I think there needs to be a critical look on the whole thing-- the inflated ego, in this context, is the very act of inflating mediocrity to importance--that's not to say that mediocrity is necessarily bad, just that the internet itself is the peoples platform--mediocrity is the point that everyone can paint, everyone can sing, and so on--but when it enters a system of reward and reputation, intent on reward and reputation, than what else can it do but conflate with the ego with what it see's as success--(poor grammar and spelling is no excuse for success)
Some people succeed, without the smear of inflated ego, because they are genuine in their approach-- How many have seen this genuine approach (or read an article explaining the keys to success) and attempted to emulate it--the term "original content" is now on the drawing boards--the intent: success.
Thank you for your comments! Good discussion piece and yes i will continue to write. I am dyslexic and bad grammar, spelling, doesn't bother me when i see it on others, as i often slip up, but cannot edit quick enough. If i did, i would never, ever write! Some of the most amazing pieces are ignored because of this i feel. I like to discuss things, have the debate, as posted above. Its great to learn and get other perspectives. Thank you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I understand the sentiment of stream of conscious writing as mistakes happen or words are accidently left out at gathering an idea or observation, whatever it is (I have plenty of chicken scratch papers that needed to be written in the moment--and some are better for it), but in this platform, in this article feeding context (and this is no attack on you) I don't understand why people don't just proofread after they write, then click post--how can it be a bad thing? Technology can delete and type at a whim-- I almost feel that some people are on the idea that it's rebellious to not spell correctly or use (at least) good grammar--to not play by the rules, but these rules are superficial at most--all the while, the principle by which they conduct their writing is still adherring to the rules of a system within boundaries and governed on rewards, and most importantly, left unquestioned, because as I was saying in my first comment, the intention is convoluted in money making and attention getting (what may have worked might have been the articles written fast and sloppy, "the content matters most", I agree-- but, the eyes gleam at 'punk' as a brand, which goes against the very idea of punk itself, lacking any so-called intrinsic substance. In the Philippines they understand the meaning of 'plastic' people, because they see it on TV, the internet--they're outside of the bubble)--
Some articles, I have no idea what they're even talking about, not only because of bad grammar and spelling or words missing, but because they seem to fixate solely on using words that create the image and facade of their attempted brand (philosopher, spiritually connected, anarchist, blah blah--) moreso than the message.
And yes, my dear keep writing--I only deleted that portion of my comment earlier because my phone spazzed the 'post' button and I didn't want to come off mistakenly sarcastic or mean. You replied too fast, :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Haha sorry i have a habit of replying fast...no good with procrastination or patience i'm afraid. I didn't take it as mean or sarcasticso no worries there. I get what you mean about rushing to blindly post about stuff without due care or knowledge. Yes i agree that doesn't allow Steemit to develop the better content and clogs up the system somewhat. I have no idea sometimes with what a lot of people write and switch off very quickly at times. But i do like simple reading.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit