RE: Steemit took down @thedarkoverlord

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Steemit took down @thedarkoverlord

in steemit •  6 years ago 

With lots of SP, my primary concern would be material that could get all of us into legal trouble; either through law-suits or a government looking for another excuse to regulate. Other than that, everyone is at liberty to ignore or mute posts and content creators they don't like and create their own utopian or dystopian world.

Spam, NSFW, and other garbage is not my problem, I have the choice to ignore it. People abusing the reward pool is not my problem either. If the developers thought it was a problem they should have fixed it but didn't. There must be a reason for that :)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Thank you for the transfer! :)

Posted using Partiko Android

In the spirit of lucylin. I also resteemd that post :)

This something I've done repeatedly when people got flagged. Including the message: "It wasn't his vote to take."

I doubt I can keep that up when the flagging gets intense though. Consider it support for future as my vote is only 0.04.

Take care :)

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Flagging was directly created to deal with people abusing their stake. It's in the whitepaper. People have as much of a right to curate things as no value or negative value as they do to curate things as valuable. If you think that ignoring or muting abusive content such as FUD is sensible, next time some violation occurs to you or your loved ones I expect you to ignore it also, so that especially when people flag FUD you ignore them, regardless if you considered it FUD or not, else you have no right to ask people do what you yourself failed at doing.