is saying, there are many post in the trending that are "trash".
And then, what for me is good for you can be garbage, a single person can not have in their hands the power to say if something is garbage or not. We already know what this is called, freedom of expression is necessary, suggestions can be given without imposing and punishing.
What do you think about this? Because with your question I do not know what position you are in, and apologize for my bad English.

$0.00

3 votes

[-]

nonameslefttouse (74) · 7 years ago (edited)

Trending content is something that is receiving high ratings. This "good or bad" nonsense is irrelevant. Trending content is something that is making people look, then more people, and more people. This happens naturally. More and more people discover they ENJOY something, and it starts to trend. Again, good and bad mean nothing.

Many of you don't understand the business you're in.

If one person cannot decide something is trash(that's true) then another cannot decide what's good. When someone buys their votes and pushes their content to the top of trending, that is ONE person deciding if something is good or bad. That's not how a trending page works. These INDIVIDUALS are pushing poor quality content UP, and someone wants to flag it DOWN.

My position is: this place has a flaw, people exploit the flaw in design, then pout when things don't go their way. The flags are there to help prevent these things from happening. It's not about good or bad content. It's more about people exploiting a flaw.

Trending content is something popular with the people. I can look at the trending page on Youtube if I feel like it. I won't enjoy everything there, but it's a good indication of what many people seem to be enjoying at the time. Those trending videos are not in those slots because that account paid for it to be there. The biggest mistake people here are making with their content is paying for it to be on the trending page. That action typically makes their content unpopular rather than popular and they are paying money to shoot themselves in the foot simply because they do not understand this business.

$0.19

2 votes

[-]

cryptojiang (60) · 7 years ago

The whales want to stay on top. Don't mind them stay on the grind!

$4.30

5 votes

[-]

dineroconopcion (64) · 7 years ago

Everyone should be able to stay on top without fear of getting flag by whales just because.

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

scottychams (61) · 7 years ago

As more people join Steemit their vote is worth less and less, so ideally in the future it will be spread out (bidbots won't be viable) so as that trending comment will require a much larger portion of the steemit audience to actually care enough to upvote you.

$2.12

3 votes

[-]

yoneidernovoa (55) · 7 years ago (edited)

Ok @dineroconopcion esta es mi mas sincera y honesta opinión.

No respondo con insultos a una persona que me llega con insultos, como dice un dicho: "No llegues al mismo nivel que un ignorante, obviamente te ganara porque el es mas ignorante que tu"

Pero al mismo tiempo entiendo tu molestia, porque soy nuevo en esta plataforma y trabajo duro para estar aquí, cometo errores y aprendo de ellos. Para que despues llegue un codicioso y aproveche tus deseos de prosperar, eso me molesta y bastante, al igual que tu lo confronto con ideas claras y precisas.

Soy nuevo en esta red social pero mis deseos de aprender son grandes, y pienso al igual que tu que debería haber una actualización frente a este tema. El contenido debe ser de calidad no basura que con Bidbots genere altas ganancias, el esfuerzo se debe valorar y reconocer mas que la mediocridad, adoptar una postura Aristócrata es la mejor manera de decirlo.

Saludos!

$2.94

7 votes

[-]

fireonxas (50) · 7 years ago

@dineroconopcion tremendo post, estoy de acuerdo contigo, steemit por mas que no lo queramos admitir lo usamos porque queremos generar dinero :/, muchos decimos y me incluyo "lo uso porque me gusta ayudar y ya no solo ganar sbd" PURA MENTIRA. La realidad es que todos queremos ganar en steemit y en realidad en steemit deberiamos generar todos aquellos usuarios que en realidad si gastan energia y esfuerzo en crear un buen póst ya sea de: tutoriales,tecnologia,musica etc.

Por otra parte las ballenas (claro que no todas¡) son egoistas y abusan de su poder generandoce miles de dolares en post que no tienen sentido, aveses nisiquieran son capases de votar a los comentarios de sus usuarios tan averisiosos son >:(.

En fin, steemit si fuera diferente, todos creceriamos pero como en el mundo real, la avaricia y el poder corrompen. saludos dineroconopcion

$2.67

4 votes

[-]

dgvictor (42) · 7 years ago (edited)

francis amigo, te sigo hace mas de 2 meses, desde que me uní al grupo de discord, empece a mirar todos tus vídeos y publicaciones, y el problema de las ballenas son ellas, osea quieren gobernar esta plataforma dando bandera para bajar la reputación de otros usuarios. Use por mucho tiempo el TAG de cervantes y jamas me voto ... mendigamos un voto !! UN VOTO !! Me considero novato, pero entiendo que para hacer una buena publicación se necesita buen contenido, buena ortografía y buen manejo en la edición de textos. Y he visto votos de ballenas a memes ! SI A MEMES! chicas casi desnudas ... con sus pechos al aire! no me quiero extender. Te doy la razón y te comprendo. Si algún día llegare a hacer alguien importante ( aunque lo dudo) en Steemit votare con coherencia a TODOS! Me dedico al diseño gráfico y eso es lo que mas publico, cuesta mucho cuando las ballenas te ignoran. Pero esto es como la calle, gobiernan aquellos que someten y generan el miedo a la gente, parece que en Steemit pasa algo igual. Votado y reestemeado. Saludos desde Argentina.

$2.62

5 votes

[-]

criptoar (64) · 7 years ago (edited)

We are hundreds of thousands of small users in steemit, but we are only thinking about a whale voting us, that is the thought that we have to change and I include myself.
It is the personal ego that we always want more and we always expect that whale to vote for us.
We are more thinking about personal success, looking for more money instead of thinking about "growing a collective thought that makes everyone grow together", that should be the goal of a collective network

Somos cientos de miles los pequeños usuarios en steemit, pero solo estamos pensando en que una ballena nos vote, ese es el pensamiento que tenemos que cambiar y me incluyo.
Es el ego personal que siempre queremos mas y siempre esperamos que esa ballena nos vote.
Estamos mas pensando mas en el exito personal, buscando obtener mas dinero en lugar de pensar en "hacer crecer un pensamiento colectivo que haga crecer en conjunto a todos", ese deberia ser el objetivo de una red colectiva

$0.00

3 votes

[-]

criptoar (64) · 7 years ago

La guerra entre ballenas desvirtua el objetivo de steemit que es aportar ideas, debatirlas mejorarlas y crecerentre todos. Desmotiva a los usuarios y a la larga se pierde el interes en comentar y participar.

Porque dijo eso porque los unicos perjudicados son los que comentan aportan se ganan unos centavos y despues viene alguien y te los quita con una bandera o voto negativo.
Se siente frustracion, enojo y eso a la larga cansa y desmotiva al usuario.

Todos queremos ser reconocidos con votos y con steem por nuestro esfuerzo de realizar una publicacion o comentario. Se invierte mucho tiempo en contestar o realizar un post que aporte

Steemit necesita cambiar las reglas de la plataforma para que se logre ese objetivo.

Y los votos negativos, que no dejan crecer, a los que aportan contenido con sus comentarios y post, son uno de esos cambios.

The war between whales distorts the goal of steemit, which is to contribute ideas, debate them to improve them and grow together. It discourages users and eventually loses interest in commenting and participating.

Because he said that because the only ones who are hurt are those who comment, they earn a few cents and then someone comes and takes them away with a flag or negative vote.
You feel frustrated, angry and that eventually tires and demotivates the user.

We all want to be recognized with votes and with steem for our effort to make a publication or comment. A lot of time is spent in answering or making a post that contributes

Steemit needs to change the rules of the platform to achieve that goal.

And the negative votes, that do not allow to grow, to those who contribute content with their comments and post, are one of those changes

$2.47

4 votes

[-]

giorgiobtc (45) · 7 years ago (edited)

Es verdad que hay bastante contenido de mierda en steemit, fuera bueno que se hiciera algo al respecto, pero teniendo lineamientos bien definidos para que no sea injusto, y como dices en tu post y concuerdo lo que puede ser basura para unos puede que no lo sea para otros usuarios, los que estamos aquí venimos a ganar un ingreso pasivo yo por lo menos pienso a futuro que este tiempo que le dedico a steemit en uno o 2 años se convierta en un atractivo ingreso pero es lamentable que los usuarios de rango más alto hagan lo que les da la gana, para beneficiarse solo ellos. Por lo menos steemit todavía esta en fase beta y esperemos que los desarrolladores de esta plataforma mejoren y tomen las opiniones sobre estos asuntos para que las ballenas no perjudiquen a los que recién empiezan o van creciendo, eso es algo muy injusto en la nueva era de la descentralización.

It is true that there is enough content of shit in steemit, it was good to do something about it, but having guidelines well defined so that it is not unfair, and as you say in your post and I agree what can be rubbish for some may not be for other users , those of us here come to earn a passive income I at least think to the future that this time I dedicate to steemit in one or two years becomes an attractive income but it is unfortunate that users of higher rank do what they want , to benefit only them. At least Steemit is still in beta and hopefully the developers of this platform will improve and take the opinions on these issues so that the whales do not harm those who just start or grow, that is something very unfair in the new era of decentralization

$2.40

3 votes

[-]

miguelvargas (59) · 7 years ago (edited)

Estimado Francis @dineroconopcion.

Lamento que mi inglés no sea lo suficientemente elevado como para realizar este post en ese idioma y hacerlo de manera gramaticalmente correcta; si me hubiera gustado hacerlo así para llegar a más personas mi opinión.

Conocí a Steemit gracias a una amiga, luego me puse a investigar y te conocí en Youtube. Gracias a mi esfuerzo puro y duro logré ser parte del equipo de trinity en tu comunidad de Discord. Me beneficio de tu generosidad, vivo en Venezuela y actualmente tu gesto representa como un 50% de mis ganancias totales, sin ese porcentaje sería imposible para mí alimentarme.

Luego de esa introducción, te agradezco, pero yo no vengo acá a jalarte bolas pues esa vaina me obstina en sobremanera cuando los veo en los chat de discord y por supuesto, en las casillas de comentarios de las ballenas egoístas.

Te doy la razón en gran parte de lo que dices, no me voy a detener en repetir tus puntos, voy directo a lo que opino que pasa. A pesar que soy super nuevo en Steemit, me atrevo a decir que los abusos de las ballenas siempre han existido. La utopía de la descentralización perfecta y armoniosa la veo muy lejos hermano. Los que tengan mas plata van a pisar a los más débiles si o si; de repente sale un loco como tu de vez en cuando queriendo hacer algo, pero no son la mayoría y para mejor muestra el top 20 que hizo @berniesanders.

Yo creo que hay que cambiar el sistema de downvotes, no creo que se deba quitar, pero si creo que debe dejar de afectar la reputación del autor y en su lugar, afectar la reputación de los curadores. Eso traerá curadores más responsables y hará que los bid-bots tengan que programar maneras de sólo recibir dinero de gente que hace contenido de calidad. Con eso, se evita el spam porque le quitas rial a la persona que lo hace, pero le quitas también visibilidad al que apoyo el contenido basura.
También creo que debe obligarse de alguna manera a que se delegue sp si o si a medida de x´s cantidad, que la capacidad de curación no quede entre unos cuantos que se autovotan entre ellos.

Sumado a esas dos propuestas, me dirijo a ti y a tu manera de decir las cosas.

Te recuerdo que dije que te doy la razón en casi todo lo que dices; sin embargo, estoy en completo desacuerdo en la manera en que lo haces. Por qué? porque primero, te rebajas al nivel de la basura que esta jodiendo a Steemit y segundo, pero mucho mas importante; alejas a las personas que como yo no saben nada del peo. Mira, si yo no te conociera, sino conociera a la maravilla de todo el equipo de DCO, yo diría "verga, que carajo tan mad en la vida" y ya, ni siquiera me detendría a analizar si lo que dices tiene sentido o no; porque lamentablemente el ser humano anda es pendiente de lo malo, del chisme y no del contenido importante.

Aquí el contenido importante es la denuncia, hay que hacer algo, no sé que coño pero hay que algo, porque no podemos seguir dejandonos joder por un pequeño grupo de oligarcas y un coñazo de gente jalabolas que les tiene miedo, cuando yo me parto el culo escribiendo literatura y análisis que me cuestan hroas de mi vida y me generan 0.2 sbd.

Tienes mi apoyo y mi insignificante voto, busca la manera de decir mejor las cosas, yo se que eres un carajo frontal y honesto que no anda con indirectas y eso yo lo aprecio, pero cuando relaciones públicas y psicología de masas se trata, no sirve. Llámalo populismo, hipocresía o lo que quieras, pero es lo que funciona... qué se le va ser si la gente es así...

$2.29

3 votes

[-]

marekkaminski (49) · 7 years ago

My answer to another post - regarding steemit - can perfectly fit here.
I will not paste it - so don't want to spam - I leave just the link
And graphics (to attract attention)

Steem needs you..jpg

$1.95

5 votes

[-]

rasor (49) · 7 years ago

Glad I read this before those arseholes downvote it to censorship, keep doing what you like and fuck them.

