I voted for your article, not because I agree with you, but because I want to encourage you to write and think. Imagine you are standing in front of a building and can only look in one window. You must decide the purpose of the building from this one glimpse. By looking in one window you might surmise that the building is used to prepare food; another window indicates the building is used for sleeping; another window shows a scene best left unsaid (it involves sitting down, groaning noises, and holding one's nose). There is a level of truth in any perspective.
One of my stances is that when people voice opinions, they need to provide citations and context.
If we do not "change our ways" soon our planet will become a barren wasteland like Mars within the next 100-150 years with the only life left on this planet being sub-surface microbes.
Do you have a scientific paper that you are referencing when you make that statement or is it an amalgam of a number of media sources that have shaped your opinion?
I have added a particularly interesting video (in my opinion) in this post. I don't want to change your opinion. It might be interesting to incorporate some of the information there into your perspective.
My writings are almost always an amalgamation of information from dozens (maybe even hundreds) of sources sprinkled with my own thoughts, opinions and intellect. I am one of those people (some call Dreamers) who is always thinking, imagining.....not of idyllic things but of problems and their possible solutions. I run thousands of different scenarios through my mind on a daily basis (largely subconsciously now) and when I find a scenario with a possible solution it gets moved to the forefront of my mind and I think about it intently for days.....running tens of thousands of possible variations before discussing it or writing about it.
I know that might be hard to understand (or believe) but ever since I was about 2 years old my mind has worked like that. I compare it to a Super Computer given a problem and asked to find a solution. That is exactly how my brain works. It first tries to understand the problem. Then seeks out potential solutions by running countless simulations. Once I find a solution to a problem I rerun the same simulation tens of thousands of times with only minor changes in the variables to see if the solution stands up and resolves the problem an acceptable amount of the time (at least 80%). Once I am satisfied the solution can resolve the problem I discuss it or write about it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit