There is an issue here in that there is a Terms of Service for steem that actually could be said to prohibit the actions of Steemcleaners. Despite their claims to be supported by the community, there are many who disagree with their decisions and for justifiable reasons.
RE: Can You Explain Why This Post Exposing an Alleged High Profile Scammer on Steemit is Censored, Despite a Ratio of 44 Upvotes to 1 Downvote!?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Can You Explain Why This Post Exposing an Alleged High Profile Scammer on Steemit is Censored, Despite a Ratio of 44 Upvotes to 1 Downvote!?
There are no terms for steem, none that were explicitly agreed to anyway.
Yes people will disagree but it's only an issue if it's consequential like a lot of people, or a large majority, but what are some reasons that you consider justifiable for people to disagree with spam, tag spam and otherwise curation for those ends?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh, I meant to say that there are terms of service for Steemit, not Steem. Since Steem and Steemit are both created by the same group, I combine them in my mind.
The terms of service for Steemit specifically includes a term in section 17 that is relevant.
Cases of blatant plagiarism with no added value from the author and deliberate malicious misuse of the software that amounts to criminal intent are valid reasons to downvote, i think. Deliberate propaganda and misinformation is also a valid reason. Some might say that some of these are subjective, but ultimately I feel that the absolute truth can be known in all cases - though it might require a lot of research to find it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Nope, it's irrelevant what someone writes as Terms of Service if nobody agreed to anything.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Not at all, Steemit Inc. Is subject to local laws and as such could be compelled to comply with them or face termination. As such they could choose to remove accounts from Steemit and, although I am not familiar enough with the licensing for Steem, could potentially also be forced to effectively enforce laws on Steem too. It's a new technology, so the case law is not clear - i think - however, a blockchain is not an ungovernable system.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Unfortunately that doesn't mean anything, the point remains, that if I didn't agree to any terms they aren't enforceable, it doesn't matter what Steemit Inc the company is subject to, the data on the chain, the tokens, the account is mine, it's not theirs, and they have no right over the blockchain or the data in the blockchain.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
They have right to determine who does and does not use their services.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No they don't, they don't have any right to do that. It's my content, it's my tokens, and it's my account.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am not aware of a single example of that logic being held up and supported in court, but I am not the world's leading 'legal' expert.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit