You were the one who brought the witnesses into this. I wasn't even thinking about them, why on earth would someone want to sue the witnesses?....it's the owners that would get sued. I don't know what country you come from but here in the US people get protected from abuse, and your blockchain can abuse all they want but you know what?...those who develop and allow the abuse can be sued for loses of those abuses if regulatory value is instilled. Once again, Steemit is a privately held company, as a privately held company the owners can be held liable for abuse.
RE: Open Letter to @ned and all Steemians - Stop the wars and the abuse of steem power, we are only damaging Steemit!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Open Letter to @ned and all Steemians - Stop the wars and the abuse of steem power, we are only damaging Steemit!
Because there are no Owners genius.
You cannot sue for loses because nobody guaranteed you anything, genius. You cannot sue for abuse because someone voicing their opinion with a flag is completely in line with the rules.
Steemit doesn't own Steem, genius, Once again read the whitepaper, inform yourself and bite your tongue before spreading FUD.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What would be the losses exactly genius? And who would be sued? the user? the Owners, for not stopping abuse as if they made such promises (no, the developer, READ NOT OWNERS, expressed clearly that the goal is never preventing abuse).
You keep saying Steemit is centralized, Steemit is Privately Owned but you fail to see that the CEO of steemit has said this:
When issues with the License for steem were brought up, exemplifying that same ethos that had been at the foundation of steem a two years ago: Steem will go on despite Steemit. Steemit is not Steem.
#abuseoflogic
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
STEEM is not decentralized. From the beginning it was and still remains highly centralized. The launch of the STEEM network was heavily rigged to ensure that the developer and his ‘friends’ had control over majority of supply. Furthermore, this has major implications for the Steemit platform.
The top 247 accounts on Steemit (most of which are probably owned by the developer and his ‘friends’ through duplicate accounts) own ~87.50% of total stake, without including the main steemit account which is also controlled by the dev. Although any user can vote for content, the influence of your vote corresponds to the amount of STEEM you convert on your account. This means the typical user’s vote is almost meaningless unless they manage to acquire a high stake in total supply.
https://decentralize.today/the-ugly-truth-behind-steemit-1a525f5e156
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It has been decentralized the moment that it got forked into Golos, Wake UP. Who cares how much of the stake is owned when the freaking CODE is free to copy and paste wherever you want for whatever you want? What's the problem with them holding a huge stake in a decentralized platform? It still doesn't make the fact that it's decentralized any different or less, it's not "a little decentralized" ok. When you speak of centralized power you are referring to how the voting power is distributed into a group, and it is not so as the group isn't officially or unofficial a Group even, only a distinction you draw based on opinions and not fact, so it's completely a value judgement from your personal viewpoint and NOTHING more.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit