Steemit a good platform with many benefits that make it unique and extraordinary.
the opportunity to write and win at the same time, makes very good steemit, but that is not all, everyone involved wins, the author of the article, the commenting and voting.
Steemit still in its beta phase, is improving every day, the page with the problems it has had, one hacking who stole 85 thousand dollars to more than 200 accounts, the page gave an effective response, which generates confidence its users.
but all is not rosy, there are many things to correct, I see that there is good content that still do not receive the expected support, and other items without any content, earning much more.
as this is possible, perhaps no more value in an original article where those users express their ideas, and spend days writing them or trying to give quality content for all of us.
it has no more value, rather should not have more value?
I'm not the only one these questions is done.
There are many users who have the same complaints, as expressed in this article.
They should seek solutions to incetivar, authors who make good content, but are not adequately rewarded. I think it's a necessary change, seeking greater equality, and for the good of this community.
I'll give you my upvote.
Please reciprocate in my post https://steemit.com/introduceyourself/@gustavopasquini/hello-steemers-new-member-introduced-in-steemit-community-video
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
thanks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
great quality
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit