RE: The problem with writing huge articles

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The problem with writing huge articles

in steemit •  7 years ago 

I do the same and consider a similar dilemma. Albeit, I also consider playing a long game with providing content which has a longer half-life, that is, content that is pertinent a year from now, not just today or tomorrow. Of course, there are methods to play with the Venn Diagram a bit more, providing strong half-life data that is also an Hors d'oeuvre and not an Italian-family's Sunday 8-course lunch. I'm going to try and take the route as well with equilibrium by posting more responses to topics (such as this one), which should naturally be shorter than primary content, but have at least one node of value. This too, as a community, is pure experiment (I mean, it is still in beta), so experiment away and iterate based on the feedback loop (or lack of one). Point is keep at it. Cheers.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Good point, experimenting is key, especially on a new platform where people aren't yet 100% sure of what they want. Thanks for the comment! :)