Hello Steemians!
We are happy to say that the witnesses have reached consensus on Hardfork 19, codenamed “Equality.” This update to the Steem Blockchain Protocol changes how rewards are distributed to the content creators using any Steem application like Steemit.com or Busy.org.
Linear Rewards!
The code was released last week and witnesses have been upgrading to it since that time. As of right now the top 20 witnesses are all running 0.19 but the changes described below will not go into effect until tomorrow morning (Tuesday, June 20th, 2017 at 15:00:00 UTC). Once those changes in logic take effect, the voting power of the users of any Steem-based application will be directly proportional to the amount of Steem Power they possess. Some have referred to this as “1 Steem Power, 1 Vote.” From that moment on accounts with a large amount of Steem Power will no longer have exponentially more voting power (i.e. influence) than accounts with less Steem power. This will reduce the degree of inequality within the ecosystem while preserving the incentive to accumulate STEEM and disincentivizing sybil-attacks.
What Are Hardforks?
For those new to Steem, “hardforks” are what people call updates to a blockchain protocol. The Steem Blockchain has an innovative Witness-based system that allows improvements to be made to the protocol more rapidly than other blockchain protocols. All that is necessary for a Steem hardfork is for the top 20 witnesses, who are chosen by the users, to adopt the changes based on their assessment that the code is bug-free and does not pose a threat to the security of the blockchain.
When it comes to most blockchains, a change like the one that will occur would either never happen, or would lead to an entirely new blockchain that would coexist alongside the unchanged original. Thanks to Steem’s unique design, when it became clear that there was a widespread consensus among Steem users that the reward system needed to be changed, we were able to come together and implement this change which will make the Steem Ecosystem more fair, and the Steem Blockchain more valuable.
Improving the Process
It was only 2 months ago that we first started experimenting with a proposal process which involved presenting the changes we were considering to the community for feedback before attempting to update the blockchain. We had lots of great discussions with the community which helped guide improvements to our proposal and that enabled us to arrive at a consensus regarding the necessary changes.
Thank you!
We want to give a special “Thank You” to everyone who contributed to this discussion and helped make the Steem Blockchain even better. That includes all the Witnesses, not just the top 20, who work tirelessly to maintain the stability, security, and sanctity of the Steem Blockchain. Their communication, cooperation, and diligence have enabled us to execute this change in the timeframe we did while meeting our high quality assurance standards.
Additional Information
The information below was included in our previous post Pre-Release HF19: Linear Rewards! and is included below for the benefit of those who would like to familiarize themselves with the other changes that will be occurring.
Curation Rewards and Vote Impact
There are two other changes, aside from linear rewards, within the update that affect non-technical community members: 1. Changing to a square root curation rewards curve and 2. Increasing vote impact.
Curation Rewards
The change to the curation rewards curve will not have a noticeable impact on curation rewards and is necessary simply to prevent the linear reward curve changes from having a material impact on curation rewards.
Vote Impact
The changes to the impact of a 100% vote are more material. A 100% vote will be 4 times more powerful once HF19 is completed. As it stands now a single 100% vote uses only 0.5% of your remaining voting power (voting power regenerates fully over a 5 day period). That means real users would need to vote 40 times a day at full power to use most of their voting power. This leaves users who are less active unable to fully leverage their voting power. After this change, a single 100% vote will use 2% of your remaining voting power, meaning that 10 full-power votes a day will now be enough to leverage the majority of your daily voting power.
Users can continue to simply upvote-at-will because a vote only consumes a percentage of the remaining voting power, not the total. Imagine “voting power” as a swimming pool that is constantly being refilled by the rain. Every time you upvote you reduce the amount of water (in this case “voting power”) from the pool by a percentage (i.e. it’s not like you are constantly removing 500 gallons from the lake). The next time you vote you are removing another percentage from an already diminished supply.
That means there are still no limits on how much you can vote. The more you vote the more you incrementally decrease the amount of voting power you have (the water in the pool). To get a better sense of how powerful your votes are and the rate at which that power diminishes simply observe how much your full power upvotes increase the rewards of content creators and you should get an intuitive sense of how the algorithm works.
You can read the release notes on github here: https://github.com/steemit/steem/releases/tag/v0.19.0rc1
We have more exciting announcements coming this week, so stay tuned and Steem On!
- Team Steemit
Tip: If you are used to vote at 100%, make sure you lower your voting slider to 25% as of tomorrow. At least if you vote more than 10 times a day.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
:O so powerful upvote :O
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Looking for a definitive clarification on what happens to posts created between 13th June 1500 UTC and 20th June 1500 UTC, that'll start paying out right after HF19. Will the pending payouts hold as voted before HF19? So, if I made a post today and one whale voted it up to $20, will the payout still be $20 on the 26th? Or will it be retroactively "linearized"? I'm inclined to believe the linear rewards will only start from votes given out after HF19, and thus the existing payouts will be honoured, but a clarification would be appreciated. Suggest you add that to the post.
This is definitely a good step forward from the absence of communication surrounding HF18. Eagerly awaiting those exciting announcements!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Haha, I have experienced in HF 17. My post for $ 18 (that's a big amount for me) to 0 when HF 17.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, that was a mess. While it was announced on Github, it was never communicated properly to the community. That's why a lot of people were upset - had they known it was to be expected, they would be prepared for it.
Similarly, it's important to know what kind of changes we should expect to pending payouts this time.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think the best demonstration of the rewards change would be to have 20 or so whales vote on my comment with their full power and then wait to see if the payout remains the same or decreases after the fork.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I just gave you a puny minnow upvote, because that was very funny!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
A brilliant idea!
Cg
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice try :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, do the experiment. Whales vote on my last post so I can record the results.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
In a recent post by @timcliff, I believe he said that if a post hasn't paid out by the time the hard fork is implemented, it will be retroactively linearized.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Which seems to be in direct contradiction with this post.
Need a clarification from the developers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Will vote impact also be implemented retroactively? Will everyone's individual voting power initially take a massive hit? If all my 100% votes from the last week turn into 400% votes I'm going to be totally drained lol.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Haha, good question. I haven't heard that to be the case.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
😲😂 it better not be
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
9 hours later, nobody knows. That's how we roll @steemit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the article, great way of explaining it all.
I love this new system, check it out, can pay myself $10.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And again.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations for that! I hope I can achieve this level too someday!
I am a relatively new user. I registered approximately 1 month ago.
Have a nice day!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This looks like it's going to be yuge. But people will be more careful on voting. It might actually do the opposite of "equality", people will vote up hot and trending authors because of possible higher curation rewards while new section will be a scroll practice.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Upvoting an already trending post is the worst strategy when it comes to curation rewards. You'll only add curation rewards to the early voters while making a negligible amount yourself. The rewards algorithm heavily favours early voters.
Instead upvote great undiscovered posts, then spread the word around. That's the optimal way to maximise curation rewards. Or maybe strike a balance by voting early on a semi-established but not trending author, they will get some votes after you.
Of course, you're right to be concerned that few are aware of how the rewards system works and may end up piling the votes on trending posts in ignorance. Worse still, they might end up being the kind of casual voters who make less than 10 votes per day, and now suddenly have much greater influence due to the vote impact change.
I hope as a community we can curate responsibly. It'll need the right education and support.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very useful info, thanks!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I see that as a possibility that most people will just want to power up trending posts 🤔😩😂
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Interesting, thanks for the info! Still trying to figure things out on Steemit and posts / replies such as this one really help to understand! Cheers
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for advice, very helpful
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agreed, not sure why the curation rewards had to be amplified. I haven't seen curation incentivise voting that is beneficial to the platform as a whole. (Apart from upvoting #introduceyourself posts)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Your comments make sense !!!
=]
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
a lot has changed since the beginning, maybe an update with the whitepaper is needed to help new users(even old ones).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, this makes sense to me..
I would like to see very much transparency and ease of use on knowing where this is all going?
thankyou..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great job by the team, and the witnesses! Appreciate your efforts.
What possibilities this will bring forth, we will get to see. But for the great number of new users that have joined recently, this will be their first hard-fork experience and hoping it will benefit all and move forward the cause of making steemit beautiful and taking it to the masses.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for including these points. Voting power is widely misunderstood, and it's important for users to know that they can still vote as much as they want.
Can someone explain how a linear reward curve disincentivizes sybil attacks? I thought the purpose of the ^2 reward curve was to disincentize sybil, and that sybil attacks were precicely the perceived problem with a linear or near-linear curve.
Don't get me wrong, I strongly favor this change, but I'm not sure I understand how it would disincentivize sybil attacks.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good question @shenanigator. There were multiple reasons for the n^2 curve only one of which was discouraging sybil attacks. The statement to which you are referring is only meant to highlight the point that despite these changes it will remain advantageous to accumulate Steem and disadvantageous to launch sybil attacks.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Currently, it's too easy for whales to dominate and abuse the system. The central fallacy of the original whitepaper / n^2 was that whales would act in the best interests of the community, but evidently people will only ever act in their own self interest. As they have the right to, of course. By distributing influence more evenly, the impact of whale abuse is significantly diminished.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
For the most part, I would say that it "does not incentivize" sybil attacks. I think "disincentivizes" overstates it.
Although, one way that it actually may slightly disincentivize sybil attacks is that other users can vote between two sybil accounts, say sybil-1 and sybil-2, which would reduce the curation rewards of (sybil-1 + sybil-2) as compared to a single account voting the full weight all at once.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yup, I don't understand how it makes it fairer; I'm just taking their word for it; however it would be nice having it explained.
Cg
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank u, Have a nice day
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Should we expect any drastic shift in current pending payouts due to the changes in voting influence of votes that were already made ?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
as I heard from one of the developers, the high reward posts like 4k figures will get kicked in the butt, while the post in the range of 1-200 USD will get a boost.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good question. I was wondering the same thing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I hope HF 19 gives a fair reward system. I have never achieved a reward of 100, maybe my posts are not qualified. But, what about other posts that are not qualified can get a lot of rewards?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
good morning, don't be confused by 100 ... 100% upvote is not the same as an upvote that gives $100 (i have no idea how to do the math ... but i'm thinking you might need a whale to come by and upvote to get $100) ... anyway you can see who has been able to vote for you at what % at https://www.steemnow.com/ Right this second, 100% of my vote would be about 0.005 ... hope that helps :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Cool app. Thank you for sharing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for sharing this valuable information.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Update the link to the Pre-Release HF19: Linear Rewards post (in the article) - it's calling a bad url --- https://steemit.com/steemit/@steemitblog/%E2%80%9Dhttps://steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/2hfxx1-pre-release-hf19-linear-rewards%E2%80%9D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Fixed. Thank you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Polish version of this great news!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nice update. Looking forward to trying out the new changes. Exciting times!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I can't believe this incredible world I'm finding myself walking into.
Time to explore...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Enjoy your life
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for clarifying that it is a 2% on the Remaining rather than on the Total.
I was confused about it and it was something I feared from the new HF I though it meant a Max of 10 votes a day. What a relief! Haha.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like your picture very much, I follow you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
LOL
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
this is my first week, and HF here, so after one week there is a chance that I may get zero rewards :) I'm excited though to see what it is going to be like
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This was very helpful. Can't wait for the change to happen. Now my vote will count :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like the idea.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
this post was very helpful we appreciate if you provide more post like this
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's a good news. I support HF19.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This will be an interesting experiment, whale censorship we've already seen has turned into quite a problem where you have idiots with big accounts trying to flag content they don't like. If this helps reduce censorship as much as possible I'm all for it, I just hope this doesn't backfire with the payout system though, but we'll just have to see how it goes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As a new-ish member I'm pretty happy to see how flexible you guys are and strive to keep everyone happy and motivated. Looking forward to seeing what .19 will bring!
I'm keeping my introductory post until after the fork so that everyone can smash that upvote and send me to Monte Carlo
I salute you!
Motan
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hardfork, witnesses, all this was foreign to me but since reading this post, I now understand what's happening with HF-19. I'm behind it 100% and can't wait to see equality in action. This should help new Steemians and those still growing to influence the network and make impactful contributions.
:)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for this post!
This has cleared up a lot of problems that have been pondering on my mind
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
does this change affect the power of few downvotes by big fish to completely someone's work and the rewards of other less powerful upvotes?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Geeat post thank you. Resteemed! You should have taken the reward you earned it! Good thing for the "common" STEEMIAN like me who has only ~300 SP
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@steemitblog - I came back tonight to reread through the changes that came with HF19 and based on the new voting power/impact information you have supplied here, the FAQs for Voting and Curating would need to be updated.
How many times can I vote without depleting my voting power, etc. If I'm not mistaken, those number are much different now.
Not sure who's in charge of that, but I figured this might be a good starting point. :-)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for the update! I believe even the talks about adjusting the voting months ago was a big factor in saving this platform! It will be interesting how this changes everything! I'm READY!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great stuff Thanks for sharing and keeping us informed .
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Equality..sounds crazy enough to work. I like it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for this clear explanation and links.
ch @globocop
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for giving everyone so much information!
Been on steem for a little over a month and there is so much I have learned and still more I need to learn, thanks for the people that put all this together and working to make it better.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Big times ahead!! The last fork improved things and I expect no less this time!! :0)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
are all upvotes more powerful or just 100% upvotes ?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not necessarily all. It's difficult to predict which users will see a decrease in voting influence due to the linear curve, but all minnows should see an increase. And yes any % upvote will be more powerful for minnows.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
all minnows without the voting slider will be limited to 10 votes a day. after that their voting power will go down faster than it will re-charge
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Then they should have the voting slider. Should be easy to implement that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
the voting power appears at 500sp. I think thats a great incentive to reach that milestonne.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Tell us something more please!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great post! Short but packed with important info! Steem On!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't know how much a minnow vote will be in the future. now it is 0-1 cent, but if this goes up to 10-50 cents per vote, it will be really motivating for everybody to vote.
through the whale-non-upvote expermiment, I could vote up people with one click with 1.6 USD. that was really cool, so I did a lot curating to vote for a lot people in the last weeks.
Maybe this change will be a game changer for steemit! I hope it will be
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you!!!
I have a question though.
What will happen with all those posts that are waiting to the seventh day to have the earnings distributed? Will the $ already raised be affected? Or are these changes only affecting brand new posts?
Thanks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Side point: questionable use of Portuguese military image. Why use this? @steemitblog an the official Steemit Inc. account so you are stating at least ambivalence towards state military (and the Portuguese in particular) and at most a support of them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm really glad to see how easily we reached consensus on HF19. Let's keep moving forward and improving.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Superb
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for that little tid bit at the end about how the voting power works. I actually hadn't seen that before and it was nice to see it explained like that. :)
Regarding the rest of it, it will be interesting to see how it all plays out. Hopefully it will go a long ways towards keeping a lot of the new users we are currently seeing sign up.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for the explanation. I needed clarification on what happened today... new to steemit. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I see now, and I finally understand what a Hard Fork is. I'm glad this changes took place.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@steemitblog is it okay to get excited after seeing pending payouts or is it going to be reverted back? It would be heartbreaking to seen these tiny numbers go back to negligible.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It is good plan but let us see its impact over few months and if need be adjust it further.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This sounds absolutely incredible. Super excited about it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I support these changes.
I like the idea that my one cent investment is worth as much as one cent from a million dollar investment.
Also, the ability of using more voting power per vote is necessary because of the "I would UV you twice if I could" situations. One could still UV 'infinite' times.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
thank you. I am glad i finally saw this change occur. It had the exact effect that I had visualized.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@ned @steemitblog Is it ok with Steemit to use voting bots? I see people using it all the time. I tried once or twice, just no sure is it ok to use it? Thanks for replying.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It is a pity that the threshold of the most effective vote is limited by the number 40. After all, if there are millions of users in Steemet as well, then vote for interesting content?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
With more power comes more responsibility. If we vote for posts that we actually find value in, it could improve consensus on what is rewarded well. If we keep trying to game curation, we could make the concentration of votes and rewards worse
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As a new arrival (a little over 1 month) the main things that confused me was the energy put into; buying upvotes, gimmicks, schemes and the huge $$$amounts going to mundane posts.
I'm still not sure how the "whales" got to be whales. I also notice alot of ridiculous "whale-courting" comments, in the hopes that a poster might be smiled upon and noticed, which deters me from even reading the comments.
I hope the changes can be implemented smoothly, didn't understand the old system, don't get the new one, but good luck!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I loled when I read "codenamed equality", it's more or less an admission that the exponential reward curve was a bust me thinks.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey @ned - I gave you a mention in The Daily Dose today:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@mindhunter/the-steemit-daily-dose-hard-fork-19-day-a-role-modelmentor-for-ned-and-skycoin--1497949841-509389
Liking your profile tagline BTW :) Could I reword it to 'A dream trapped within a vision.'?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh, cool. Thanks for the flag, @ned!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@ned never gives me any flags. :(
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, that sucks. Have you tried leaving a comment that points out something obvious and shouldn't trigger anyone? That might do the trick! :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nothing obvious but I guess I am so underneath the radar of the whales I wouldn't get a flag if I asked for one.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you @ats-david for making @ned shows up on your comment. It's been so long since last vote. 😁☺
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You're welcome!
Maybe he'll even stick around and contribute to the conversation...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"Create all that you are capable of doing. Your disabilities can be turned into capabilities. You really can overcome and prosper.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit