What about ordering a statestician, scientist, economist or similiar to create a system that they can prove is going to distribute the rewards fairly. They probably have a lot of relevant experience.
RE: IMPROVING Steemit's REWARDS Structure - Creation of the REWARDS POOL
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
IMPROVING Steemit's REWARDS Structure - Creation of the REWARDS POOL
Fairly is a subjective term. It's easier to see value in what I create than what someone else creates. Human nature I believe.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I didn't say fairness is an objective term.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
but you mentioned scientist. Scientist is normally hard-evidence and about objective truth. Then you mention distributing the reward fairly. Kinda infers that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit