The Steem blockchain and Steemit by extension is a wonderful experiment. That doesn't mean it is still not a large and growing collection of humans (and yes it's fair share of bots). As such it is going to have the same problems we all have with human nature. We all think differently, we all have our own beliefs. Generally this is not a bad thing, but there are times this does not work out well.
There are enough new people that I want to talk about some of what I perceive as blemishes on the steemit platform and how you as an individual might be able to approach them. I am basically sharing with you my plan of how I plan to approach them. I also will introduce new people to how to vote for witnesses, what witnesses do, etc.
The down vote (aka flag) can be a blemish on this platform. Many people see it as the opposite of the up vote. Technically in pure terms of code it is. Psychologically and what it does are not necessarily equal. It is currently a necessary TOOL due to the fact our platform is decentralized, and there is no police force that can monitor this place (this is a very good thing). That means policing this place is on us the community. The flag was initially intended for countering spam, abuse, and plagiarism. For these purposes it is indeed very much needed and I've seen the difference it can make on this place being pleasant. At some point they added disagreement over rewards. I personally believe this wording was a mistake. That totally opened the door for "A post about my neighborhood? I don't want anyone knowing about my neighborhood... it's not worth that $2 it is making... DOWNVOTE... great now it's worth $0 and POSSIBLY hidden". Yet that is not censorship. (yes, I am being sarcastic) It's still on the blockchain, yet it can make no money EVEN though there were people that WERE interested and wanted to support it. Depending upon the reputation system it may also be grayed out and hidden and thus receive much fewer views. Why? Some "Jerk" decided that their opinion of what people should be able to be interested in is all that matters. Yes, I used the term jerk because I am not pointing out specific people. This is a term I personally will not use directly to a person as I do try to keep it civil.
This is a problem with steem. It is one of the blemishes on an otherwise beautiful skin. So far it has only been accompanied by one additional blemish which @schattenjaeger wrote about yesterday and I did as well. Self voting your own comments and intentionally draining the reward pool for your own gain. I'm not going to do more than mention that one here. If you wish to know more then I recommend reading my post from yesterday where I also link to @schattenjaeger's.
My personal code of conduct
I am going to try to explain my personal approach to steemit. I am an individual and I respect all of you for being an individual so I do not expect you to do what I do. Unless you want to. I mainly am explaining it as it is relevant when I get to my discussion on witnesses (no, I am not running as a witness though I've been asked to).
- Revel in the freedom and uncensored nature of steemit. Respect the right or other people to be interested in things I am not. Do not interfere with their choices of topics, payment on those topics, etc.
- Be civil. I believe this is important. If someone starts calling me names, implying I am an idiot or otherwise ad hominem attacking me I try VERY HARD (yes, sometimes it is difficult) not to stoop to their level. If I fail and do that then ultimately they succeeded as they distracted from the topic, and they made me become someone I do not want to be.
- I will down vote only spam, abuse, and plagiarism. I will NOT be down voting on disagreement about rewards.
- If I see people exploiting the system or attacking and harming the steemit community in some way I will speak to them and TRY to persuade them as to why I think it is a bad idea. They very well may not agree. Sometimes surprisingly they do, and they say something along the lines of "I'd never thought about it that way".
- I will not speak of steemit as our private country club. As far as I'm concerned everyone is welcome, they just need to keep in mind that if they are hostile they likely won't fair well. If they only think of themselves and not the community they may not fair well. My goal is 100% user retention. Yes, this is unrealistic but still my goal. Jerks can hopefully change their ways. This is me perhaps being overly optimistic.
- I will do my best to try to keep an open mind, for even I could be the Jerk and not realize it. None of us are perfect, and we all make mistakes. In fact, most of us likely make more mistakes than we're willing to admit.
- I will do my best to keep steemit a growing, inclusive, and welcoming environment.
- From this point forward if people down vote based on anything other than plagiarism, spam, abuse, or combating exploitation then I will not follow them, and I will not vote for them as witness. I will not support actions that are based purely on opinion with no thought of the rights of other people to assemble, discuss the things they want, and be rewarded by those who have like minded interests.
