RE: Steemit took down @thedarkoverlord

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Steemit took down @thedarkoverlord

in steemit •  6 years ago  (edited)

Flagged for intentionally spreading FUD by using a misleading blockchain diagram that has nothing to do with anything.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  6 years ago (edited)

@inertia there are only two possibilities here:

  1. You are too stupid to not be able to see association between blockchain diagram and Steem blockchain and decentralization. And you are too stupid that you think that writing about Steemit censoring the world wide known hacker group is FUD.

  2. You are doing this on purpose because this is your task as a censor.

I like option 1.

So what does that blockchain diagram have to do with STEEMIT "censoring/deleting" their account when their account is STILL on the blockchain, the comments and votes are STILL on the block chain and saying that they're REMOVED is FUD, especially if you know the distinct difference between STEEM and SteemitINC.

He's doing it on purpose because he's "censoring" you because curation is censorship, because the front end deciding on what to show or not to from the blockchain is the equivalent of them editing the data on the chain. Because why not admit that you're mistaken, that if you knew there was a difference you didn't bother to mention that critical aspect, either because you forgotten or because you are a drama queen, instead of doubling down on this, because clearly that BLOCKCHAIN DIAGRAM implies they were removed from the blockchain, not "phrased" out by a front end script and that diagram has no relevance to them being phrased out byba front end script, and if you knew they weren't deleted you'd have mentioned or remarked or hinted at that somewhere in your post, but you didn't, you chose to deceive by misleading directly because of that diagram that has nothing to do with Steemit or what hapoened with our comments.

Posted using Partiko Android

I still like option 1.

Some people like to see the world burn.

Posted using Partiko Android

Not me, I just hate to see a bunch of assholes, who are afraid to post with their real names, gang up on a low SP holder with a bunch of nonsense. They could have left a comment saying: Hey pal, you used the wrong graphic because ....., could you change that? But no; blah, blah, ...FLAG!!

The only thing flags are good for is starting Dumpster Fires, well, Dumpster Fires started. Good luck finding all of them. Hint; at least 400 dead accounts are among my 600 followers. I'm sick of inner circle Bull Shit, you only want us to buy your Steem, but we're not welcome to play with it. No, then you enforce some unwritten rules you make up on the spot by flagging and then badgering the Dog Shit out of a fellow Steemian.

None of you; @baah, @actifit-peter, @inertia, @elgeko, and @kabir88 are regular followers of @boyanpro and yet you all show up on the same post. Don't you dare tell me it's coincidence, I checked! You all came here to have some fun, huh?

Hope y'all feel better. Tell Bernie he missed out. Edit: I guess you forgot to invite him to the party.

I couldn't write it better my self. If I would have thousands of SP I would use it to flag NSFW, spam and similar garbage. I wouldn't use it on thoughts not aligned to mine. But that's just me thinking how grownups should act.

With lots of SP, my primary concern would be material that could get all of us into legal trouble; either through law-suits or a government looking for another excuse to regulate. Other than that, everyone is at liberty to ignore or mute posts and content creators they don't like and create their own utopian or dystopian world.

Spam, NSFW, and other garbage is not my problem, I have the choice to ignore it. People abusing the reward pool is not my problem either. If the developers thought it was a problem they should have fixed it but didn't. There must be a reason for that :)

Thank you for the transfer! :)

Posted using Partiko Android

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Flagging was directly created to deal with people abusing their stake. It's in the whitepaper. People have as much of a right to curate things as no value or negative value as they do to curate things as valuable. If you think that ignoring or muting abusive content such as FUD is sensible, next time some violation occurs to you or your loved ones I expect you to ignore it also, so that especially when people flag FUD you ignore them, regardless if you considered it FUD or not, else you have no right to ask people do what you yourself failed at doing.

FUD deserves all the flags it gets, as does Spam or slander.

Posted using Partiko Android

Btw, grownups ask "Why are you asking stupid questions"? It must be grown up to call me an ass kisser and talk about the extent of my abilities, and it must also be Grown Up to persistently defend a misleading diagram and call people stupid while repeatedly making indications about their ability to comprehend.

Posted using Partiko Android

So what if nobody follows him? This got resteemed by someone I follow. I pointed out exactly what others pointed out ONLY because he keept justifying the misleading diagram, had he any sense he would have corrected his mistake instead of digging his hole, and maybe people would have removed the flags once he changed it.

Flags are necessary for EXACTLY his behavior, because people have a right to curate bullshit and FUD as poor or no value content.

Posted using Partiko Android

...Aaaand I have the right to disagree. There are real problems you could spend your time on instead of this B.S. But hey, it's your time :)

BTW, it's not possible to lay insult at an anonymous entity. You did know that, right? Nudge, nudge, wink, wink.

Thank you for your time. Have a good one. Cheers!

With what, you couldn't even bother to say with what you disagree before making this about "real" problems. I can point out misleading FUD purely for my own amusement.

Posted using Partiko Android

I never knew calling out FUD could only happen if the person spreading it is above a certain SP, and that doing otherwise is nonsense and makes one an asshole who's bullying "the low SP account" and that it's not nonsense or bullshit to encourage FUD, it's called "sticking it to the man" and speaking for the great "everything that the blockchain stands for" especially when it has absolutely nothing to do with what the blockchain stands for or blockchain period. /s

Posted using Partiko Android

Onno Vocks is my real name, you will see soon enough.

No, you are having trouble to comprehend some basic things here. So let me help you by explaining this. The blockchain diagram implies how fraudulent is Steemit's behavior. That they are ruining the very nature of the blockchain by artificially changing its order. The blockchain diagram is reminder what all of this here should be about. BTW I never wrote that they removed them from the blockchain.

They haven't changed the blockchain, they aren't fraudulent, and what they've done isn't ruining "the very nature of blockchain". That's why not only doesn't the diagram not have anything to do with what happened, at all, using it to imply any of the things as far as "how fraudulent steemit's behavior" is amounts to FUD.

Posted using Partiko Android

Of course they haven't changed the blockchain, they just changed its appearance. I sincerely feel sorry for you because you are not able to understand this basic statement.

You said they "artificially changed it's order". Of course I will point out that they didn't change the blockchain. If you think I don't have the "ability" to understand the difference between a front end and a back end you'd better reserve that "pitty" for someone else. Keep evading the consequences for posting a misleading diagram or for making misleading statements about what steemit did or didn't do by making this about what my capacities are, I don't know who you think you're fooling with that but certainly ain't me.

Posted using Partiko Android

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

The key word here is "artificially". So, if you buy artificial banana, that's not real banana, please be careful, don't eat it.

The key is still false. They didn't change the blockchain, artificially or otherwise. It has nothing to do with the blockchain, stop making it about "what everything the blockchain stands for" because you're getting nowhere with that utter nonsense.

Posted using Partiko Android

No, you got it completely all wrong. My comments was never about "what everything the blockchain stands for". My comments were completely opposite. I was stating that STINC is ruining "everything the blockchain stands for".

Upvoted, for intentionally spreading FOMO. :)