Why ALL Cops are BAD! (in 5 Minutes)

My only request as you watch this video (or read this article), is that you try set aside emotions, family ties, personal experiences (whatever)… and take a serious look through the lens of OBJECTIVITY. If you disagree with the assertions I’m making, please, use logic in the comments section to state your opposing position. I’m not into censorship, so even if you use a lamebrain argument to make your case (like; "my brother bobby was in law enforcement for 21 years and he’s a good cop," or, "I AM a cop and I KNOW I’m good and this is extremely offensive," or "Let’s just see who you call the next time you’re in trouble") even if you use these unsubstantiated statements it won’t be deleted. (they can't be deleted in a blockchain anyway...this is mostly if you want to leave a comment under my YouTube Video) But I wanna save you the embarrassment of posting something stupid.

Here's my video...or you can just read my article:

I’d say a majority of people believe that most cops are good. Almost nowhere can you find public discourse on police misconduct without references to "a few bad apples" on the one hand or "exceptions to the rule," on the other.

When I say "there are no good cops," I do NOT mean that there are no cops who do good things. That claim could be easily disproven using examples such as the Texas sheriff who subverts state and federal law by refusing to jail people for marijuana possession or the cops who delivered Christmas gifts instead of tickets. Although, if you're delivering Christmas presents to some people after having stolen the money to buy those gifts from others…this could hardly be considered a completely "good deed." (Doh!) And certainly not all police "officers" use unnecessary force. So why do I claim that there can be no such thing as a good cop?

We need NOT enumerate what proportion of cops appears to be good or listen to someone's anecdote about his uncle Charlie who he could swear up and down that he’s an allegedly good cop.
We need only consider the following:
(1) A cop receives his pay from forcefully extracted stolen resources by a criminal cartel who holds a monopoly on force
(2) A cop's job is to enforce the arbitrary "laws" of his cartel - ALL of them
(3) Many of the laws are manifestly unjust, and some are even cruel and wicked;
(4) Therefore, every cop has to VOLUNTARILY agree to participate in a criminal organization that holds a monopoly on force, benefit from ongoing acts of theft AND act as an enforcer of "laws" (merely the COMMANDS of political puppets) that are manifestly unjust or even cruel and wicked.

By their very decision to VOLUNTARILY participate in such crime, there can be NO "good cops."

And for those who would object at this point and argue that taxation (the very LIFEBLOOD that keeps the cartel alive) is NOT theft, the burden of proof rests on YOU to objectively PROVE that taking something from someone without their willingness to freely consent, ISN’T theft. Theft by any other name (taxation) is still theft, even when it’s initiated by that MAGICAL ENTITY called “government.” IF you disagree, you’ve been taught to believe and propagate an incredibly destructive lie.

(1) Everyone who is honest with themselves HAS to admit: If a non-police officer (some call us "civilians") went around doing what cops do; pulling people over for arbitrary reasons, stopping people in the street, breaking into homes because someone possessed something that person didn’t want the homeowner to possess, kidnapping, perpetual theft….THAT "civilian" who was performing the same actions as law enforcement, would be arrested by the cops

If you're a cop (and you're reading this), you must know that you've agreed that it's okay to derive your pay from the FORCED extraction of funds from the working class (aka "taxation"). Therefore, being a cop, by it's very nature ENDORSES theft! There is NO WAY around this. Just being a cop is inherently IMMORAL on that ONE point alone....and this doesn't even scratch the surface!

Now a great irony begins to emerge when you understand the simple truth that cops exist by a seemingly magical edict that places a monopoly on force through the theft of the populous! Here’s the irony, a cop will carry out a seemingly noble act, by arresting and imprisoning a man who has stolen from another while the organization he works for is currently in the business of stealing from the people the officer claims to protect. Can there be a greater irony?

Another incredible irony materializes when you consider what happens when a cop arrests you for transgressing the arbitrary edicts of psychopathic, power-hungry politicians: That is this: you are then taken before another state-funded agent in a black robe…(the high priest of this magical governmental religious system) called a judge.

Has anyone ever asked themselves “How can I have a fair trial if the judge works for and with the very people who just attacked and arrested me? YOU CAN'T!!! One state agent (a cop) invades your world, tells you that you broke one of their psychopath’s commands, steals your money through something called a "fine," or a "ticket," kidnaps you, CAGES you and forces you to appear before a judge (another state agent) who then decides how much you will pay or how long you must spend in one of their state-funded prison cells.

Let me ask you: what's the distinction between a kidnapping ring and the police, or between the police and the Mafia? The key distinction is that the police have a "legal" monopoly. Providing a competing service is illegal, and the police — the beneficiaries of the monopoly privilege — are the enforcers. They forestall competition at gunpoint, like the Mob, but under color of law.

Take Ferguson, for example, where police stopped Oath Keepers from protecting private businesses from looters, even though the police were unable to do the job themselves.

If you reject the Mafia, then you should reject the police, just as you (presumably) reject other criminal organizations that, as part of their core mission, violate people’s rights. You didn't vote for the police. They are not accountable to you in any meaningful way. You are not in any way morally obliged to consent to their jurisdiction over you. They are just one more gang, but with government approval.

It's not the apples that are bad — it's the ENTIRE barrel...the whole system!

This argument over whether police are “good” is not about the actions of individual cops; anyone can argue about the details of 900,000 individuals doing their jobs, some with the best of intentions. It's about a system — a system cops voluntarily participate in — a system that both perpetrates and perpetuates injustice, and one that violently eliminates competitors who would both respect and protect individual rights.

So, back to cops:
If you had a friend that you knew worked for the most notorious criminal cartel your region has ever known...a cartel that FORCEFULLY extracts funds from people who are unwilling to be stolen from...a cartel who unjustly fines people for transgressing their arbitrary edicts....a cartel who constantly sticks it's nose into other people's private affairs...and you knew that this friend of your was paid by the booty this cartel collected from the common people...could you, by the standard of objectivity, really call this person a "good guy?" If so, I would question your ability to call anything good or evil. Because THEFT (by ANY other name (ie, taxation) is still THEFT and it is still wrong!

So, those who benefit by receiving a paycheck that wouldn't exist without that theft are, at the very least, accomplices in an ongoing criminal activity from the very criminal organization with which he has CHOSEN to align himself.

---

I'm Brian. I make video content for my HighImpactFlix Channel. Cheers!