Tonight
I accidentally tapped the underlined posts count, and at first I thought, "this probably shows only the actual posts by the user, not resteems!"
No, sorry. But it could, and should. So I am writing this to say so.
😎
We can't stop here! This is Whale country!
Loki was born in Australia, now is wandering Amsterdam again after 9 months in Sofia, Bulgaria. IT generalist, physics theorist, futurist and cyber-agorist.
Loki's life mission is to establish a secure, distributed layer atop the internet, and enable space migration, preferably while living in a beautiful mountain house somewhere with a good woman, and lots of farm animals and gardens, where he can also go hunting and camping.
"I'm a thoughtocaster, a conundrummer in a band called Life Puzzler. I've flipped more lids than a monkey in a soup kitchen, of the mind."
- Xavier, Renegade Angel
All images in the above post are either original from me, or taken from Google Image Search, filtered for the right of reuse and modification, and either hotlinked directly, or altered by me.
Absofrikinlutely. Separate resteems from other content in all ways.
Right now I don't resteem even the most awesome content, because it would mess up my blog page and also because I know that I don't myself like to follow anyone that resteems a lot. (it crowds my feed too much)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very good suggestion!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It also includes comments, which is weird. Why not count articles and comments separately? I like discussion, but comments typically take less effort and most people will post more comments than articles.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agreed, this is needed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit