While cryptocurrencies aren't companies, the Elizabeth Holmes case serves as a reminder you should ignore the charisma of founders.
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Holmes' ultimate downfall, however, was her hubris. She never was big enough to admit that her testing kit didn't work YET. I say YET because, for all we know, Theranos could have figured out in 5-10 years how to properly analyze those micro-samples, and their product would have taken over the market. But she wanted the fame right away and thought she was too slick to get caught over-selling. So the company did stupid things to cover for her lies
-Using full-sized Siemens equipment to carry out the example blood tests (because theirs were so inaccurate)
-Driving a leading researcher to suicide after he tried to whistle-blow
-Attempting to payoff lawsuits with company stock
-etc
All the time, she lied openly on TV about the capabilities of her product and continued to accept money for a flawed product.
Remind you of anyone in Crypto? Honestly, a few major names would fit the bill, and barring any surge of luck in the devs of their respective projects, I see those coins in question going the same way as Theranos (albeit with fewer legal sanctions)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit