RE: The Announcement of Hardfork 23.0

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The Announcement of Hardfork 23.0

in steemit •  5 years ago 

That is what I would have hoped for as well. Both chains going their own way and not making it worse then it already was.

And then I read about the blacklist and the bug in the script creating the blacklist.

I don't know if you know but the idiots on Hive used a script to create the blacklist and there had been a bug adding innocent accounts.

What a mess.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

No, the bug was NOT a bug. It was intentional and used as a means of punishment aimed at those who didn't pile onto Justin for fabricated causes.

The rebrand of blacklist to error was in response to blowback.

Also if it was an error as they are conveniently claiming after the fact, why the gloating on steemit borking a fork, yet claiming an error while doing a fork of their own.

The irony is pretty thicc in this comment section since those with the most to say and criticism have the most experience and were the stewards of the chain.

Also, why havent those affected by the bug been airdropped their tokens if it was supposed to be corrected?

One does not exclude the other. You can try to dosh out some unjust punishment and have a bug in your script.

And those affected by the bug like @scottcbusiness where silently reimbursed. That you don't know that shows you are not full informed.

No, to this day, not everyone has been reimbursed. Do you need a link? Fid they finish doing it today? If not, quit lying to yourself. Im as informed as they come.

No, to this day, not everyone has been reimbursed

Dit I say everyone? No, I didn't. I'm well aware that only a few selected where reimbursed.

Don't argue what I didn't say. That's called straw man fallacy.

You said becuase 1 person was reimbursed, I didn't know what I was talking about. You confused yourself. I noted that a few comments earlier.

I was correct. I'm just here to make sure you dont confuse anyone else. Carry on.

I didn't say one person either. I gave one example of a group.

You are the one confused by what is generally called a false dichotomy.

There are more options than none, one and everyone.

And looking back at our discussion I can see that the inability to see alternatives and gradations is indeed your main problem in understanding the situation.

Everything in your argumentation is either or and never any middle ground.

Yawns get over yourself. Go troll in Hive man, nobody here cares for your lies.

I laughed, you lost. Have a nice life.

Declaring yourself the winner? And declaring that all 1.3 million users think the same as you do?

You are so full of yourself and you have just outed yourself as an idiot.

PS: If you tell me to do something it is quite likely I do the opposite. That would be the opposite of of your intention. Not the opposite of your words.

arguingwithidiotsislikeplayingchesswithapigeon.jpg