RE: Hey Steemit Whales, How'd You Like To Fix All Of Steemit's Problems And Make Bank By Doing Absolutely Nothing?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Hey Steemit Whales, How'd You Like To Fix All Of Steemit's Problems And Make Bank By Doing Absolutely Nothing?

in steemit •  7 years ago 

@yallapai

OR

We set Reward limits and Posts limit. I guess if we keep max 250$ per post and max 2 posts a day, that comes to 500$ per day means 15000$ per month, thats if they make the full amount. Which is morethan enough for any one to live life in any part of the world. and obviously you can invest in steem/SBD or other cryptos. This will also limit the greed...

Also a minimum reward like 50 cents to 1$ (more or less i leave to experts) for every post with a minimum content (bots can handle this im sure) will give a boost to minnows, and will also lead to genuine wealth distribution.

Flagging should be removed, and i have seen and experienced personal grudges being removed by the whales who rarely posts due their high deligated power, and just flags the posts of members they dont like for whatever reason.

wdt.gif

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

How about impose arbitrary limits on earnings that can be easily circumvented by anyone with half a brain

You're thinking from the wrong direction. Don't look to restrict the system.

Try and figure out a way to use the system that is currently in place to your personal benefit, while also benefiting many other people at the same time. Financial benefit, not stupid good feelings or "good of the community" fake benefits.

You got a 23.36% upvote from @emperorofnaps courtesy of @yallapapi!

Want to promote your posts too? Send 0.05+ SBD or STEEM to @emperorofnaps to receive a share of a full upvote every 2.4 hours...Then go relax and take a nap!

  1. Limiting rewards per account won't help as one can crate the whole lot of accounts and distribute SP among them.
  2. You'll get what you pay for. If you pay half a dollar for low-effort monnow post you will get tons and tons of low posts.
  3. I believe flagging is an essential part of the platform.

Limiting vest per post would lower rewards per post and would make creating multiple account moot.

Answers:

  1. True, cant we create bots that can track them? like how some tracked some accounts recently?
  2. They will still not reach the trending page as no one would vote for it. However 50cents was just an eg. we can set a limit to 1cent, 10cent etc.
  3. Some whales are taking advantage of it flagging people they hate, removing personal grudges. Or maybe we can set limits of flagging too, so nobody can flag to 0, as you know some have a powerful SP
  1. Okay, you track them. Then what? We could easily track haejin posting random crap and vote it to the skies - how it helps us?
  2. You propose inflation and reward pool redistribution to minnows for ANY post that gets into blockchain. Actually need to think about it. It could be a nice idea.
  3. We could introduce flags that deplete upvote by a proportion like voting power. Voting power never reach zero, so would do sbd worth of ups.

Sounds good to me... But problem is these need to get discussed in steemfests and meetups, then partying or ass kissing.. Steemfests seems like "Bilderberg" to me..

That's probably true.

Bildelberg. LoL

Flagging needs to be encouraged not removed. There has to be a way of dusting the spammers

What about whales removing personal grudges on good content if someone tells them that they have posted shit, i have seen that happening. They go to their page, and start flagging their posts, which are not bad content at all.

Present rules give them such power so they use it.

That needs to be changed..

If there was a limit on how much vest a whale can use to uvpote/downvote then the karma could get rebalanced by upvoters.
https://steemit.com/steem/@snowflake/history-is-a-great-teacher

What about limiting how many times per week/month 1 users votes count towards another?

For example, if I upvote your comment or post today then upvote your comment or post tomorrow, the vote tomorrow doesn't count. This could help prevent bots from voting for the same user over and over again.

Of course it does have the problem of "just make more accounts." Perhaps it could be IP based as well? It wouldn't completely solve the problem but it could help mitigate it.

IP based voting maybe could work on a Steemit.com or a busy.org level. But not on the blockchain.

Anyone could fork the steemit sourcecode from github, and run his or hers own server.

That wouldn't be overly difficult for the people who are currently gaming the system.

That makes sense. Thank you for the expansion.

Loading...