@berniesanders, you are participating in @curie project too so I'm pretty sure you are aware that all the voting power of devs account you mentioned is delegated to the team of curators so do the curation rewards as well.
Look at my account's transfers - 100% of the curation rewards goes to @curie's curators.
So what you are saying in the post's title is a lie and you know it.
RE: Moving to hive
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Moving to hive
@val-a this is not true. According to these links:
Your accounts have been getting around 1000 STEEM of curation reward every day, but only ~1000 STEEM transferred to @curie every one week or two. Perhaps there are other transfers that I'm not aware of?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@abit, there is a virtual pool vesting for 2 years, so my payments follow the vesting schedule. I'm considering to change it to 3 months vesting to catch up with Steem's economy changes, but my agreement with @curie states clearly that they eventually will have 100% of the rewards.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Got it. With the old 104-week rule, it's just not divesting quick enough when the pool size was set too small.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
From the conversations I have with people here on a daily basis, I would say it's a safe bet that without curie, steemit would have a fraction of its user retention. It has gotten to the point where most people are afraid to speak up for the guilds, but I've found a large majority are extremely grateful for what they do. Now that I no longer qualify for curie I was fortunate to be picked up by Ned's guild... because without the guilds, what could I hope to earn? What could most people hope for here? That someone with a lot of sp happens to be on the home page when their post appears there? Aside from the handful of people who happen to be friends with larger investors, I'd say the chances of a post being hit would be like winning the lottery. I appreciate what you do, and even though many are silent right now, I know I'm not in the minority.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That's you, what about the rest of your coworkers??
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't know exact numbers, but what I know for sure - all the devs value long term ecosystem growth over the short term profit, reaping curation rewards pool is definitely not the strategy anybody who invested any significant amount of their time or money would chose.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actions speak louder than words.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Don't be too harsh, @berniesanders.
It's hard to know the right choices to make in life.
An obvious choice for you, might look extremely troubling to a group of developers who all need to not only agree, but actually implement the changes in a way that works.
Things are just difficult in real life sometimes, so we need to be understanding, instead of harsh.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit