RE: We need to extend the censorship free aspect of the blockchain...

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

We need to extend the censorship free aspect of the blockchain...

in steemit •  8 years ago 

Yes, I already indicated that in the post. Data and bandwidth needs would increase dramatically.

I did not claim to have the solution. I introduced it as something to think about solutions, and I've updated my post with SOME ideas related to that. Some of them such as working with torrents as well like bitchute could actually work now with some work and wouldn't require special blockchain needs, but due to how torrents work if there are no seeds then the content would cease to exist so that is still a problem.

I didn't claim to have the solution anywhere. I pointed out a problem. I am very aware of bandwidth and storage solutions, it is what I deal with regularly among other things at my job. I am a Network Engineer.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I was trying to point out that the storage requirements impart centralization and thus the potential for censorship on the content that already exists on the blockchain if we were to be naive and simply increase the block size.