$1.93

4 votes

[-]

pequef (59) · 7 years ago

Primeramente gracias por dejarme formar parte (miembro) de DCO, aportas contenido bastante útil para muchos y dentro de comunidad (Discord) ayudan mucho a los nuevos como yo.

Muy de acuerdo contigo en cuanto a que usamos Steemit para generar ingresos y no por amor, en la diversificación esta el éxito. Con respecto a los downvotes que te dan yo creo que es algo mas personal de esos usuarios ¿que tiene en tu contra? no sabemos.

Desde el momento que decidimos registrarnos en esta plataforma aceptamos sus reglamentos, el cual me parece es bastante fácil de cumplir, mientras el post cumpla con las reglas de Steemit NO DEBERIA haber ningún tipo de problema, pero hay personas que llevan las cosas al extremo o mejor dicho son personas caprichosas que solo le gusta que los demás hagan las cosas a su manera, ballenas las cuales quieren implementar sus propias reglas en una plataforma "descentralizada" solo para el beneficio de ellos mismo (PROPIO) en vez de utilizar su poder de voto para de verdad limpiar la plataforma. Con lo que no estoy de acuerdo es generar un downvote solo porque no les guste algún tipo de contenido posteado ¿por que lo hacen? capricho como ya lo mencione antes, solo porque no se hacen las cosas como ellos digan.

Lamentándolo mucho acá el poder lo tienen los que invierten MUCHO DINERO en sus cuentas, lo peor de todo es que todo ese poder no lo utilizan para ayudar a otros sino para destruir "contenido que no les guste a ellos" así el contenido cumpla con las reglas impuestas por la plataforma Steemit.

Post BASURA, si hay muchos "que no cumplen con el reglamento Steemit (en los que de verdad se deberían enfocar las ballenas) Post MUY BUENOS también los hay y de diferentes autores. Es ahí donde las ballenas deberían aportar a la comunidad y recompensar a quienes hacen un excelente trabajo para la comunidad.

En esta plataforma todos somos libres de publicar lo que nos guste, recordemos que quizás lo que a mí me guste también le puede gustar a otro usuario, o lo que publique otro usuario me puede gustar a mí. ¿quiénes son esas ballenas para juzgar mi publicación, la tuya o de un compañero? ¿acaso estamos sentamos en una corte frente a un juez que dictara una sentencia en nuestra contra? Si a mí no me gusta un post de algún miembro de la plataforma simplemente lo ignoro (siempre y cuando cumpla con las reglas de steemit) CADA PERSONA TIENE GUSTOS DIFERENTES, ¿quién coño son esas ballenas para criticarme o criticar a otros?

dejare el link de un post que publique hace unos días, por si lo quieren leer. Habla un poco sobre este tema que estamos tratando >> https://steemit.com/spanish/@pequef/steemit

$1.66

3 votes

[-]

steemingmark (55) · 7 years ago

Its great to see peoples opinions it means people give a shit we need to propel this to make a better platform not a school playground.

$1.60

2 votes

[-]

steemingmark (55) · 7 years ago

Thanks @dineroconopcion my second biggest upvote ever =}

$0.00

[-]

steemingmark (55) · 7 years ago

And it got me too 41 rep

$0.00

[-]

moiscapsesii (59) · 7 years ago

Dicen que el dinero mueve el mundo, pero las masas también pueden lograr esto ultimo, una unidad solida y creciente como los iniciados en esta plataforma podrían desestabilizar el monopolio de las ballenitas egoístas, crear un nuevo circulo de beneficiados es lo mejor donde las ballenas estén fuera de esto y el crecimiento sea sano e igual para todos.

bueno vamos a darle duro con eso, poco a poco subiendo poder miles de ratones pueden contra un elefante o no?
Soy muy nuevo en esto y precisamente estoy aquí por ti, un revolucionario queriendo luchar contra un sistema que se aprovecha de muchos para darle beneficio a pocos.
Fiel a DCO!!!

Dco[1].jpg

MINUTO 0.41 DEL VIDEO "QUIEN ES EL FRANCIS???"
canal de youtube "DineroConOpciones.com" video epico

$0.99

15 votes

[-]

freebornangel (73) · 7 years ago

That little ausie bitch muted me a long time ago, didnt like confronting the truth, I guess.
Poor behavior for a top witness, if you ask me.
Welcome to the shit list,...

$0.95

2 votes

[-]

dineroconopcion (64) · 7 years ago

hehe ausie bitch, that made me lol. That guy can't handle confrontations, such an ausie bitch

$0.03

1 vote