- If a post has blatant imagery as the first image that is pornography, extreme violence (such as a murder scene), etc or is an otherwise ADULT or preferential type of post then one of it's tags should be NSFW. I will not censor such posts and they should be allowed here. Yet, they should not be shoved in people's faces that do not want to see them. We also do have some children and teens here. If it is tagged as NSFW you are free to post what you want (use your brain, this does not include things like pedophillia). such things if not tagged and forced upon people will be flagged, and not just by me. Your posts can still be quite lucrative with the NSFW tag. People still look at them and some people intentionally regularly check that tag.
Witnesses
Witnesses are important, but most people don't know about them. The steem blockchain is decentralized. It is spread out across computer nodes that are operated by witnesses. Anyone can become a witness provided they can create and operate a node that can keep the steem blockchain going.
You would think this centralizes power in the witnesses. It does not. They do not have special moderator abilities on steem. They are just users like you and I. They do however, provide a service. They also can work with other witnesses and steemit inc. to implement new code changes.
They are the closest thing to a senator, congressman, representative, etc that we have in the steem ecosystem.
However, unlike political representatives they have no term limits. You can vote them into a position of reward or remove them instantly depending upon votes. If you like how a person who is working on being a witness is behaving and you believe it is a benefit to steem as a whole then you should vote for them as a witness. Yes, I will explain how to do this. That is actually a big part of why I wrote this post.
The thing about witnesses is that the top 19 are the ACTIVE nodes. They actually receive a decent reward in steem every week for operating their node. This means witnesses really would like to be in the top 19 if they can be. Your vote matters.
There are many more witnesses than 19. The rest are backups so if one of those nodes goes down another will fill the spot.
You will see people campaigning for witness.
If you don't want to vote for witnesses but you do think it is important. There is a proxy feature. If there is someone in the community you trust and agree with their values and choices then you can designate them as a proxy. If you do this the people they vote for, or remove votes from will be mirrored by your own account. If you agree with my code of conduct above and do not want to vote for example then you could set me as your proxy. I think it is far better if you do the voting yourself, but if you're concerned you may forget, or you just don't want to then a proxy is an option. It does not have to be me. In fact unless you believe in my choices it shouldn't be me.
At this point here is how to vote for witnesses
First click on the menu to the right of your avatar
Second in the menu that pops up click on Vote for Witnesses
Vote for your witnesses and set proxies. There are several things here.
The top 50 will show in the list at the top, yet this is not all of them and new witnesses most likely will not be in this list.
(Please note if I am not voting for a witness here that is worthy, I likely don't know enough about them at the time, others I may not vote for because I've watched their actions in the past. Many of them though such as @good-karma I just don't know enough about)
Further down you have the ability to put a name in to vote for. I still have @dantheman in there and I will be removing him as I do not believe he is running a witness node any longer and he has ceased most of his activities here since moving onto EOS.
The last section is where you'd set a proxy if you simply want your votes to follow the votes of some other user.
Conclusion
If you ever see me supporting someone as a witness or as a follower and you can show me where they have been down voting purely based upon opinion and potentially damaging the community then point it out. I am not omniscient. I can't be everywhere and see everything. I will not be following or supporting such activities from this point forward.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b244/9b2441f495fc5ba466087ab094859b4163030fde" alt=""
The only thing I ever flag are people posting photos that aren't theirs and making it look like they took them. It's a dangerous game flagging people though as most will likely retaliate on one of your good posts. Luckily, most of them don't have the power to do much damage, but it's still the risk you run trying to keep Steemit clear of plagiarism.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep that is plagiarism and is a legit reason to flag something.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great post, I think people will fight the unfair system by waiting for that FLAG button to disappear or at least to have +5 or +10 flags to be considered a downvote.
If this is not changed... minnows will start to cross the ocean to LBRY or others in the future
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
SO people have been claiming for a year now, yes I've been battling about the flag almost that long... a couple of weeks and it will have been that long.
If the +5 and +10 flags are implemented then you'll see the reign of spam and the reign of bots. We've seen it before. It is actually why the reputation system was created.
So sometimes you can think the answer is easy... but usually the reason it has not been done is that it creates other exploits or problems. It's not an easy problem. :(
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Didn't even think about it. Chaos is then part of steemit with no solid solution
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Chaos is part of nature. We seek to impose order on it, and that is generally what we try to do. That doesn't mean it is always an easy process. It also doesn't mean we shouldn't try. It does mean when the problem is complex we can propose and idea, but then it is generally good to think "how can this change be exploited". Case in point... HF19 did some great things for voting... yet we suddenly have people exploiting it and voting up mass quantities of their own comments to ridiculous amounts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
why not captchas and +5 or +10? Bot killer?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steemit is just a website looking at the steem blockchain. That would not stop anything outside of steemit. People would just use the cli, write their own code, etc.
Steem is like a huge distributed file system. Steemit.com is but one television manufacturer that can tune into that file system and display it to you a certain way.
There are also steemdb, chainbb, busy.org, esteem, and zappl all looking at the same data. That number will grow.
So any solution needs to be done at the blockchain level if it is going to be a true code solution. Captchas won't work there as captchas are purely a web page bit of code and wouldn't actually have any effect in the blockchain itself.
Pretty much all the bots would be immune to it. They don't work through steemit or one of the websites they talk directly to the blockchain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good to see Reason still has a voice.
Good to see a Willingness to stand up for and defend Free Speech regardless of (political) views.
Good to see the Warning to all Pedo's and those defending it. ZERO tolerance.
Good to see more Voices in the community standing up against downvote bullying because of merely expressing views contrary to their own.
Good! Reason wins. Every time.
Witness voting is indeed important.
Many candidates I don't know. Some I do and 'vet' to the best of my abilities. And as we are on this platform longer, we will get to know some and hopefully interact.
Liked the post dwin! Happy Weekend!
😎
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Likewise... I'm off now to buy some fireworks for the grandkids and YES I'll be buying them with some of my magic internet money.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep - Tue is the Big Day! Enjoy the outing... :) Magic!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
$96 later they should be set.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Worth every dime, no? :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep definitely should be. I'll let you know afterwards... my house is going to smell like sulfur all day that day. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As long as it's not the 👿 or any of the clintons - you'll be fine.
Safety first.
:)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hehe... I'd welcome the Clintons... I'd be able to quickly solve some of the worlds problems. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
🤣 It would be a start...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm more concerned with idiots mass flagging people unwarranted and killing upvotes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It doesn't take mass idiots. A single powerful idiot can silence the voices of other up votes.
Yet currently you're not going to solve that with code. So I am giving people tools to do something about it. First don't call them an idiot when you are dealing with them directly. You won't convince them of anything except that perhaps they should be a bigger dick and flag more of your posts.
Attacking back verbally has no effect and tends to back fire and make things worse.
Being civil, sometimes works.
Remove your support, don't follow them, don't support them as a witness, mute them.
The little guys that go flag happy won't last here long. They are not much of a threat. So going flag happy will reduce their accounts potential. The problem is the powerful people that do this. It can be difficult to effect them in the same way.
Especially since due to their power people will follow them hoping for a nice paying vote from them even if the person is a dick.
This is something we shouldn't do.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great point, appreciate your advice and opinion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the article :) I unaware of these/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@dwinblood
I wasn't knew all these information.
Thank you for such a informative post.
Started following you
God bless you
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for this. I was only aware of the flag feature.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for the witnesses information. Been new on steemit, I remember that i vote 2-3 of the top ones in the witnesses list, without having very clear if that was best choice or not. About your other views on this post i will totally agree. Go this way and keep always an open mind buddy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think one (me) should first see what the witnesses have to say and show their actual service use and potential, and give "younger" witnesses a chance as well.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There are a few who would need to read this daily. Resteemed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi! I have a question - do we have any arbitrage system here on Steem?
Yesterday, some of my follower downvoted a lot of my posts. I don't know why, and honestly speaking, I try to avoid any contacts with sick people
I'm wondering, what if she would start to do that on a regular basis. What could I do with?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There is no centralized control. That would be a point the blockchain can be attacked. So the best thing you can do is be civil, don't resort to name calling, don't insult, etc. If you are being attacked and you try to be reasonable then there are generally people in the community that try to help.
@neoxian is one great person. He operates kind of a community legal service. He has also become LOL a Loan Shark in a completely voluntary basis which is also pretty awesome... and funny as can be.
He often will be an advocate to help a reformed plagiarist get accepted by the community. If something is very bad he or people like him might help.
It is my hope that other people will learn from his example and offer similar services.
The community is learning together. There will never be a central arbiter or it will make this experiment vulnerable. We hopefully will have community members and groups that rise to wield their power and influence in the community to accomplish similar type of activities.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good stuff and as usual I've learned somethin' new from you! Much appreciated. Keep the good stuff comin'. Knowledge is power.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great article (you might want to consider @jesta for witness. He's the one that designed Steemstats and a real asset to the community. I think I've only voted for about 5-6 witnesses and he's one.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah I can't recall him doing any questionable actions so he is likely a good choice. He DOES care.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Besides Steemstats, he's designed several features people use frequently. I can't even think of what they all are.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@jesta is creating what I think will be one of the largest used tools on the STEEM blockchain with ChainBB. I, for one, can't wait to use a private label version of it to get my audiences engaged in the Steem platform.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I didn't realize that was his project. Yeah definitely a reason there to vote for him.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Me too if somebody explains to me how! (I'm a technological neanderthal)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This comment has received a 0.13 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @brendanwenzel.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am familiar with him. He is worth a vote for sure. I also had some votes to spare. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, on behalf of my friend... Thanks! I don't really have many "friends" on here. You and stevescoins, ausbitbank, cryptofiend, jesta and the beneforti's... and my friends from Africa whose names I couldn't begin to spell or pronounce, oh and Ev Mickey. There's less than 20 actual friends!
I know I'm forgetting some!!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You likely have more than you realize. Some of us you just interact with on a much more regular basis. Pretty cool community we have here.
I mean I like Ev Mickey but he muted me because I didn't agree with him on some of his comments on one of my prison related posts. So like any family, we can also be disfunctional and have feuds. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I can see that happening... Ev has pretty strong views and he sticks by his guns (a little too much for me). To me it's fine to disagree... that's what leads to truths, maybe in a Hegelian manner. A little dispute is good for the soul!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That is my take as well. Anyway, that is why he and I do not interact anymore. His choice, and one he is free to make.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actually I didn't even disagree with Mickey... it just didn't actually have anything to do with what I wrote. It was a side track. It was related to the topic but nothing he said really had anything to do with what I wrote. :) What he said I didn't actually disagree with. I never could get him to realize that and he simply decided to mute me. Oh well.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Wow lots more that I did not know about! Thank You for doing this and yes resteemit!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Once again, Steemit has slapped me back into optimism.
It seems every time I become disenchanted with the Human race, someone (sometimes several people) post something like this that gives me hope again.
If I was to ever consider giving my witness votes in proxy, you would be at the top of the list.
Thank you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My pleasure. It is important to know what WE can do if we disagree with actions. Removing follows, and witness votes is not insignificant.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I've been wondering what the impact of a MUTE is?
i.e. does it effect rewards?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
All mute does is makes it to where YOU never see that persons posts or comments any longer. It actually doesn't do anything beyond that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's a shame, I could see it as a mid-level tool, something slightly less than a flag/downvote that gave the content author more control.
It'd be especially useful for the people who comment spam, upvoting their own comments to ridiculous payouts.
If muting them eliminated their rewards, eventually enough people's mutes would dry up their little scam.
Then again, some people would probably start muting every comment except the people on their buddies list and you'd basically have the minnow's version of a circle-jerk.
Argh, why are there no simple answers?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well I view this as us all landing on an unexplored digital continent. We don't know what is going to happen, and we have a lot to learn, and many things we need to solve haven't actually been encountered by anyone before.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
But that's life, just when you think you've got everything nailed down, you round the corner and find a whole new set of "challenges".
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yep.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
why ain't you running for witness? :(
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't have time to run a node. Perhaps I would in the future.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I would appreciate that. You would be my second witness vote ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I appreciate the support. We do have a lot of decent people running for witness. I have removed support from people before when I didn't think they had steemit's best interest at heart and seemed more focused on themselves and treating it like their private kingdom.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I only know one witness, but I will look through them at some point even though I am not that big a fan of representive voting systems...
Btw do witness votes have the same weight as my normal votes? (a vote of somebody with 10x Steempower has 10x the weight?)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The present problem is - miners wont power down and cash holders wont power up. I brought cash onto the system early on with the old power down schedule. It made sense for me at the time. Then there were about 5 hard forks or maybe 10 - I cant keep track. The "investment" as it stand right now is not much of one. How many people would lock up an altcoin for 3 months so they can "share the wealth". There is very little incentive for someone to take 500k USD just to power up to a level where they can make someones post move up a few notches.. Eventually 500 users will bring 1k each and it will have a similar effect - but until larger accounts power down (and stop delegating SP) - I'm personally sheepish purchasing SP - what do you think the value proposition would be at this point in time to "power up"? Is there anything beyond one becoming a witness or voting for a selection of witnesses to enact change? Interesting discussion to have - I have noticed a very large influx of users who actually want to interact (which is great) - hopefully the tools exist to keep them here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well by miners I assume you mean the original miners?
As there is NO mining on the steem blockchain anymore. All of us technically are mining it just by using it.
Yet yes there are a number of very powerful accounts that are that powerful simply due to being in the right place at the right time.
This is fine, as long as we as a community can keep them from making this place inhospitable.
I will say due to the fact that power lets you then interact with the ecosystem that you can actually make a ton of money.
There is little incentive for people to purchase this and treat it like another altcoin and just sit on it. Other than this may be one of the only alt coins actually backed by something. Our ideas, our works, etc are all inextricably tied into this.
So if you approach it purely from a BUY and WAIT investor perspective then it may not have the movement you want.
However, if you buy and engage it likely will make you far more money than any other coin. Your power also represents your power to earn as well as share by participating.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes - I know there is no mining.. there hasnt been mining that anyone other than one asshole (or was it two) could participate in for a long time.
In regard to the investment - most people make 2-10% on their money depending on their risk tolerance in tradition investing.. Im saying the incentive to invest is significantly less than it used to be and as you pointed out - you can be downvoted to 0. So you have currency risk mixed with insurrection risk. I love Steemit - ive been on it a long time. I think Steem is a great currency - I think the 3 day savings account is an often under looked feature.. Its not the only coin backed by something - check out storj (a company with a business plan). Im not a Steem hater but the subject was flags and downvotes and as an investor I dont see the value in having to outbuy everyone else. I could simply go to any ad exchange and pay for eyeballs the way everyone else does. I say remove the self vote from the platform and you end up with a bunch of sock accounts - try and control that and something else emerges. How many hardforks will it take until people realize the circle is getting bigger. No matter how many ways you slice it - some people got WAY too much of the pie - I'd love to see Steemit succeed but how do you undo the wealth distribution without completely deviating from the original vision - can Steemit grow and retain users with the current balance of power?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sure... yet the problem is not an easy one. Thus, why it hasn't been solved yet. Every solution I've seen opens the door for other exploits.
Thus, why I see the community as a whole being likely the best place to find solutions. Oh and, yep I knew you've been around for a long time. :)
I think it can. I also think in many ways I've seen improvements. I've seen bad actors change their minds. Some have not, but others have.
It certainly is a challenge. Yet I actually think it has the potential to be huge.
I am familiar with storj. That isn't exactly what I meant.
Some people value their creations more than the money, and years down the road it is going to be those creations they think of. This has a lot of potential value and it is neatly tied together with steem. It's pretty brilliant and I just believe we are seeing the beginning of the sparks of what this thing can be... whether it explodes into a fire of innovation and world change... that still remains to be seen.
Right now if someone dropped $1 million on this for steem power... they'd have so much steem power that depending on their actions as things have been going I bet they could more than double that in a year. That's a pretty good ROI. That does assume they interact and engage.
At the same time that steem power is still worth whatever steem changes in value, so if their actions are beneficial to steem even that would increase as well.
So I don't really see it nearly as risky an investment as the majority of cryptos. Actually, I personally consider it the best crypto on the market. They just INTENTIONALLY have not decided to market it YET. They plan to, but they've been trying to finish a few things before they do.
So this is steem and steemit with no official marketing. Official marketing WILL come.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Special theme Thank you I wish you a beautiful day
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Honestly to me the "flag" is my only problem with Steemit. I do not think it should be able to take away ALL of someone's earnings without an equal or greater amount of flags to upvotes. Otherwise a person with a million SP can come by and censor me or anyone else without cause or reason. But this is the system that is in place. So I will not complain to loudly haha. Have a good day sir. You and your family are killing it here on Steemit. Keep it up.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We are happy. We are not any of the people constantly in the trending section, though I don't worry about that. I did make it 3rd in trending once and didn't know until someone told me. Unfortunately from the reward perspective that was when the reward pool was switched to the 7 day method and they required it to determine an 30 day average before it worked... so for a good part of 30 days the payouts were really low. Which happens to be when I was 3rd on trending. :P I think I made $20.
I'm trying to get all of my family involved on here, because I love steemit. Two of them have been here almost as long as me. Two others and my son in law all joined within the last month. My youngest son said he finally created an account, but it is still waiting approval. My oldest daughter I don't know if this will be her type of thing or not.
I've felt that way for almost a year now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Excellent post thank you. I especially like the idea of your first commenter who suggested 'x' flags required to action, rather than just one. That would solve your issue. X
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actually it won't. Very easy to circumvent and it also opens the doors for bots and spam. I explained in my comments to him. There are no EASY solutions to most of these problems. We haven't been simply ignoring them for a year, we've been talking about them quite a bit and trying things. Yet these are not as easy to solve as people thing. Most "solutions" simply open the doors to other problems.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The 'naivety' of the innocent'! X
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It does seem that Steemit has a lot of the features that would be good for society. Love the easy ability to remove witnesses as opposed to set political terms measured in years in the real world!
What if downvote flags cost twice what upvotes did? Two downvote flags to balance out one upvote? At least make people think twice before they waste voting power on a down vote?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hehe... like I said not easy... one word BOTS and SPAM. Doing that gives bots and spam an advantage. They become more difficult to combat. You don't want that... I've seen it first hand I believe back in august some time. Before they implemented the reputation system 9 out of 10 posts were spam for a week or so. the Cheetah bot tried to keep up with fighting them (great service, great bot) but the bots all teamed up that were doing the spam and just up voted each other and their own posts and Cheetah could not fight them.
The reputation system was implemented to fight this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So how does the reputation system stop this?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Reputation really only works here on steemit, and any other site that chooses to implement it. Essentially if someone of higher reputation than you down votes you your reputation is decreased. If someone higher reputation up votes you your reputation is increased.
Now when we apply a down vote/flag it takes reputation into consideration. So when there dozens of spam bots all up voting each other and colluding and the people trying to fight them could not keep up the reputation solved this. The down vote from higher reputation account could hide the spam and all of those bots colluding could not defeat it. It was pretty ugly for about a week before this. I am serious when I say 9 out of 10 posts seemed to be spam that week.
Though as with MOST solutions they also introduce new problems. What about this reputation system when it is used against people to silence them or hide their posts? This is still an issue today and one I despise.
There is no simple PROGRAMMATIC solution to this and every problem doesn't need to be solved in code. We as a community can also do something about it. For one thing we can stop following such people, stop voting on them for witnesses, etc REGARDLESS of how powerful they are and how attractive an well paying vote might be to you from them.
Yes some powerful people often get support because a vote from them is worth a lot, even when their actions likely need to lose them followers and such.
I try to change minds, rather than push new code based rules upon people.
I haven't actually seen any suggestions that I cannot quickly think of a work around, new problems, exploits for.
There are some ideas people have suggested before and I've always said I'm willing to experiment and try new things. We just need to be willing to take a step back if the experiment fails.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Doesn't sound like there is any easy solution short of dialogue and community cooperation.
Kind of like life ;-)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That is my current conclusion as well. Though I am still thinking and waiting for some epiphany. It hasn't happened yet, good thing I haven't been holding my breath.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit