RE: Curation rewards 2.0: A Technical Proposal on revamping voting rewards to incentivize high-quality Digital Curation on Steemit.

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Curation rewards 2.0: A Technical Proposal on revamping voting rewards to incentivize high-quality Digital Curation on Steemit.

in steemit •  8 years ago 

I agree with you that any post gone for the first 30 minutes is less likely to get famous again if they are not on the trending part.

steemit
8 years ago by

Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

  • Disagreement on rewards
  • Fraud or plagiarism
  • Hate speech or trolling
  • Miscategorized content or spam

Submit
$0.00
    2 votes
    2
    Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
    If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
    Sort Order:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
      ·  8 years ago 

    But yes, if an post does not attract votes in the thirty minutes, it is also likely that they does not have good contents.

    Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

    • Disagreement on rewards
    • Fraud or plagiarism
    • Hate speech or trolling
    • Miscategorized content or spam

    Submit
    $0.00
      1 vote
      [-]
        ·  8 years ago (edited)

      @nomorealex, There should be some specific changes which could be made to encourage finding new content not simply being the Nth person to approve of a post.

      Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

      • Disagreement on rewards
      • Fraud or plagiarism
      • Hate speech or trolling
      • Miscategorized content or spam

      Submit
      $0.00
        8 votes