@dan answers that specifically here (hint: it's not the FUD being spread in this thread):
RE: I'm still banned from steemit's github
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm still banned from steemit's github
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
@sneak
I don't recall saying a word about dan. My personal assumption has always been that he is off to make another epic something or another, and that is appropriate for someone like him.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You didn't faddat I did. The link @sneak provided as to @dan's "reasons" for leaving is obviously not the whole story as anyone can see if they click that link. If any FUD is being spread it's not by me.
IMO @faddat raises an important point. His being banned for the reasons @sneak stated might be good reasons for flagging or sanctions in social media, but not for code contributions. Now if @faddat engaged in irrational, emotionally charged comments and submission of issues on github, banning might be the correct solution after being warned a time or 2. I believe it goes deeper than that, but that's only my opinion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agree.
Except.... sneak says I was banned for.... what you said in my post. Whole thing makes no sense and harms steemit.
Maybe I should reconsider my thoughts on growing the steemit userbase via DAWN. (Yes, @sneak, you caused me to reconsider this. And if I do it, let me tell ya, it'll work. )
I think that I will ask the steemit community in my next post.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit