Here in the Earth Nation, we really love the concept of Steem.
We perceive that Steem has a weakness that may dramatically effect the value of Steem on the open market and make Steem very difficult to sell.
Here’s an example;
A hedge-fund with access to billions of dollars purchases all of the Steem available on the open markets. That Hedge-Fund then places buy orders for Steem at a higher rate, temporarily artificially increasing the price of Steem to 7 dollars per. They then power up a network of like-bots to automatically engage with AI spun content to turn Steem into an automated ROI farm. They start dumping massive amounts of Steem on the market without increasing the demand for Steem or adding any value to the user/content base. Thus devaluing all of Steem.
For this example let’s assume the Hedge-Fund originally buys 100M Steem with 84M USD worth of Cryptocurrency. They then place another 50M into Buy Order for more Steem. When the Price of Steem goes from 0.84 to 7 dollars per Steem because of this move, that 100M worth of Steem is now worth 700M. The Hedge Fund then uses this 700M worth of Steem to POWER UP.
This Hedge Fund intelligently diversifies this Steem into thousands of different accounts to attempt to hide this move to monopolize Steem. The Fund then automates all of these profiles with AI automation and sets up a network of cross-liking and comment upvoting that hides itself from the rest of the Steem community by never upvoting posts enough to hit trending, while also never using any normal tags.
The Hedge-Fund then uses its 700M power to upvote exclusively their own posts and comment content. They start making 70,000 dollars worth of Steem every single day by doing this. 2.1M a month. 25.55M dollars a year.
Based on this example, it would only take a 150 million dollar initial investment to start producing almost 25 million dollars a year. What’s more, 50 million dollars of that initial investment would come back within a month after the hedge-fund drops the buy orders after powering up. That’s a 25% yearly interest bank-account.
We know of Hedge-Funds that are just waiting for the Steem User Base to grow larger so they can safely pull this move off and milk the Steem economy for as much as they can before the increased supply without an increase in demand crashes the price of Steem beneath 1 cent per making it almost impossible to sell.
Because of this Vulnerability we cannot yet bring Steemit to our Greater Network.
Our Solution to this problem is a new variable attached to all Steem accounts. For the purpose of this Example, Let’s call this Variable “Influence”. Every account starts with 100 Influence.
Accounts that consistently either like their own content, and/or continuously like the content of the same accounts, and/or continuously like the content of accounts that have been associated as “bots” will lose influence every week. Accounts that consistently like content from users they haven't liked before gain influence.
Accounts that have an influence score less than 100 have a penalty to their upvote power. At 0 influence a 70% penalty is applied.
Accounts that have an influence score more than 100 have an increase to their upvote power. At the 200 influence cap a 30% boost is applied.
To keep a 200 influence, accounts must engage with totally new users 10% of the time, and engage with users that they have not frequently engaged with 25% of the time.
For users that do not want to spend a lot of time finding new authors, we strongly recommend giving some of your weekly votes towards a curation service that will automatically use your votes to find new users with the best content.
This solution will not only dramatically reduce the ROI from Hedge-Funds seeking to monopolize steem to the point where it will collapse our economic system from flooding the market with steem without increasing the demand for steem…. This solution will also facilitate more support for new authors who are trying to be seen. Which is the other greatest problem Steem faces; It is very difficult to get started here making a noticeable income.
We realize that steemit-upvote bots pose a similar issue. Wherein an hedge fund can inflate the price of steem, use that to get a lot of power up, then delegate their vote to mercenary bots to get the same 25% yearly Interest. However…. This potential problem is much easier to solve, as it is very easy to track these mercenary bots and who is funding them. It is a simple thing to setup a bot swarm to automatically give a 30-50% penalty to these mercenary bots, which will dramatically reduce the ROI for investors to prevent pumping and dumping of Steem on the market.
Our Economic Team also strongly recommends that the Founders of Steem reserve at least 50M steem for the purpose of filling buy orders/placing sell orders at ranges between 2-10 dollars to prevent artificial inflation and manipulation of Steem Value.
We have 2 potential avenues to integrate these solutions into Steem.
Fork/Adjust the Steem Code.
Create a Data Service that automatically compiles all users influence and makes all Steem users influence rating and upvoting habits known to all other Steem users. Then create a swarm of bots that automatically penalize those with low influence while boosting those with high influence.
The Purpose of this Article is to determine whether Steemians support this Solution. If we find the Steem community to be in support we will create this data service and bot swarm software free of charge and Open-source. Alternatively we are open to helping fork the code to include this upgrade.
If you think we are somehow incorrect about our perspective or calculations, let us know. Please list sources from official steem sites to back up your perspective. If you have a better solution to this problem, please share it!
If you agree with our solutions, please show us your support!
I think your argument is flawed from the start. If any hedge-fund decides to go in, you would see many more follow the suit. So a single entity wouldn't be able to do the damage, because now they have to compete against other hedge-funds and financial entities.
Besides the fact that, it would be much more beneficial for any financial entity to implement win-win strategy, and find out being in on Steem would give them financial advantage over others.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not only that, but as you buy up the STEEM order books around the internet, the price will rise very, very quickly and you reach diminishing returns, like any other thing traded on open markets. This whole post is fantasy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks @geekgirl for bringing this up. Not only is your argument flawed, @earthnation, but you're also completely skewed morally.
As @inquiringtimes and many others brought up, you summoned every upvote bot there is and used them to push your undeserving content to the top of Trending. And then, you flagged the comments these bots sent to your post.
After paying for the upvotes, why would you ever flag their comments? This is one of many reasons I'm hoping bot owners will take the time to add a blacklist of people who do abusive things like this.
Please stop abusing the rewards pool and promoting scammy content that frankly, will never work.
Thank you,
a concerned Steemian.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@geekgirl @sneak its apparent you missed the entire point of this dialogue. It's not an arguement, its a conversation. A thread to discuss various possibilities and to reach a higher point of community clarity on how steem and all associated mechanisms REALLY works. Since well sourced information on it seems difficult to find.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The problem here is that you essentially imply that STEEM is doomed b/c this can happen; however, this same scheme could be done in so many other markets. What I've seen is that if they were to buy up all the STEEM (or fill-in-the-blank) then there would be none available for anyone else to buy and/or it would be too expensive to sell. Besides, the fact is that probably 75% of STEEM owners won't specifically sell their STEEM (I know it's a grand exaggeration, but if anyone caught wind of such a buy-up then more would HOLD). That's my 2-cents-worth at least.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
They'd sell like a mofo if price went to $7, I'd wager.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And whoever bought at that price would lose when the markets correct.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think that’s accurate.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's the nature of markets, yes. People buy, people sell.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It also helps when you have great visibility in the community.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
so... you came up about $1000 in 22 days by paying for votes... did you really think that's the way this is supposed to work? and now you power down? because we called you out on your behavior? but, you really love steem?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I could only wish to know the right people that would pull me up to $1000. If all that is accurate then it I’m disappointed 😔.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's hilarious that you're talking about "upvote bots" yet using them as often as possible to upvote your own posts.
I suggest you reconsider this hypocrisy. FYI - on Friday I'll have enough SP back to counter all of your purchased hypocritical votes.
It's also hella rude for you to flag those bots comments just to try to hide them from your post considering they're the ones providing all of your rewards.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Out of all the accounts, I hope that you take this one out first. People may not like you, but you are my hero for calling them out on their shit. Everyone else just sees dollar signs and stays quiet. I don't like scammers, and spammers, and I appreciate what you do.
You are a witness to believe in @nextgencrypto
With love,
shello
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"Out of all the accounts, I hope that you take this one out first."
The ability of a whale (or anybody bigger than you) to 'take out an account' is why A. serious authors won't invest their time/effort into steem and B. Steem will never hit mass adoption.
Applauding that behavior is not, in my opinion, in any way supporting Steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Serious authors offering genuine content have nothing to fear. Offering bogus "fixes" to "problems" with totally contrived nonsense, however....
I like to think of the user base on this platform to be its own immune system. The people in this post who are heavily opposed to this idea are people who know what they're doing, and most have done it for years now. Their methods may be....interesting....but the point is they react based on the knowledge they have, not because they don't like outsiders or whatever bullshit. Whether or not it looks like it, they've got the platform's best interests in mind here. Ultimately, if someone doesn't want their account "taken out", then it's best not to do something detrimental or scammy to the system. That's pretty much the gist of it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"Serious authors offering genuine content have nothing to fear."
That's absurd (or at best, false).
Anybody with more clout than their target can end an account.
See @kerriknox's account. Rep from 60+ to -1, earnings per post from $100+ to $0 because she can't post anything because that the downvoter with 300kish steem downvotes it.
It's great to knock down plagerizers etc. Good.
But am I going to rent delegated SP to increase my visibility etc to speed up my account growth/not waste content with no viewers etc just to have berniesanders or equivalent downvote me because he sees I rented delegated SP or did some selfvoting and downvotes all my ' purchased hypocritical votes'? (or some other guy with some other 'self votes' are bad justification)?
Nope. So I, having been here for a couple months wanting to really like steemit, being a content creator in my own business, am going to keep my content building there and am not going to risk wasting time/effort here.
'I' am irrelevant. I say the above because, again, serious content producers aren't going to stick to a platfrom that is so risky, and mass adoption certainly isn't going to happen while it's so risky.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Then I must be in some way privileged, because I don't find it absurd at all. During the time I've been here - since July of last year - I've been flagged only 4 or 5 times at most, and those were usually either bot downvotes for whatever mathematically random reason that didn't amount to any damage, or because someone just disagreed with some trivial thing that was said, kind of as if one of us were to flag the other of us just because we disagreed. It's lame, but it's allowed. I've just avoided the drama and done pretty well, I suppose. I'm not rich by any stretch of the imagination, but I'm not unhappy with what this place has done for me since I've been here. So perhaps it just depends on the perspective we each have and what value we assign to this place on a personal level. I've got art and photography and music for days, so I just keep posting.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So from your perspective, an author with a rep of 60+ and $100+/post having their account destroyed by a single individual is what exactly?
Do you think that steemit is going to thrive when anybody's hard work can be wiped out with no protections or recourse?
Also, you did notice that your 'has nothing to worry about' claim has been proven false, yes?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
One has to wonder: what about the post is drawing flags? I have yet to really see someone get flagged for no real reason, as if done by some of the low-rep bots I've seen that do it randomly.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ultimately, everyone is free to vote however they like. And this has proven to be quite the divisive truth, seeing as how the power of the vote is dependent on the user's level of wealth - literally. Being on the bottom end of that deal is not necessarily the best in the world, and I get that. I'm down here too. My vote means virtually nothing - maybe 6 cents right now. But if you're telling me that anyone can randomly be downvoted by a large whale for absolutely no reason and be obliterated when it happens, I'd have to say I don't agree with that because I and many others who post non-divisive posts don't generally experience that. When you post an opinion, you're going to get people who disagree. That's just a fact of having opinions. It's guaranteed some people will disagree. And with a system where everyone has an up and a downvote option to use however they please, guess what? They're going to use it however they please. And those opinions expressed as votes will also have those who agree and disagree. For these reasons - and for reasons of blood pressure and stress - I avoid topics like religion, politics, controversies and conspiracies, who the whales are upvoting/downvoting, etc etc etc. Outside of Steemit, those things have no bearing on my personal life, so why would I add that stress? It's not worth it. I have problems of my own. Steemit is totally an auxiliary experience for me.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you, Bernie!
Such a nonsense wouldn't have ever made it to the trending page without buying the position.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I just wrote an algorithm that naked short sells BTC. I'm going to sell the algorithm to the Citadel tomorrow, so you'd better get out today. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
i see what your concerns were with a post like this but you could end the bots and still have same problem with the amount of whales that sell their votes and when smts come everyone will be able to sell there voting in some way
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is not about bots, it's about abuse and scam. You may also consider the comments from a bunch of established users here that got much more into detail than I did.
Amount of whales.. Where do you get these numbers from?
I'm pretty sure SMTs are not invented to encourage vote trading but to strenghthen the overall value of Steem. That's at least what I got from the whitepaper and videos so far.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
by the amount of whales is from observations if you check transfers to a few whales that vote a lot you'll see many links with "gifts"
but does it really matter if users buy votes by steem sbd or trading votes is happening everywhere
check trending of #meme #fun #story for easy to see examples of this
didn't say was purpose SMTs were invented for but will allow anyone to sell votes without being seen in transfers
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Some people fight for noble causes, to bring the Earth and its people to a better place. I see you have other priorities.
I find it genuinely interesting that you find it rude to downvote bots. I'm serious about being genuine: understanding people's value systems is something I really like delving into. What is the source of this perceived rudeness? Basically, I'm asking you directly: why are you spending your most precious resource, time, doing something that counter-acts collective goodness? That doesn't seem like something a rational person does. What do you gain/what do you think you're accomplishing? Why does berniesanders wake up in the morning/what purpose do you want your hands to work towards?
We have actually fostered a relationship with several of the bot owners, so it's not like we're taking what we can get and snubbing the owners. Likewise, we are using this to step into the forefront of Steemit to both grow the entire platform and spread the wealth with our Steemit guild; a process which we have been open and transparent about - even communicating with the developers of the site about the state, growth, and foreseeable problems of the site. From a position of knowledge, I find it very difficult for you to posit a counter argument that does not simultaneously align with the stagnation of the systemic growth of Steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am glad you are going to take action against this page. They even had the cheek to reach out to my project @paywithsteem asking for a partnership and asked me to send them SBD for it!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's okay @berniesanders, they just want to tell you who,what,when, and why to vote for someone. After all you are not Smart enough to do it yourself.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@berniesanders We'd like to reflect back to you the hateful nature of your perspective. Were doing the best we can to share positivity and fantastic ideas/articles and thoughts with our shared community.
Why do you spend so much of your time and energy attacking us?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
the reason you are being chosen, is because you use a tag that has nothing to do with your post, and you are a known spammer \ tag spammer \ plaigerist \ upvotebot abuser. that simple
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@inquiringtimes we changed the steemfest tag upon your request. Everything we have ever posted is content owned by the EN. What other methods are we using that you consider to be "spam"?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
wait for it
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There are many different people using upvote bots. What in particular is bothering you so much about our usage of up-vote bots?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@berniesanders we found that having all of the bot comments makes it difficult for this article to be used as a conversation thread. We don't see why its rude to hide those comments, will you please elaborate on why you feel it is wrong for us to clear the comment space for other peoples solutions to be more easily seen?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
why the heck would you use a dozen upvote bots in the first place? and then flag them? If i sold you a service, and then you flagged me, I wouldn't want you as my customer.... it's just ignorant.
also, ignorant is hitting your post with every upvote service in the steemiverse.
upvote bots are supposed to help you get a bit of visibility, so other people will read your post and decide to vote it or not. you are using them like a junkie... it's quite a bit more socially acceptable to use them sparingly, and make better content if you don't get enough natural votes.
also, you can just upvote the comments you like and then the real comments rise. I prefer a requested bot comment to some of the bs fake comments, tbh. flagging the vote bots that you paid for? smh.....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Maybe the author wanted to hide the fact that he paid for every vote buying service that exists on this platform to bring this piece of content into a trending position. Also the author used (pardon abused) the tag #steemfest and put the word 'minnow support' in the headline to improve visibility. This author pratices everythig but no minnow support.
The tag abuse might be even an interesting issue for @steemcleaners.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actually, we decided to do it because we noticed there was an inverse relationship between bot comments and human commenters. We wanted more human commenters to participate in order to give people a voice on the topics we are bringing to Steemit.
This is untrue. Our Steemit guild is designed to support as many people who participate in it. We share our upvotes in strategic sessions, boosting people's content frequently. We're helping a lot of smaller accounts rise up and gain followers quickly.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
A simpler way would have been to offer upvotes to human replies and actually help people. Instead, it was chosen to slap the bots.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I didn't request to remove the tag, you were abusing it to get more visibility.
Funny enough that you promote "authenticity" in your super academy, while you are practicing the complete opposite by yourself:
Check out my account @steemaniacs and you will notice: everything that you are pretending to do was already invented and honestly (!) practiced long time before you started.
Actions speak louder than words and this community has an eye on your doings now. Good luck!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
this is also spam, and a dangerous thread to be commenting irrelevant material.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well said mate.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
the real reason people comment less when there are a lot of bot comments, is because if you have to pay so many bots for your content to be popular, then your content must not be very good. so people see all the bots and think, why does the author think it's so valueless they must pay 10 bots to vote for it, hmm it must not be good content, I won't engage.
pass that on to your media consultants, free of charge.
flagging your paid advertisers is like giving a spanking to people who helped you. I know quite a few bot developers, and I will make sure they know this happens, so they can stop servicing people who "reward" their service with a downvote.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We put the smallest amount of down-vote in to the comments of those bots @inquiringtimes to clear the space for more room for dialogue.
We recommend that upvote bots set an option to not have them auto-comment or a smaller comment box so it doesn't take up so much space.
If our 1 cent flags are somehow harming the bots themselves, we'd be happy to upvote comments to offset the loss.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You can say it's bad logic, but I know these things from a few months of digging deep. This whole site is a deep well of knowledge, first thing first, etiquette. Flags are not to be used in an idle fashion. They are akin to throwing a glove on the ground or taking your glasses off and handing to a friend. It's asking for a fight. If you had been paying attention, there is quite a bit of controversy over the use of bots and providing the service. It's best left for minnows and people who don't have visibility. Now you've opened up Pandora's box. The best way to proceed is to speak softly, and pay more attention to how the rest of the community behaves. Just like in any community. You have a chance to redeem yourself, it's just going to be harder. All eyes are on you now. Cite your images. Reference quotes, stay clear of any hint of plagairism
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are really nailing this dialog man, it's a joy to behold :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
good luck with that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@earthnation, I believed censorship is a bad thing and that Steem should be an okay place for everyone to get together and collaborate as a community.
You're ridiculing this principle just by being here on Steemit. For the good of the rewards pool and for the good of our community, please stop milking upvote bots and promoting spammy content.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If this guy is honest about helping minnows, then self voting would be beneficial since his steem power will get a boost.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
you seem to be confused about how it all works
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
lol Feel the Bern?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I didn't expect that you will come back here with power. If this is true, then that would be great :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What do you feel when you "handle" these posts?
Why do you feel that way?
Are you "handling" posts for a perceived good, or to unconsciously boost your ego?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Many of us feel relief that someone with a large stake had the balls to do something. He's one of the few, if not only many times.
I perceive what bernie does as being good for the entire platform; and often times I believe they wait to do anything until many of us have complained publicly in chat.
The perception of this project in chat is far different than the hollow praise seen in the comments section here on Steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is not about feelings here, we're talking about business.
Even a decentralized system has certain rules. Since you set up an academy where you teach newbies how steemit works, you should know better...
Lesson 1: Don't excessively use vote byuing.
Lesson 2: Don't practice tag abuse.
Lesson 3: Don't talk about things you have no idea about.
You had 3 in 1. Congratulations!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is not about me, it's about your piece of content. You can ask me 1,000 things about my state of mind, the answer is: none of your business.
While you believe that I waste my time commenting here, you should appreciate the given advices. There are a couple of established users (even the CTO from Steemit Inc!) trying to open your eyes since a couple of hours, and the only thing you do is telling us that you feel offended.
@ats-david just said it all with his comment.
I'm out.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
:)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Just wanted to let you know I can't wait until you start the destruction. Happy to see that somebody is stepping up to take care of business. Good luck come friday 🤘
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Get 'em! I don't have much else to contribute, since it's already been said, but this needs to be nuked into oblivion. They need to be nuked into oblivion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not to split hairs....but the longest post just this month alone was @StellaBella at 45+K words, which dwalf the size of this post by more than double the size :)
Steemit: Where Attention Seeking 1st World Post and Angsty Replies Make Opening Steem Links Difficult for 3rd World Country Steemians
souce: pinterest
@StellaBella's Post a Sight to Behold for Stirring the
Hornet's/ Steemian's nest: https://steemit.com/deathspiral/@stellabelle/is-steemit-in-an-economic-and-social-suicide-death-spiralDownvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Just stop that. Our community is growing at a healthy pace. We don't need the help of phonies like you and no we are not going to tell you how to maximize your vote buying abuse without getting flags.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's not really growing at a healthy pace but a snail pace. We don't even have a million users after the first year!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Why do you seem so hurt by us @acidyo? Were on your side too. We don't mean to "abuse vote buying".
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yet you keep doing it after being told that's what it is.
At that point, it's no longer innocent.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you, Winston!
It turns out to become ridiculous. The only statement missing here is "Oh we didn't know that excessive vote buying could harm the eco-system".
Oh man.....!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Why are you so triggered about us and this post @surfermarly?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's not this post specifically, I generally care for the future of this platform.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We have been convinced! We will not be using up-vote bots in the same way in the future. Thank you for understanding that we did not understand @winstonwolfe
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
In other words, drink, be merry, and nevermind the man behind the curtain? Just be blissfully ignorant while you scam on?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Will you elaborate on what you think were scamming on about?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh yunno, that thing you're doing that you're labeling as "not a scam" even though you're being told very plainly and clearly it's what you're doing by multiple big-hitters on the site (many of whom don't get along, btw - that should say something).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Again, what is the "thing were doing"?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well it's obviously not listening.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We are trying @winstonwolfe! We are here for you and doing the best we can to play nicely and inspire dialogue while adding value to the community.
Please, give us a break.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We would love to show you what we do and what were really on about over a phone or video call @berniesanders.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The Earth Nation Steemit Guild is a designed to support content creators in earning a basic living income through Steem. We have several layers with which we do this.
Education. https://awakening-sovereignty-collective.teachable.com/p/steemit-academy
This steemit academy is a free general overview. We have an advanced academy and we are developing an Academy for writers/content creation/content curation/content formatting/audience and keyword targeting.
Community Support. We hold globally attendable zoom meetings several times a week to educate and support our guild members with live training, Q&A and general love and support.
Cross-Liking. Our guild members give 7 votes a day towards upvoting each other. We have a custom software system to make this process automatic. 2 times a day everyone upvotes the main EN Whale. The other 5 votes are spent on 5 guild members who's time it is to get boosted. Members get upvoted every 1-2 weeks currently. When a member gets upvoted, every member of our guild upvotes them with full power.
Cross-Resteeming. Each guild member resteems Guild Content 3 times a week. The first resteem is an EN Whale posting. The 2nd and 3rd resteems are of other guild members. Anytime a post is resteemed it is also upvoted by everyone.
Curation. Before any content is upvoted or resteemed, it is curated, proof-read and edited by our writers team to ensure the highest quality content with positive perspectives.
Post Syndication. We currently use zapier, streemian, buffer, and wordpress pluggins to automatically syndicate with post formating our guild members posts to social media sites and wordpress blogs agross the internet. Within weeks we will have a custom application that makes this process a simple 3 step task with unlimited sharing and smart post content formating. This software will be part of the guild automation suite.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am not very happy to know about the abusive behaviors of @earthnation toward using bots and the reward pool.
However, I do see value in the idea of implementing the influence measure to steemit accounts.
I believe that the advantages from such implementation are worth considering because (in my opinion)
* They will prevent circle and feedback-loop upvotes between whales and Co.
* They will prevent automated votes on the same accounts just for the sake of higher curation rewards, without bothering to read the contents.
* They will prevent @earthnation and others from abusing bot votes to the extreme (if at all)
Now whether @earthnation does this programing/implementation to steemit blockchain or not, is another issue to be discussed. I am sure steemit has lots of good programmer who are able to make such changes without depending on @earthnation. since people don't seem to trust them very much.
@earthnation,
You have started the very wrong way. People are getting fed up with abuse of reward pools and are very ready to attack anyone that does it openly to get attention.
Maybe you were doing this without malicious intent, it will be hard now to get back the respect and trust of steemit. Yet, hard doesnt mean impossible to correct with hard work and sincerity. So, don't make it impossible by continuing on the same path you started with.
Best,
Dr. TLK
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You have collected your daily Power Up! This post received an upvote worth of 0.15$.
Learn how to Power Up Smart here!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What details would you like @berniesanders? We will happily answer any questions you have. I posted a short summary as to our guild services below.
As you read this, were working on developing more services for steem. We were considering making this defender bot swarm next... However that doesn't seem like a very popular idea right now :p.
Instead, were going to keep focusing on our post distribution system to empower steemians to share their posts easily to other forms of social media.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 61.17 % upvote from @boomerang thanks to: @earthnation
@boomerang distributes 100% of the SBD and up to 80% of the Curation Rewards to STEEM POWER Delegators. If you want to bid for votes or want to delegate SP please read the @boomerang whitepaper.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 37.19 % upvote from @boomerang thanks to: @boomerang-fund
@boomerang distributes 100% of the SBD and up to 80% of the Curation Rewards to STEEM POWER Delegators. If you want to bid for votes or want to delegate SP please read the @boomerang whitepaper.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
nice post, follow me
@osman28
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The value of Bitcoin Cash is easy to see. But you need to look at its value from a FIAT currency perspective and not from a crypto currency perspective if you are going to see that value.
The word "cash" provides the biggest clue. It was no doubt chosen for the new currency because it invokes a sense of tangibility ( and normalcy ) in the minds of people. The target market for Bitcoin Cash is ordinary consumers...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If a dollar had twice the buying power tomorrow, you'd only need one instead of two. Apply that concept to steem.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting for significant disagreement with rewards. Nonsensical FUD does not warrant the pending reward.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Awesome! I was waiting for someone with power to stand up here and stop it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very interesting article! I had a similar idea to make self and circle voting less attractive by implementing diminishing returns, but your post opens a completely new perspective on the possible scenario of hedge-fund attacks.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Super smart solution @jaki01
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My thoughts, having read and examined your post closely
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Haha, you summed it up perfectly! :-)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Where are these 20+ million followers? If you really had that much followers your website would be used even a little bit, not look like this:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
They seem to be about as "popular" as @matttrainer.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Haha, nice comparison :-)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The followers in our extended media alliance are part of the Concious Media Alliance. https://www.consciousmediacoalition.com/ Most notable is collective evolution with more then 5 million followers. https://www.facebook.com/collectiveevolutionpage
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have an easy fix to your doomsday scenario, first, stop powering down or hedge fund will get them. Then buy some liquid Steem, there are many of us doing so and I'm sure many are planning to hold them for a long time. Second, tell your 5 million followers to get some too. If each of them would buy only 2, it would instantly be 10 million Steem off the market and out of reach for any single hedge fund.
That's a fix to your problem you should be advocating and actually is doable. So let's try that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Buy STEEM? Why would they do that? And how? They likely don’t have much money.
EDIT:
Looks like I was right.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What a marvelous excitement - people start to think ahead!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What happens, if someone hacks into the Data Service ? And what is the definition of engagement ? How would you define that ?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Wow! What an intelligent thought on how this solution could fail. Thank you @sanmi.
Well! Ultimately, our data service would be its own blockchain. However.... our developers work first by making web-based applications.
If our web based app was hacked, we would almost certainly notice it..... and then we would recall all of the votes made by our botswarm so long as we caught the hack within 7 days.
The definition of engagement for the purpose of this example is purely "upvoting".
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Then why do you not go and BUILD your own blockchain? If your group has 700 million dollars to "play with". Oh--but then you would already have preset rules for people joining your blockchain, and people would not join because of YOUR rules, so you would never have very many users. Is that why you are trying to tell me and other people on steemit how to, who, when and why to vote for?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't think, its going to work. I have a better suggestion for you. If you really have the ability to advertise Steem to 20+ million followers, then go to big brands, like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon etc.
And ask them to reward people in terms of Steem , when someone buys their product or Service. That way, we will have more stake holders in this platform and that will create more trust.
And they will get direct customers so that they can pay here, in stead of what they spend in advertising.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"For this example let’s assume the Hedge-Fund originally buys 100M Steem with 84M USD worth of Cryptocurrency."
If $84M came into the market, I doubt the price would remain at 84c
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Quite the Astute observation @spotlight.
For simplicities sake, we did not further complicate this example with details such as the one you mentioned. There are in fact many additional variables that are not mentioned in this example.
We did the best we could to really simplify an otherwise overwhelmingly complicated process.
Does this make sense to you?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Would one of those variable be exempting who has to vote the way you want them too, or exempting yourself from your own voting influence scheme?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This system would absolutely need to be universal to be effective. With no exceptions of any kind. Thank you for the clarifying question @bashadow
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Note how they complain about bots, yet use a bot to vote themselves up.
Yet it is okay for them to use them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You're obviously trolling @bashadow.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No, I just disagree with your content. Trolling would be spreading falsehoods and lies. What is the trolling activity I have done? Commenting on your post, and commenting to other commenters? Is this the "trolling activity", I am doing?
It is what steemit is about, conversation, not condemnation of a person pointing out a hypocritical action. It is like Senator Dianne Feinstein being all for banning handguns for everyone, except Her body guards.
So I will just mark you and your organization as FSDH, and make no more meaningful comments on this post, since my comments seem to have hurt your feelings to the point of you calling me a Troll.
I would like to point out to you and everybody that commented even though I disagree with you and your stance on telling people who, what, and how often a person can vote for someone, I did not flag you, nor down vote you, as you and @unikey have downvoted me. Not once but several times. Yes you have the Best interest of all steemit user at heart.
You should ask @berniesanders, how I acted when he and his house of cards and 52 downvoters, downvoted me. I survived. I continued to grow.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We assumed you were trolling because you were saying the same thing multiple times. Also, the bit about us wanting to control everyones votes?
I mean, really? Were just offering a solution to a very complex problem for the purpose of creating a conversation about how we can make steem better. We don't want to control peoples votes.
Were not even suggesting that anyones votes be controlled. Our influence mechanism would still empower everyone to choose who they are upvoting, and which curators they want to follow.
We hid your comments because we didn't think they were adding constructive feedback to the conversation.
We welcome your constructive feedback. We don't mean to shut you down.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
agreed!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
hahahahaha
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You raise valid points with regards to risks of corporate takeover and abuse. If it is possible, then one day some faction will do it.
I am hesitant to completely get behind this idea, although I do like the principles behind it. What makes me hesitant is that it further confuses the already confusing Steemit platform. I immediately wonder if I'll end up being 'punished' by the system if I end up interacting with the same people too often. It seems like it's just another fine line to learn to tread on, which makes the learning curve potentially even steeper.
To solve this I would recommend having a fairly large 'grey' area in between good and bad influence, and keep some leniency in there. Focus the actual punishments on those who really abuse, but keep in mind that most n00bs make mistakes that they may end up getting punished for. An example is the cheetah bot or Steemcleaners, which frequently visit all kinds of posts which are 'maybe' abuse but most likely n00bs not knowing what the etiquette and way to go is. We need to be soft on the n00bs, and keep in mind that those with super low steem power don't really have any ability to game the system, and perhaps they shouldn't be punished as severely as whale accounts doing something abusive. Maybe the stricter rules start at a certain SP level, or something like it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am pretty sure this is already happening.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We think so too @skycranehandwork and it will only keep happening in greater scale unless its fixed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
you get my upvote because you are raising a debate and seem to be open to discussion and objections. As this is a proposal it should be treated as one and I think peoples answers will give you the feedback you ask for. This altogether should be welcome from all who are interested.
For me this steemit cosmos is like real life starting a community from scratch in the Wild West. Democracy is not easy to take. It has aspects of regulation as well as aspects of freedom. Those are very sensitive and always on the brink of becoming out of balance.
What happens here in my view is that people struggle for regulation as much as for freedom. Exactly as in real daily life only on a greater scheme. Here it boils down and in particular the ugliness as well as the beauty can be seen.
This is the great search politicians and economic members and all the rest are having great difficulties with. Once a system is too much restrictive it fails and if it is unleashed, it fails, too.
What to do? I have no idea other than that ethics have to be put in perspective as the ground base of human action and interaction - we already have guidelines and people were telling us for thousands of years. Technical solutions alone will never bring a system to a flourishing life in the meaning of cooperation. Technical solutions have to go hand in hand with manual observation and enough freedom.
In the end no one will be truly freed from doing handy work. I myself have thought of auto-voting for those I prefer to read. I cannot have a daily overview of the people I would like to support. It is in the human core that you want to be loyal to the ones you got to know first und who treated you well. So you vote them even though the content was not very qualifiying itself.
I guess you actually know where your weakness lies as well where you can gain strength. To go outside and check your concept I call good.
I must admit that I feel backed away when I hear those big numbers like 20+ Million. I never feel attracted to them.
My position is easy. I have nothing to lose. My "minnowness" makes me quite uninteresting and if this whole thing would blow up I wouldn't care that much. Even though I put hell lot of effort in here.
It is a very personal decision - If I have a lot to lose then I would probably care much - about money, of course. So when does one reach the point where he or she doesn't care about money as well? I do not want to see a "fast grow" - but I do not know if it is a relatively single opinion here.
Last words: When I see a system fails for ethical behavior is only wanted from others but not my very first own priority in every interaction, I think it would be time for me to move on and not bothering anyone with my "opinion".
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Really good thinking going on here. Amazing how much thought you put put into a solution. The steemit community is strong, we'll do whatever it takes to to take down any and all evil bots!! ;D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Including giving up your choice of who to vote for? Of when to vote for someone? Of how often you are allowed to vote for someone?
Do you remember the Nazi Party? Or how about this quote "You are either with us, or against us." I will never surrender my rights to evil.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you! @joxus
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This has really blown my mind. I can only imagine that the independence of crypto currency would allow for that to never happen. There’s always a chance that someone could manipulate anything given the right financial backing. There seems to be way too many smart people to allow this nonsense to occur. I’ve also got a white a few good points here in the same post so there’s only one thing left to do and that’s to keep pushing
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Scare tactics, to get you to agree with them. To get you to give up your VOTE on steemit and only vote the way they want you to vote.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Huh? I mean... I vote for those whose material I like... or they act as decent beings... if anyone out there is actually reak
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes! By proactivley thinking and embodying solutions we will protect our community from all those would attempt to manipulate the steem economy for personal benefit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It’s kind of already happened though... too dogs kind of horde the wealth... but anything right now for me is great!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have a question. Why is it on the few post of yours that I have read, there is always something in it about "Redistributing Wealth", or "telling people who they can and cannot vote for".
If I want to vote for the same people over and over and over again, that is my business not yours or anyone else's business.
Oh and that 700 million powered up Steem - - - You do realize that once powered up it takes quite a bit of time to power down.
I don't, and won't.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm not sure I can properly assess the scenario you are talking about, not the solution you are suggesting. To gain my support for something like this you'd have not only to convince me that you are correct, but also to somehow gain my trust.
I actually decided to drop a line to point out that you asked for sources for the people disagreeing with you while you didn't cite any yourself.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sounds very interesting, just it is not clear to me how you "...create a swarm of bots that automatically penalize those with low influence..." How much power need those bots to significantly penalize the Hedgefond-bots who in sum are "700M worth of Steem"?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@earthnation, you don't get the crypto economy yet.
If some entity grows in power and cripples the network for its selfish interest beyond repair then we just abandon steemit, create steemit2 and move there.
Imagine that you could create another Earth. When Hitler rose in power you just creating another planet and move there - there is no need to fight him. Just left him to build his own totalitarian hell on an empty planet.
In case of evil hedge fund, it just pump our coin 10 times and left behind in empty blockchain generating coins noone will buy on open market.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Finally, someone with eyes. Thank you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
He also imagines someone could buy all Steem just like that. It just isn't that easy. This whole strategy is built upon a situation that is very unlikely to happen. Go try and buy all bitcoin or all tulips, you'll see what happens to the price. You can't just magically buy them all at the current price. The increased volume will be noticed and you have to take into account that there's only 70 million Steem liquid while majority is locked up in SP. But yes, I welcome every fund to try and buy all steem, good luck.
E: also if they were to get somehow "all the Steem" or in this case 60 million or so, they would be one of the biggest holders meaning they'd probably see growing Steem to be used by everyone as far more lucrative path than just milking it dry almost right after getting majority stake.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's hard for socialists to comprehend asset markets...or economics in general. Whoever these people are, they have no clue about anything market-related. The entire scenario that they painted, from the very start, is nothing but a BS attempt to gain power from the uneducated/uninformed, which is nothing new for people who have adopted this type of "progressive" politics/philosophy.
Even if we were to assume that a hedge fund would want to buy "all of the STEEM," they don't factor in how much STEEM is locked up in SP, as you mentioned, which is somewhere around 75% right now. So, best-case scenario, the hedge fund could only hold a maximum of 25% of all tokens.
If a hedge fund bought $100 million of STEEM at current prices (even if we assumed that the price wouldn't rise while they were buying, which would be stupid and incorrect), and the price then increased to $700 million, why would they then proceed to tank their $616 million profit rather than cash it out or reinvest it in the ecosystem or elsewhere? They would need to be "farming" accounts and posting for a very long time in order to see any returns that are comparable to that increase from prices rising. And the system would be dead long before they could take advantage of it...and they'd lose their massive profit.
My suggestion for them would be to actually learn about the blockchain, economics, and some basic math, perhaps.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The value of Bitcoin Cash is easy to see. But you need to look at its value from a FIAT currency perspective and not from a crypto currency perspective if you are going to see that value.
The word "cash" provides the biggest clue. It was no doubt chosen for the new currency because it invokes a sense of tangibility ( and normalcy ) in the minds of people. The target market for Bitcoin Cash is ordinary consumers...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There is a reasonable trade-off between inequality and growth. Ideal asset equality is when everyone has nothing. Here and now we tolerate rather significant levels of inequality. But even whales here are pretty social. For now. In future it might become a problem then we have a few solutions in hand like sqrt-like vests curve or more complicated reward system.
I do believe that the properties of open and no-barriers crypto systems prevent extreme totlitarian scenarios by themselves. We just need to take care of rough edges as soon as they become bounds to growth and development.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And as someone is sucked into the power of their reasoning tone.
No there is never a reason to be party to inequality. NEVER. Remember WWII Hitler, the Nazi's, and the final solution. There is never a reason to be party to inequality!!!!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
For socialist utopia please proceed to another blockchain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"Would you want an group that doesn't add value to steem to benefit from 20-50% of the entire steem reward pool?" As I said before, if they'd have this big of a share, it would be in their best interest to provide value. Pulling out takes time and if that would be to happen, people would eventually scoop up enough cheap Steem to make it rise again.
Or do you think they would blatantly use the system, making everyone else power down as well, hurting their profits immensely?
It's good to be thinking about these scenarios. I'll think about it, but if some major player would begin to try and get all liquid Steem, let's say 50 million out of 250 million total supply. This would drive up price insanely as in your scenario they would need to power it all up. As they drive the price up, those who have the 200 million can start selling as prices go lunatic (imagine minimal liquid Steem) and buy back lower.
These are just my initial thoughts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sounds like you're really thinking seriously about the future! You got my support if you choose to create another similar platform. I'll try it out and look into it that is.. Otherwise the swarm of bots penalizing low influence users seems most probable at a glance!
If bad bots are used to collapse the Steem economy we just have to make the good bots stronger and evolve them with ideas like this beeing brought to the surface. I really hope you get a lot of feedback on this. Peace!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Excellent work and solutions to prevent corporate takeover
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
While I agree that there should be a system where voting is weighted based upon activity, I don't necessarily agree with your specific solution. You have raised some interesting issues. It should be discussed and debated by the community and the developers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like the idea to reward those that upvote good contents from different users, and penalize those who upvote always the same users.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If something like this was attempted, and the price started to rise I think we would see many more people (and possibly funds) flock to steem and buy steem as well, which would further drive up prices which would attract more attention and more people would buy etc etc etc. I get what you are trying to say here, but I don't think the scenario would work out quite how you are portraying it to in your example.
The other thing to keep in mind, once that hedge fund has $700 milllion powered up and can make $25 million per year, they have to keep that 700 million powered up to keep making that amount. Them dumping all that steem on the market couldn't happen for at least 3.5 years for them to even make a tiny profit on their original $84 million invested...
Unless the plan was simply to run the price up and then cash out based on the capital appreciation, but that is more along the lines of a simple pump and dump and very different than what you are talking about here in regards to powering up that $700 million...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That reads like some really reasonable solutions. Some might need a little finetuning, but all in all I like the way you are thinking. Has someone pitched this to steemit inc. ?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
We have had a hard time finding a way to approach the founders of steem/steemit.
How do we get in contact with them @bypaul?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Im too new myself to have any connections. However I asked around a bit, maybe some people can do something
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey Paul... I’m a
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey Paul ;D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good times
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
lol, after reading down this far, this exchange made me nearly snort coffee :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That can not be pleasent. It will most likely end horribly wrong...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
haha I meant outwardly, not inwardly :D hahahahahaha
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ooohhh shiiittteee... 😂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's a really scary scenario. I'll admit I don't know near enough about how the Steem blockchain works to know whether or not something like that would ever be possible.
I just love the concept of being able to get paid for putting together content.
I know that SteemIt has changed a ton since I joined last October. I don't know if it's become exactly what the founders intended, or something else entirely.
One thing I will say is that it's an exciting ride, and there are lots of cool people here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'd suggest you try both solutions. First, we have to maintain the steemit platform and keep it from any form of discrepancies.
And it'd be nice to have another steemit like application/platform running on the steem blockchain
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I support you too, of course so hoping for the best in this situation, trying to save the system or create a new one better, wow, lets rock this boat and either sink or swim. be well and keep us posted on the progress i know you will. @earthnation
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks earthnation, as a minnow, I am always thrilled to see the brilliance people are using to develop Steemit! upvoted and following
@dakini5d
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I really love SteemIt and the community as well. I agree that this market can be manipulated, but at the same time, all markets can be. There are some unknown variables in this situation that is not being accounted for, but it does definitely show some vulnerabilities!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 81.91 % upvote from @upgoater thanks to: @earthnation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Don't give them ideas :) On a more serious note it is great article and we should think about that
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ha! My first reaction was "thanks for the game plan," but I don't have that level of resources...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
:p
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
:o :p Thank you!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice dear
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Fork it! 🙂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
May be this is already happening.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have a problem with this. You are telling me that I can't vote for the people I like. I have several people that I like to vote on, mainly because the quality of their content is consistently excellent.
In my opinion, what you are suggesting is tyranny. If I want my influence to increase and be able to vote, I would have to vote for people that have content that is no better than cat posters on Facebook.
If you really want to fix the problem, then get rid of the damn bots and make it impossible for bots to work. Make it to where you have to use your own votes and power to actually vote on good content.
Here's how this works. I vote for things that I like, and that's why I don't vote for all the bitcoin, litecoin, etc posts and vote on art, science, creative writing posts.
I'm sorry, @earthnation, but I really don't like your idea. I think it's a makeshift patch at best.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you have a better solution.....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm just a steam user, and I enjoy this platform, and while I have a problem with it from time to time, but I'm not about to go the extreme of punishing people for liking what they like.
I still believe it's tyranny to tell someone what they have to like and how they have to like it.
In my opinion, banning bots would be a good place to start. In addition, if people treated this like a content site, not an investment center, it would also help.
But people will be people and people with money will always seek a way to make more money.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Correct. Vote buying is the no. 1 weak point and value killer on this platform and you perfectly demonstrated that with your own post.
EDIT:
People like you who promote "minnow support" while they buy attention for themselves are the ones that are destroying this eco-system. Why did you flag the bots that you paid (at the end of this thread)? To hide that your payout was not earned but purchased? Why don't you practice real minnow support instead of just talking about it?
Where do you live? In La-La-Land?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @surfermarly we covered these points earlier in the conversation thread.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oddly enough, this post was upvoted by bots.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Its not that bots are bad @preparedwombat. So long as they are used correctly. For instance, were paying a small fee to have our post boosted to trending, so that more people can become aware of us and the solutions we are bringing to the Steem Community.
If people do not like what we have to offer, they can simply flag us and shoot us down. Which has happened a few times.... we've lost over 100 dollars to downvotes since joining.
Mercenary up-vote bots when used in a good way help good content to rise and be seen. Bad content won't stay on top for long without being flagged down.
Does this make sense to you?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
But pretty much everybody thinks that their content getting flagged is inherently abuse.
They all have what they think are good reasons why their stuff should not be flagged but it's okay for them to flag, as with your swarm of bots.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Indeed. It is a complicated issue @preparedwombat. All we can do is the best we can do! Here's to a supportive and enabling steem culture.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Interesting scenario but the problem is there really isn't enough steem for sale for a hedge fund to do that. Plus, if steem went up to $7 a lot folks would sell and be happy @earthnation. You might be right though. Still one thing about the influence if people like me with a 14.4k modem half the time have a hard time voting on many posts. There are a lot of people like this throughout the world and on Steemit. They are excellent posters, trying make money and build Steemit with excellent quality posts but...influence?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very interesting. Hmmm. I can't say I understand it all but I'll read it another time or two. Thank you for the information.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I resteemed for visibility and further discussion. Not sure if this could be a valid solution.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I hate to break it to you but this is already the MO of many on Steemit 😂 You included by the looks of all the vote services you're using.
I don't buy it, I don't think it's as vulnerable to that kind of attack, there's way too many variables for your scenario to play out and also it looks like your math is off.
💩
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I agree with your solutions.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not sure that I fully comprehend what you wrote here but it sounds sensible.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@dannyshine Please let us know if anything in particular was especially unclear, or if we can further elaborate on any specific point.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Dear all,
I make a facebook group for steemit Vot and Comment. evrybody can join in my group. this is the link. Click hear for join........ ill add you https://m.me/join/AbYsEkpXB2Ys7ahN
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Dear all,
I make a facebook group for steemit Vot and Comment. evrybody can join in my group. this is the link. Click hear for join........ ill add you https://m.me/join/AbYsEkpXB2Ys7ahN
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Let me share where I see the flaw.
While temporarily that 100 M Steem would be worth $700 M, it does not mean that the hedge fund has 700 M Steem Power.
For general understanding, here's one simple equation we are forgetting may be.
The whole argument is based on the assumption that the fund has 700 M SP, which it does not have.
Secondly, Steem is a blockchain and nothing of that magnitude can stay hidden. Anyone with programming, coding knowledge can retrieve data from the blockchain (it's open source) and display. I know a friend who used to list self-voters as per number of self votes, their worth, frequency etc.
Thirdly, who are you kidding? A bot upvotes your post and then the comment from that bot is upvoted by the same bot sponsored by another account named similar to the bot that upvoted in the first place. Seems like someone has a farm in place.
STEEMIANS, HELP MY COMMENT RISE ABOVE THE BOT COMMENT
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @ilyastarar. Our understanding is that when steem is converted into steem power, its converted at the rate at which steem is worth.
Meaning, 1 steem turns into .84 steem power if steem is worth 84 cents.
Also meaning, 1 steem turns into 7 steem power if steem is worth 7 dollars.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @earthnation,
Then please be informed that your understanding flawed as I pointed out. SP is basically frozen Steem and its value is same as that of Steem because it is Steem.
If you look at the image above, you will see that I bought 5.960 Steem by paying 6 Steem Dollars. Then, the amount of Steem I received was immediately powered up. Exact same amount of SP I got.
Hope you understand. I am a minnow but I did put in a lot of effort to learn about Steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 31.51 % upvote from @lovejuice thanks to: @earthnation. They love you, so does Aggroed. Please be sure to vote for Witnesses at https://steemit.com/~witnesses.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 1.96 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @earthnation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 47.14 % upvote from @buildawhale thanks to: @earthnation. Send at least 1 SBD to @buildawhale with a post link in the memo field for a portion of the next vote.
To support our daily curation initiative, please vote on my owner, @themarkymark, as a Steem Witness
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Increasing the price of Steem is much better, why suppressed it.
We should invite more hedge funders in that case.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 40.01 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @earthnation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good job! Thanks to @dakotakaiser you have planted 0.13 tree to save Abongphen Highland Forest in Cameroon. Help me to plant 1,000,000 trees and share my Steem Power to the others. Selfvoting is prohibited, but that should be the reason to spread the world to protect our precious environment. Check out profile of our conservation association @kedjom-keku and the founder/coordinator @martin.mikes to get more information about our conservation program. My current SP is 14295.79. Help me to plant more trees with your delegated SP.
Thanks a lot,
your @treeplanter
www.kedjom-keku.com
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 37.50 % upvote from @steemthat thanks to: @earthnation. Thank you for your support. Delegate Steem Power In 3 Seconds... SteemThat.com
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received a 62.50 % upvote from thanks to: @earthnation.
For more information, click here!!!!
The Minnowhelper team is still looking for investors (Minimum 10 SP), if you are interested in this, read the conditions of how to invest click here!!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
90.00% @pushup from @earthnation
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post has received gratitude of 100.00 % from @appreciator thanks to @earthnation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
tnx
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
tnx
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very Intersting post @earthnation
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I simply like your information @earthnation
Please up-vote and follow me @hatimbenya
Thank you
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
VERY HI REGULATION PICTURE.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This post received a 4% upvote from @morwhale team thanks to @earthnation! For more information, click here! , TeamMorocco! .
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nope!!! For months
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There already is a duplicate of steemit it is https://golos.io/
Not as popular though
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Does it have an English version?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I dont think so, I am not that familiar with it, but I think the point was just to create a russian version duplicate of steemit with their own crypto currency
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/golos/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The #en tag there covers posts in English.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think your reason is flawed from the start. If any hedge-fund decides to go in, you would see many more follow the law. So a single entity wouldn't be able to do the loss, because now they have to compete against other hedge-funds and financial entities.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Interesting information thanks for posting!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This evaluations totally shocked me
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good content.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great informative post
Please up-vote and follow me @earthnation
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
yes,we are also love steemit.in here you just put on some news on steemit,that was very good.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like the idea to reward the upvotes for good contents. It fits with the main vision.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
nice post
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
hy
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What happens, if someone hacks into the Data Service ? And what is the definition of engagement ? How would you define that ?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
we discussed this earlier in the thread @kawsar11
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
uhm waow 0.o
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The post has been liked by bots which apparently isn't bad like you say "if used correctly."
I up voted because some thought was been put into a solution.
But describing bot usage as right and wrong just from one side of things will not be the answer.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steem has so many levels of understanding that for a newly minted minnow swimming in an ocean seemingly filled with tiger sharks and the occasional dolphin whale that who knows what the meaning of anything is I look forward to knowing more about this as time goes on and I read more posts and find myself more deeply down the whirlpool of the rabbit hole ☺
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
thank for your information ...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
nice good follow me and vote me
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think your argument is flawed from the start. If any hedge-fund decides to go in, you would see many more follow the suit. So a single entity would be able to do the damage, because now they have to compete against other hedge-funds and financial entities.
Besides the fact that, it would be much more beneficial for any financial entity to implement win-win strategy, and find out being in on Steem would give them financial advantage over others.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
nice
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hope this to be secure enough
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
steem ..i love this..most
it changed my world
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @earthnation! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Award for the number of posts published
Award for the number of upvotes received
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh nice blog man nice very nice yeah
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Follow me and I will follow you back @krishnabhusal
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
oh.great for us
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very interesnting.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
a very intelligent respons bro
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
nice post
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
we are follow me.i well follow you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice post...
bcak me vote and Commenta...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations @earthnation!
Your post was mentioned in the hit parade in the following categories:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Amazing
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Amazing
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice post...
bcak me vote and Comments...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit