I hear you on this and there's probably still a growing amount of people that are joining content-based social networks for the first time, such that Steemit does not need to incentivize users of the existing social networks to leave. But doing so would accelerate growth in the short-run, for sure
RE: The distribution-monetary rewards tradeoff and a proposal to accelerate the disruption of incumbent social networks
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The distribution-monetary rewards tradeoff and a proposal to accelerate the disruption of incumbent social networks
But shouldn't be more valuable an organic development ?
If we brainstorm this discussion started by you I'm positive that we will find a decent compromise.
One of the big issues n this stage (childhood ) here, on steemit, is the monetsry gap. Not the value, the reach, the differences between approaches, battles of different philosophical points of view or other profound and jmportant issues to discuss.
We are at hte beginning of a revolution. And this is a heavy burden for devs.
Even if I like your idea I think it's not the time for it and not in this form.
We need to coagulate the community, to strengthen it, not to rush things. Even important things on the long run.
Very good post. Not do easy to find these days on a social platform.
Cheers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit