In your example, what happens if there is a fourth upvoter with a max value of $60?
RE: Steem - Reward distribution Proposal
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Steem - Reward distribution Proposal
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
It would work like a 0% upvote.
He'd upvote but it wouldn't change the value.
If he'd upvote with 90$, the one with 90$ would receive a part of his back.
But, as another user mentioned, this system still needs to be adapted, to, for example allow space for curation.
I think a solution would be calculating a "mean-value" of the existing, and allowing to go up to this to avoid 0% votes, to guarantee curation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit