RE: Moving to hive

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Moving to hive

in steemit •  8 years ago 

Downvoted because you completely miss the point. That the meme of the OP is even possible is a reflection of a much greater drain of steem value than the meme itself. Dan and other founders receieved free coins from an unfair and dubious launch and use those coins to dictate the reward pool, further deteriorating the legitimacy of this coin. A meme is a valid way to criticize scammy behavior and does add value to the platform.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

There is nothing unfair or dubious about the launch, I was participating in it myself and I can testify that everything Dan said about the launch is true. E.g. it was relaunched next day not because Steemit's miner stopped working but because there was real overflow bug.

Keep making that claim and I will debunk it in 100 words and 5 lines of code and you will look like a fool in the process.

Censoring him is more effective, right?
I would prefer you bring your 100 words and 5 lines...

Wait! You can censor me too ;)

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

It's not censorship, it's still on the blockchain! /s

Ok, go ahead and debunk, but please don't cite that guy who was spreading the FUD to mine more for himself. BTW could anyone remind me who it was?

@smooth, it looks like your friend is using flags when he doesn't agree with somebody's opinion, do you support him here too?

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

Your meme is irrelevant. If you had bothered to understand the history of steem, you'd see that dan and colleagues have conspired endlessly to diminish the value of my holdings and the holdings of other whale outsiders like berniesanders. Their efforts have included dubious relaunches, to trying to fork the coin to reduce our curation rewards, to proposing "negation" of "evil whale" voting power. Of course humans will not act like a grateful dog under these circumstances.

Even the entire "reputation" system is a mechanism to reduce the value of our steem. The founders are spiteful towards outsiders and should be subject to criticism.

Don't you realize that all the changes devs propose affect all stakeholders equally?
Instead of putting yourself into outsiders group and spread the FUD around it would be more productive to collaborate and work together to bring more value to the platform.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

Nothing affects all stakeholders equally. Each stakeholder has an individual situation which in part determines determines the effects (positive and negative) of changes on that particular stakeholder. This includes not only things like the size of the holding and how it is or isn't broken up into different accounts but also many factors external to the blockchain.

Sounds like an interesting topic for a post if you ever decide to make one.

  ·  8 years ago Reveal Comment

I am very sad about your downvotes @berniesanders...
I thought my comments would have a different outcome to be honest. My mistake.

@steemed not only legitimacy but also the intended legality. It was essential to the entire strategy outlined in that blog posts that mining be open to outsiders.

Your post is contradictory. Early non-insider miners do give the platform value because we give it legitimacy. Try to actually read the post you linked and understand it from the point of legitimacy. What dan and colleagues do is persistently undermine the legitimacy of steem.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

artificial-whales that contributed nothing

To make that clear I am referring to the mining period and not after...

I mean all accounts that had nothing to do with the project except of mining steem... and the rewards (steem) they got because of just mining early on...
I am not referring to contributions after early mining like @smooth and @berniesanders did (curie,busy, etc.)
... and don't take me wrong but many have contributed much more than most of existing whales compared with their free-wealth...
I mean it means more when someone that has a total of $100 wealth contributes for example half of them aka $50 compared with a whale sitting on $1M (that was not hard earning money) and contributes a total of $100K for example.....

Mark 12:44
For all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living.

You threatened to flag me once for this little gem:

Yeah, WTF right?

THERE you are, you bastard!

lol

Pure hypocrisy!

Cg

I'd downvote your post but I think you are just being snarky. I made no such threat to downvote a meme. If I had there would be evidence of it in the blockchain, and you provide no such evidence.