On the 31st March 2016 an account with the name @freedom was set up on steemit. This account is the second largest account on Steemit behind @steemit, which is Steemit Incs official account.
Who is this Freedom Character? This has remained an unanswered question on Steemit for a long time now. In fact not long after I joined Steemit @aggroed covered the same topic with the post 'The twelve million dollar miner: who is @freedom?'
https://steemit.com/freedom/@aggroed/the-twelve-million-dollar-miner-who-is-freedom
I would really suggest that you read this post, as it made a starting point for me and the analysis I carried out to try and answer this question. Who is Freedom?
The Basics and Background
@freedom has never made a post, however this account has voted and has also set a proxy for witness voting. Although not currently voting, @freedom is now leasing out its Steem Power and is earning benefactor rewards. @freedom is very much active on Steemit.
@Freedom was set up in the first week as a mining account. Here are some very interesting facts
Taken from https://steemworld.org/@freedom
I recently looked at some data on Recovery accounts and found that 155 accounts were mined at the start that contained a recover account other than @steemit. However there are only 9 distinct recover accounts for these 155 accounts..
One of these is @paladin.
@freedom is a witness, so is @paladin. @paladin is account 519. It was set up after @freedom and also have a witness proxy set to @pumpkin. I find it interesting that @paladin has @steem as a recovery account
@pumpkin is also a witness, and like @paladin it has a recovery account of @steem. An official Steem Inc. account
My First three suspects, @paladin, @pumpkin or Steem Inc.(@steemit @steem @steemitadmin)
Steemit Inc. is a suspect, but when looking into all of this it was pointed out to me by @teamsteem
“One other interesting fact is that @misterdelegation has almost the same amount of SP than Freedom. Misterdelegation is from Steemit Inc.”
Does this mean that Steemit Inc. respected the fact that Freedom needed to be the largest SP holders and so not be Steemit Inc. but an investor?
Delving into the Data
Using steemsql which is held by @acrange and using my favorite tool, Power BI, I have set up a number of queries to look deeper into the data.
My first query was to look at the Account Updates for @freedom . This is because @paladin was set up after @freedom, yet @paladin is the recover account for freedom. I can also see from steemworld.com that @freedom had an account update. However this gave me very little detail.
The next point of call was to try and establish relationships between @freedom and other steemit accounts. Without reinventing the wheel, I have taken the following list from @aggroed posts. These accounts have been connected to @freedom as miner accounts that powered down directly to @freedom. @paladin appears again!
@testdrive, @skywalker, @simpson, @paladin, @moment, @microsoft, @klm, @galaxy, @firstclass, @fantasy, @excalibur, @eternity, @disney, @diaphanous, @butterfly, @books, @commedy, @bmw, @blackjack, @apple, @alphabet @bitcoin2016
By Observation of the Accounts table in the database I have also taken the following accounts
@freedom-1, @freedom-2, @freedom-3 , @freedom-4, @freedom-5 ,@freedom-6 ,@freedom-7 ,@freedom-8 , @freedom-9, @paladin-1, @paladin-2, @paladin-3, @paladin-4, @paladin-5,
Voting
First Looking at the Votes table together these accounts case 4297 votes to 175 distinct authors. If I filter this down to 2016 there are 157 unique authors and 3819 votes. The table below on the left shows the number of votes case by each of the accounts and the average weight in 2016 and on the right we can see the authors sorted by the number of votes received
We can clearly see from this that @dantheman received the most votes from this bunch in 2016. However I am excluding @dan from this analysis because it has already been looked at in detail if @freedom is @dan
If we drill down a little further to see the votes cast from March – 31 May 16
And filtering this further to see just the votes from @freedom
We now have two further name we can add to our list of possible suspect’s @xeroc and @testz
@xeroc has their account details set up and can be traced back to a person. Looking at recent activity shows votes on posts relating to bitshares.
@testz maybe another official steemit account?. Looking at recent activity on steemd.com/@testz, this account is in receipt of benefactor rewards just like @freedom. Other important things to note about activity on this accounts
There has been recent votes to @dan eos & bitshares
It also looks like this person speaks or is from Russia and supports a lot of ‘project’ based posts with upvotes.
“Dear utopians and steemians!
I was the guy who shows Crowdin for DTube team, help them start using it and make Russian translation. ;-) Looking forward then @steeminator3000will give me proofreader permissions for this project.” ;-)
By looking at the voting history, it appears this account support projects, giving votes to posts on and from busy and utopian-io and Zappl
In the word cloud below, we can see the key words in the permlink for the first posts voted on by @freedom. I see bitshares in here. This is not the first time bitshares has come up in this investigation. It was mentioned in previous posts that it could be someone from Bitshares, a friend of @dan maybe?
I also see the word ‘bot’ which is rather interesting, but I will get to that later on.
Transfers
While looking at the data, I also looked at the transfers table to see how STEEM and SBD is moving between these account. There were no transfers that raised any suspicion between these accounts. There was however 2 small transfers made by @freedom to @bittrex. Using the memo as a reference, I also searched the entire transfers memos to see if I could find similar memos, or other account transferring out to the same wallet. I didn’t find anything with this either.
Delegation
My next point of call in the data were details of delegations made. As of lately @freedom has been delegating steem power.
A quick look at @freedom wallet and it is clear to see many people want delegation and are prepared to pay for it
Here is the current list of account in receipt of delegation from @freedom as at 12:00 GMT 14/11.
However other people have also received delegation
Upvote bots such as @bellyrub, @minnowbooster and @buildawhale were also in receipt of delegation. This is very interesting as the use of these bots has been questioned by the community a lot in recent times. Bot also appeared in the word cloud above on very early steemit posts. This lead me to looking at other accounts that gave delegation to these upvote bots
Heres what I found
@itchykitten, @storcogato and @sunshine all delegated power to @bellyrub and @minnowbooster.
@minnowbooster delegated power to @buildawhale
@smooth also delegated power to @bellyrub and @buildawhale
@smooth was set up in March 16, account number 234. Could this be another possible suspect?
@sunshine was also a very early adaptor and both @smooth and @sunshine still delegate but don’t share any other delegate in common.
@utopian-io has delegation from both @ned and @freedom
Text and other data sources
While speaking with @teamsteem on discord, he pointed out to me that there was an article in the Guardian last year where ned said he had an angle investor
Scott said the company had a “superangel” investor that helped it get off the ground last February. It will use this momentum to raise funds from institutional investors.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/12/steem-digital-currency-steemit-value-soars
From what I know, @ned and @dan were partners. So this had to be someone that either @ned or @dan brought to the table. @dan has since departed and has been powering down. Although we may note above that bitshares has been mentioned
A Clue ?
At this stage I was tending towards someone that @dan brought to the table. But then I get this from @teamsteem
This is a witness update, from one of the linked accounts. Look at the url. So I went straight back to the database and pulled all the witness updates that contained the url https://steem.io
Check out the list below. All of these account posted a witness update with the url https://steem.io on the same day.in September 17
What I also found from the 13th May 16 was an account called @fox also had a witness update that linked to the same site, without the secure part http://steem.io. @fox seems to be someone that came from bitshares but may be part of the staff
Does that mean that all of these accounts are ‘steemit Inc.’ accounts? Is Steemit Inc. @Freedom or is Steemit Inc. protecting the identity of @freedom?
The projects @freedom is supporting now with delegation are more community and steemit based then personal profit based projects by the delegatee. Is @freedom listening to the community? Or just listening to @ned as @ned stalks us all?
Have I come any closer to identifying @freedom, I don’t think so , but I do think @ned and @dan know the answer.
I would like to thank @teamsteem for suggesting I do this analysis and post, and also giving me some awesome tips to follow. In addition I would like to thank everyone that makes Steemit data easily accessible. In this analysis I used, steemsql, steemd, and steemworld
I am part of a Steemit Business Intelligence community. We all post under the tag #BIsteemit. If you have an analysis you would like carried out on Steemit data, please do contact me or any of the #bisteemit team and we will do our best to help you...
You can find #bisteemit on discord https://discordapp.com/invite/JN7Yv7j'
Great post!
I have a few things to add. First both dan and ned have denied to me (@steemed) directly that they are freedom. Dan has not denied knowing who freedom is. Ned has denied knowing who freedom is, and has said he has asked all developers at steemit whether they are freedom. It is hard to know if either dan or ned is being truthful.
Second, it is clear from when the accounts were first created by mining (which is how we created accounts in the first days of steem) that freedom is a deep insider.
Third, if you match up voting habits of dan and freedom you will see a meganormous boner for @nextgencrypto / @berniesanders (tagged for his entertainment). It is well known that nextgencrypto and berniesanders are the same individual and for some reason dan and freedom HATE him. This is not proof, but is interesting, if you realize that freedom/pumpkin/etc have been somewhat sparing with their downvotes.
Fourth, and probably most importantly you should do some vote timing analysis and see if there are correlations with votes. When was dan voting, when was xeroc voting, and when was pumpkin/freedom/etc voting. I think you will find some interesting, though perhaps not conclusive correlations.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I actually did match up voting habbits of dan, freedom and others while doing this analysis, there was just to much data to publish everything, I I did see who is voting for who and what posts were getting the same attention from all accounts concerned.
But I did not, as you suggested look at voting timing. Now I will just out of pure interest. Thank you very much for your suggestion and detailed response.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
yeah awesome post! I find it so strange that freedom has never cashed out, but it also tells me he truly believes in the platform and that the price of steem will indeed be valued higher.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Alright I will put it to rest. I have been with steem longer than any of you, It is my account, and I am the real Batman too.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I learn a lot about Steem when reading your posts. This one is another great example. I'm glad I reach out to you. I didn't knew pumpkin and paladin had @steem as their recovery account or I had totally forgotten.
This is a very thorough analysis. Thank you for this awesome work!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
LOL Some obvious hate mail when checking Dan's account.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
ouch, thats nasty
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
steemabuse is the right name for that account. someone who abuses with steem.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is sort of embarrassing but... could you explain recovery accounts? It's a term that keeps popping up in your most recent posts, but I'm not sure I have a firm grasp of it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If your account gets stolen and the thief changes your keys, the recovery account (trustee) can help recover your account, as long as you still your old password. Usually the trustee is the one that created your account, but you can change that to anyone else if you want.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
All that digging and the identity of @freedom is still a mystery..Somebody went to great lenghts to stay anonymous.. Maybe we should respect that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
good point
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, please don't get me wrong, I love the #BISteemit posts and follow them, admire what you do and I'm always curious about the hidden secrets in the blockchain.
But I do think your talents are served best for the greater good. Exposing undesired behavior and such.
But digging into an account simply because the high amount of Steem, doesn't necessarily help the community. Being wealthy and identified can make you a target.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It isn't a good point - a blockchain is an open ledger. If this system discourages connecting transactions from fear of someone's reprisal, then its a broken system.
Just another nail in the self-voting bot coffin. Its all back-patting and power networks, apparently.
I appreciate your analysis, don't veer off course just because you're not "supposed" to connect the dots.
How are we going to fix anything if we don't know how its being used?
You are doing a great service to us all by tracing the connections.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Could these accounts be related to Stan Larimer, Dan's father, maybe ?
Just guessing
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by paulag from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews/crimsonclad, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
this was definitely the most interesting post i had the opportunity to read this week thank you very much for sharing this amazing data with us @paulag you are my lovely steemit lady ;) ♥
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
ah thank you @thegoldenphoenix
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great article, with a lot of facts, thanks for sharing!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
makes for very compelling reading!!!!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
but I didnt really find out anything :-(
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
sure you did, you found out lots of stuff.... did you really think you were gonna find "the answer" like a note in a memo "haha I'm really berniesanders"? :p
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
ha haha love it, but yes, I did look for something like that
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Still, great to read investigations and analysis like this!
I do agree with @fitzgibbon somewhat, as long as the account is doing no real harm.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You didn't find what you wanted to know, but the fact that this information is not easily revealed shows that it was not meant to be easily uncovered (and that means something). I think that a good investigation involves asking the right questions and sometimes it means not necessarily being able to find an answer. I think most of my posts end up with a question more than anything else :p
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I only got one word for your work: amazing!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"I'm
;-)Sparticus@Freedom"Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice sleuthing I am in awe master
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
why thank you @stickchumpion. I really enjoyed doing this post and the mountain of work that went with it :-)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This reminded me to get back on the data course , I was away in Portugal being a rock star for two days......(I posted about it ahem cough cough , blatent plug)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
A hard efforted post with utmost facts and figures with analysis. Thanks for sharing @paulag
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Fascinating!!! I write an ode to @freedom in a post but alas, he didn't give me monies
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very interesting post indeed about @freedom.
Thank you :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very interesting ....facts and figures...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I found your great post because i was interested who is behind @freedom because i delegated SP to two projects on Steem:
@freedom delegated 50k SP for each project and is now by far the biggest shareholder in Dlike regarding earned tokens.
Not knowing the identity of this account feels bit odd because this account will also control future markets when tokens will be transferable to an exchange. But that's the nature of a decentralized network without KYC and has some important advantages over centralized platforms.
With Dlike the accounts owns now about 42% of distributed tokens and the share is growing day by day. I have no exact number for Actifit. The situation there is a bit different because there are more big shareholders in it. So i stay curious to learn more about this account.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
not because he/she is rich, but because they control a large part of SP and Witness votes in a community where we all have a vested interest
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
and, it's interesting! she seeks answers, because she can... and that's what the system is built for. transparency within a closed system.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
the blockchain was designed to be transparent, and we are supposed to be able to be aware of what's going on. it was designed with that in mind. not for people to stick thier heads in the sand. we gave permission just using this site for everything to be transparent... that's a big part of what makes the blockchain so awesome!!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Speaking for myself, it is sufficient to know that this person is a behind the scenes major investor early in the project. The concurrent demonstration about key aspects of the distribution of SBD payments for contributed content is very valuable, in my opinion.
One of the reasons that I am anxious for SMT's to succeed is my hope that in that event Steem Inc. will allow Steemit to be taken over by a consortium of investors, who will promptly break it down into a large set of sub-communities of interest, where each sub-community will have its own reward pool and its own leadership that will decide on the criteria and the procedures for allocating rewards.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoted because your assertion that anyone's privacy is "violated" from blockchain analysis is completely incorrect. The block chain is a PUBLIC database. This is known especially to whoever is behind freedom. They went through great lengths to hide relationships between accounts, as part of their opsec. If they fucked up and allowed some information to leak on the public block chain, that is freedom's problem. If you have a problem with it, I suggest you go back to facebook where your information is not only public, but it and any analysis pertaining to it is sold to anyone willing to pay for it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agreed.
#OnlyBigStrongCommunityMackeSteemGreatAgen!!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit