With all my respect, I believe that this is not the way to offer millions in delegated resources to projects whether they are in the process of being cured or in development, in this way all the abusers of the blockchain will come to the call for money, there are other ways, to study private proposals, to study the viability, seriousness with which these resources are treated and the destination of these future rewards that can be obtained and to study the whole set of ideas that the project will bring together for the future and certainly not for a month, there is no serious project that has a project to a month, ask every project manager that has a tour or those users of confidence that do not try to win a war but to maintain the blockchain where it was before any confrontation, do not organize a snack of black people and entrust that work to other levels where to study serious proposals. Finally, if you rectify this proposal, you may be pleasantly surprised. Greetings and good luck.
RE: 100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 3 – The Community Curators Project
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
100 DAYS OF STEEM : Day 3 – The Community Curators Project
This is a serious project and I would like them to return to Steemit I saw them selflessly helping the Spanish speaking community. It is an account that with little attempt to do much of all my support for this community. @templo
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks a lot, but this is not the best way to decide to allocate such a valuable resource nor should this be the proposal, perhaps witnesses should reconsider the content and form.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit